Has the search for the perfect running shirt stopped you in your tracks? Here at OutdoorGearLab, we extensively researched over 50 of the top women's running shirts on the market today and picked the top 7 for months of hands-on testing. Our expert team spent months running, hiking, traveling, and exploring in each model to learn all the details of their construction. We judged their comfort and fit by wearing them everywhere we went and tested their breathability by constantly working up a sweat. Through both adventuring and controlled research, we looked into the versatility, design features, and drying speed as well. Keep reading for the scoop on all our award winners and more information on how to pick the shirt that's best for your adventures. Get running!
The Best Running Shirts for Women
|Price||$34.99 at MooseJaw|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$51.99 at MooseJaw|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$27.95 at Amazon||$29.98 at Amazon||$23.93 at REI|
Compare at 2 sellers
|Pros||Lightweight, super breathable, fast drying||Comfortable, breathable, versatile||Inexpensive, comfortable, versatile||Comfortable, soft||Soft, quick to dry, inexpensive|
|Cons||Expensive, not as versatile||Expensive, slower to dry||Slower to dry, no cool features||Less breathable, slow to dry||Less breathable, tight fit, no features|
|Bottom Line||The Windchaser is an ultralight, super breathable shirt that is both comfortable and made for performance.||The PhD Ultra Light is a lightweight, comfy shirt great for any adventure.||The Reaxion Amp is a simple, inexpensive shirt with top-notch performance.||The Dri-FIT Tailwind by Nike is a luxuriously soft shirt not perfectly fit for running.||The Distance top from Brooks is a simple, comfortable shirt without the features of many of its competitors.|
|Rating Categories||Windchaser||PhD Ultra Light||Reaxion Amp V-Neck||Dri-FIT Tailwind||Distance|
|Drying Time (20%)|
|Features & Versatility (20%)|
|Specs||Windchaser||PhD Ultra Light||Reaxion Amp V-Neck||Dri-FIT Tailwind||Distance|
|Material||100% polyester||56% merino wool, 44% polyester||100% polyester||85% polyester, 15% cotton||85% polyester, 15% cotton|
|Weight||2.2 oz||3.7 oz||2.8 oz||3.7 oz||3.1 oz|
Just in time for prime trail running season, we're pleased to bring you seven of our favorite women's running shirts. Our review team spent all spring testing these very different products side-by-side, and we're excited to announce the results. Running away with the lead was the Patagonia Windchaser: super comfortable, extremely breathable, and very expensive, we had to admit its superiority. Our Best Buy Award Winner, The North Face Reaxion Amp, is a fraction of the cost and surprisingly comfortable and quick to dry. We also loved the Smartwool PhD Ultra Light, a merino wool/ synthetic blend that is naturally odor-free and super cozy.
Best Overall Running Shirt
Patagonia Windchaser - Women's
Out of the box, we couldn't believe how light and airy the Patagonia Windchaser was, and as the weeks of testing ticked by, we only grew more and more impressed. We found this shirt to dry extremely quickly, and no matter how hot and sweaty our workouts, we always felt fresh in this shirt. With a superbly comfortable torso below a silky smooth collar and sleeves, this top was incredibly comfortable on our bodies. Our testers loved the fit, which was spot-on for sizing and not too loose or constricting. With hidden taped seams, the Windchaser kept us free from sore spots or chafing.
The only negative thing we can say about this shirt is related to its versatility, or lack thereof. A limited amount of stretch in the chest, back, and sleeves, coupled with a looser fit, makes for comfortable running but less than ideal hiking and climbing. For any activity requiring a fuller range of motion, the Windchaser wouldn't be our first pick. But, this is a running shirt review after all, and for a hot day on the track or trails, we can't imagine a better companion.
Read review: Patagonia Windchaser - Women's
Best Bang for the Buck
The North Face Reaxion Amp V-Neck
While traveling in Argentine Patagonia, The North Face Reaxion quickly became one of our favorite pieces for just about anything the mountains could throw at us. Whether we were climbing in the mountains, running in the hills, or sprinting to catch a bus, we knew that the Reaxion had our backs. Its design was one of our favorites: form-fitting but stretchy with an attractive cut, and we found it relatively quick to dry and always odor-free. The best news? This was also one of the least expensive shirts we tested for this review, solidifying its spot at the top of our charts.
No, the Reaxion wasn't the most breathable, and no, it wasn't chock-full of running-specific features. But for those looking to shield their wallets from the purge of expensive athletic wear, we found this shirt to be an excellent bargain well-worth the investment.
Read review: The North Face Reaxion Amp V-Neck - Women's
Top Pick for Versatility
Smartwool PhD Ultra Light - Women's
The Smartwool PhD Ultra Light is different than any other model in this review, and at first, we weren't quite sure what to think. Its stretchy merino wool had a cozier feel than its synthetic counterparts, and we were worried about its subsequent breathability. What we found, however, was an incredibly comfortable top that bends and stretches with us no matter what activity we're doing. It wicked moisture away from us while being naturally odor-free, and over weeks of testing, we really grew to love this product.
While not as light as our Editors' Choice Award winner, we found ourselves gravitating toward this shirt for sweaty missions where we needed more maximum flexibility. This top excels as a mountain base layer, especially for long, sweaty missions. At $70, this shirt isn't as friendly on your wallet as it is to your torso, but even the steep price tag couldn't keep us from admitting its excellence.
Read review: Smartwool PhD Ultra Light - Women's
Notable for Comfort
Nike Dri-FIT Tailwind
The Dri-FIT Tailwind top from Nike gave us mixed feelings, but at the end of our testing period, we had to admit how much we liked it. On the one hand, our testers found it to be super soft and luxurious. The cotton/polyester blend was one of the nicest feelings on our skin out of any of the shirts we tested, and we were psyched to keep wearing it long after our workouts ended. We found the fit to be great, albeit a bit loose. The long sleeves and back easily accommodated gym workouts and hiking with a backpack. The holes in the back weren't as gimmicky as we had predicted: they were useful, breathable, and stylish.
On the other hand, the Tailwind was one of the slowest shirts to dry in our controlled line-drying experiment, and the cotton blend makes it a questionable choice for use in the backcountry. Some of our testers found the loose fit less flattering, but overall, we had to make a note of how comfy this top was, even if it wasn't perfectly suited for running.
Analysis and Test Results
The seven awesome shirts we picked for this review are all designed primarily for running, but during our three-month testing period, we often found ourselves venturing out of this designation and wearing these tops for a variety of activities. Many of them function well at the gym as well as in the mountains, though we kept our analysis specific to running.
Before we started testing, we needed to come up with our metrics, or characteristics, that would form the basis for our evaluations. After brainstorming with our co-workers and running buddies, we came up with four of the most important traits in a running shirt: comfort, breathability, drying time, and features/versatility. Once we started testing, we used these characteristics to guide our judgments, thinking about each product's performance in each of these four categories. At the end of our testing period, we awarded each shirt a score of 1-10 in each category, picking a number that describes how each product performed compared to the others in this test. This distinction is important: these scores are relative to other top-performers, as only the most popular models on the market were chosen for testing.
Below, we describe each testing metric in more detail and explain more about what traits we were evaluating. We did our best to approximate the average runner's needs, allotting weighted percentages of the following categories to each product's final score. "Comfort" and "Breathability," therefore, were each designated 30% of each shirt's numerical score, while "Drying Speed" and "Features and Versatility" were each given 20%. If you're looking for something a bit more well-rounded, you'll want to focus your attention more on the "Features and Versatility" section below. If heat is a particularly big issue where you live, "Breathability" may be worth more than 30% to you. Only you know your particular apparel needs, so we encourage you to keep reading to get the skinny on each scoring metric and to delve into each product's full-length individual review for all the details.
One more note: to be consistent, we only chose short-sleeve shirts for this review. It's important to note, however, that many of the shirts we tested are available in other styles, like tanks and long-sleeve as well. Additionally, since this is a women's-specific review, we only used women's products.
As with many of our reviews here at OutdoorGearLab, we found running shirts available in a very wide price range. Our most expensive shirts were almost three times the price of our least expensive ones, but would they perform three times better? Our strategy with this review, as is our standard, was to test every product as blindly as possible. We truly wanted to know how well each product worked, regardless of price. Our testers tried to be as objective as possible, though we had our guesses about price based on the manufacturer. Once we were done testing, we started factoring in price. We consider "value" to be how well a product performs in comparison to its peers in direct relation to its price. After months of testing, we found that the North Face Reaxion, at just $28, was an amazing value. On the other hand, our testers just couldn't get enough of the Patagonia Windchaser, despite its steep price tag. If you're on a tight budget, or if you're just not sure how much you're willing to commit to a running-specific wardrobe, take a look at the chart below to directly compare performance scores to cost.
Running is hard enough, and if you're dealing with uncomfortable clothing, it's just about impossible to motivate to get out the door. And while all of these shirts seemed comfortable enough at first glance, after hours of activewear, we started to notice features that we really liked and disliked. One of the main ways we judge apparel comfort is how noticeable the garment was. If we can run a marathon without thinking about our shirt, the product has largely succeeded. On the other hand, we are quick to notice discomfort, especially after hours of continuous use.
The first characteristic we looked at in this scoring metric was material. We noted what each shirt was made of, whether wool, synthetic materials, cotton, or some combination. Our testers then made notes about how this fabric felt on our skin: Was it itchy? Smooth? Soft? Heavy? We used a lot of qualitative research here and asked friends and fellow runners for feedback on their favorite shirts to wear.
We also looked at the range of motion as a factor of overall comfort. We evaluated not just how stretchy each shirt was but also how it fit. For example, our Editors' Choice Award winner, the Patagonia Windchaser, was one of the least stretchy shirts we tried, but its looser fit allows for a decent range of motion regardless. This feature is closely tied to fit, in which our testers critiqued each top on the way it was cut. Despite all being the same size, we noticed a wide variety of sizes and fits, from tight, form-fitting v-necks to loose, traditional tees. In each individual review, we'll explain the fit of each shirt and how it compares to its competitors, and then make a judgment of which fit was the most appropriate and comfortable for running specifically (as well as other adventure sports).
Last by not least, we talk about seams. Seams come in a variety of types, and in this category, we not only evaluated the type of seams used but also how many seams each shirt had and where they were located. The three main types of seams we found were taped, flatlock, and overlock. Of these, the Windchaser was the only with taped seams. We found these to be incredibly comfortable and smooth, and also potentially indicative of the shirt's high price tag. Next up for comfort is the flatlock seam which we found in the Taema and PhD Ultra Light. This seam is much more expensive than the typical overlock, which we found in the remaining four shirts. We awarded more points for better seams that were placed in locations less prone to rubbing and chafing, like the tops of the shoulders.
At the very top of our comfort charts were two very different products. The Windchaser had an incredibly smooth, light fabric and taped seams that never chafed or rubbed. The Nike Tailwind was the coziest shirt we tried, and its loose fit made it a top choice for lounging or going to the gym. With yet another different fit was The North Face Reaxion, whose tight, stretchy cut was similar but softer than many of its competitors.
To make this review more specific to running, breathability became a very important factor. Even when it's cold outside, running is a sweaty activity, and staying fresh and dry is crucial to its enjoyment. Breathability, as far as this review is concerned, describes how well the shirt allows for air to pass through it, as opposed to drying speed, explained below, which tells us how quickly a shirt dries once saturated.
We wanted to know which shirts could help us beat the heat, so we took a bimodal approach to our evaluations. First, we researched the type of materials used as well as if the product was one cohesive fabric or if it featured panels of different construction. Our experts read reviews and descriptions of each shirt's performance, and then we put our findings to the test.
We ran until we worked up a sweat, and then we kept going. We pushed ourselves as we pushed each product to its limit, and we'll describe each shirt's performance in its individual review. We were most impressed with the Windchaser, whose lightweight material always kept us dry, as well as the Smartwool PhD Ultra Light, constructed of a sleek merino wool that naturally shed moisture. The Marmot All-Around and Reaxion had similar breathability measures; both were snug and constructed with one cohesive fabric, yet still airy enough to let us breathe. We generally preferred looser fits, like that of the Nike Tailwind, as opposed to snug ones, like that of the Brooks Distance.
Now, we realize that this metric sounds a whole lot like the one described above. But, during our testing, we found it important to separate "breathability" from "drying speed," and we'll explain why. As far as our calculations go, "breathability" is the measure of how air passed through a garment, whereas "drying speed" is the measure of how quickly moisture that has accumulated in the shirt dries out.
Aside from making subjective notes on our experience with shirt drying times, this metric required an actual test. We soaked each shirt in a bucket of water, wrung them out by hand, and hung them up to dry. We started the stopwatch, and then we waited. While the end time isn't necessarily important, what we were looking for was comparisons. Our testers wanted to know how quickly each shirt dried in relation to its competitors, and this test was a great indicator.
Like we predicted, the Windchaser from Patagonia had the fastest drying time. Our testers noticed that weight pretty much indicated drying time, which is good to notice if you're shopping and considering another shirt that we haven't tested. After the Windchaser came the Brooks Distance Short-Sleeve, which surprised us because of its partially cotton construction, as well as the Arc'teryx Taema which we expected to be a close contender in this category.
Features & Versatility
Although the main intention of this review was to identify your best apparel choices for running, we here at OutdoorGearLab always appreciate a piece of clothing that we can use for a wider variety of activities. We often find ourselves traveling with little space, and without deep pockets, we like to save money where we can by purchasing things we can use over and over again.
In this scoring category, we first look at any unique features, like reflective markings, sun protection, and odor control, that are particularly suited for the runner. The only shirts we tested with a UPF rating were the Marmot All-Around, at 30 UPF, and the Arc'teryx Taema, at 50+. The PhD Ultra Light, since it is predominantly merino wool, is more naturally odor-free than any other shirt in this review. And while the Windchaser included an odor control in the fabric, none of the other synthetic blends did. Nearly every shirt we tested had reflective logos, but none had big reflective markings that we'd want if we frequently ran at night.
Our testers wanted to know which shirts were best for running, but we were also curious which could be used as base layers for our other favorite outdoor activities. Our Top Pick for Versatility, the PhD Ultra Light, for example, makes for an outstanding base layer for both hot and cold weather, for ski tours or long mountain biking missions. The Windchaser, on the other hand, is perfectly suited for running but is less adaptable to other activities. In order to be versatile, we liked tops that were stretchy and/or looser fitting, to accommodate a wider range of motion than running necessitates. We also agreed that cotton is a big no-no for the backcountry, so we'd avoid the Tailwind and Distance if venturing off the track.
Before you dive into our individual reviews to get to the bottom of your shopping dilemmas, we'd like to make one more note. All seven shirts chosen for this review were among the cream of the crop, topping the charts in popularity from a variety of running's biggest retailers. All of the scores given are relative to each product's competitors, and each has their pros and cons. Remember to identify the most important metrics for your individual purposes and to potentially focus on those scores above our overall rankings.
— Lauren DeLaunay