We buy all the products we test — no freebies from companies. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission, which helps support our testing.
We ran for miles in women's running shorts from On Running, REI, Lululemon, New Balance, and more to find the very best
We hope this review can help you sort through the large variety of running shorts on the market and find a pair to keep you happy for many miles ahead.
Our team of lady runners researched over 40 pairs of the best women's running shorts before buying and rigorously testing 0 to find the optimal pair for your experience and budget. Our experts ran these shorts on dirt roads, paved roads, long mountain loops, and while cross-training to put them to the test. We got to know which pairs outran the competition over hundreds of miles of evaluation. Whether you're starting your running hobby or consistently run dozens of miles a week, we are confident we've made it easy for you to find the right option for your needs.
Editor's note: We updated our women's running shorts article on November 7, 2024, to ensure our lineup was up to date. We're currently testing a new fleet of shorts and will publish our opinions on the new lineup when testing is complete.
We are enamored with many qualities of the REI Co-op Swiftland Running Shorts. Most striking is the unique, gridded, extraordinarily stretchy mesh that makes up the body of the short. The liner material is also extremely soft, stretchy, and breathable. Notably, this short performed wonderfully on hot, humid, and wet runs. Its materials remained soft and did not chafe even when soaking wet. Additionally, we love how the wide waistband of this short sits at the top of the hip, carrying the load of the pockets while resisting shifting and bouncing.
Our gripes with these shorts are few and minor. One place we feel could use improvement regards pocket performance. The three pockets of these shorts perform adequately, but we found the lumbar zip pocket was barely large enough to fit most modern smartphones. If you want more pocket functionality, the New Balance Impact 5" is the one we recommend — it has a smartphone pocket and two smaller elastic pockets. But overall, we think the REI Swiftland short will take you from the road to the trail to cross-training and beyond seamlessly, and we found ourselves reaching for them over and over again.
Our lead tester, Jackie, pushing the limits of the REI Swiftland on a long run in southwest Colorado. We couldn't find a point where the soft and lightweight material disappointed.
We love the high-quality waistband on the New Balance Impact 5". It has many of the features commonly found on pricier options: wide spandex, a large zippered pocket for a phone, and two elastic pockets for snacks, keys, or cards. But all these things come at a price we like. Our testers love the wider waistband because it distributes the pressure and weight of all the things you can fit in these pockets and can be adjusted with the continuous loop drawstring. The 5" inseam also protects from chafing with a lightweight material that dries relatively quickly, doesn't bunch or cling, and has smooth seams to boot.
The New Balance Impact 5" is on the heavier side compared to a few of our other options. The high-performing waistband dries a little slower than the rest of its materials, so expect it to collect some sweat on your run, and these shorts do take a bit longer to dry overall than some of its rivals. Still, if you're looking for a well-performing option that won't break the bank and comes in a wonderful bright blue, the New Balance Impact 5" is a great option. For those who prefer the feeling of a lighter pair, take a look at the breathable and lightweight Patagonia Strider.
The slightly longer inseam of the New Balance Impact 5" might be especially nice for really windy days on the road.
When it comes to long runs, it's no secret that you are going to sweat, and having a material that can wick away your body's moisture is key to keeping you comfortable and dry. The Lululemon Speed Up has just that. A lightweight, crepe-like fabric makes up the body of the short, and a 2.5" wide spandex waistband sits right at the hip, both of which dried just as fast as any other material in the competition. With an elastic edge that grips and lays flat, the crepe liner of these shorts was the most comfortable in our fleet. The curved seaming and overlapping fabric is a clean and flattering cut.
We have a few reservations about these short shorts. If you are prone to chafing, perhaps look for a longer inseam option. The 2.5" inseam doesn't provide much protection against rubbing. Also, these are quite expensive relative to other options. These critiques aside, the Lululemon Speed Up is an amazing lightweight and fast-drying option for your long run days. We found the On Running Shorts was the best option for battling chafing.
The cut of the Lululemon Speed Up is short but surprisingly flattering and comfortable. The short cut and quick drying speed makes them a favorite option for runs that up the mileage.
Soft, stretchy shorts liner that doesn't bunch or ride up
Functional pockets
Wide, comfortable and adjustable waistband
REASONS TO AVOID
Expensive
With a wide, smooth waistband boasting three great pockets, the On Running Shorts feel great right from the get-go. The pockets are very functional, with the rear pocket easily fitting a smartphone and having a key loop to keep your keys secure. From here, they only get better. The waistband expands into a pair of spandex shorts to add additional coverage and security. The liner of these shorts stays put and does not ride up, even on long runs. The quick-drying shell material is cut in clean, sharp lines that create a clean and flattering fit.
We are very impressed with these shorts, but we have a few critiques. Although the liner is extremely quick drying and moisture wicking, the additional material creates more surface area to dry than a brief-style liner. Additionally, these shorts are some of the pricier ones we tested. Small criticisms aside, the On Running Shorts is a well-designed piece for those who prefer extra coverage and protection. If it's unrestrictive quick-drying shorts you're seeking, we also recommend the Patagonia Strider.
The black liner holds fast to the same length as the short and moves with you no matter the length of the run.
Wide, moisture-wicking waistband with infinity drawstring
REASONS TO AVOID
Only one small pocket
Since our testing took place, Patagonia replaced these shorts with the Strider Pro in their lineup. The Pro version is made from recycled polyester and spandex and features three pockets — one on the back of the waistband that is large enough to accommodate a phone, and two small pockets on the waistband for items like an energy packet, key, or credit card. Note that we are linking to the Strider Pro, but the rest of our review refers to the original Strider with fewer pockets. We look forward to testing the Pro version at our next update.
If you are someone who tends to seek the no-frills option, the sleek and lightweight Patagonia Strider is an excellent choice for you. With a mid-length 3.5" inseam and a low-rise waistband, this option feels unrestrictive and light. Not to mention, the infinity waistband lays comfortably when not in use and allows adjustment for the perfect fit. We also loved the fast-drying crepe-like material of this short and liner. The tapered side cut of these shorts also increases their mobility, comfort, and flattering.
The minimal design of the Patagonia Strider also comes with some drawbacks. While there are no bulky pockets to weigh down the shorts, the single pocket only allows room for a couple of small items like keys or cards. The doubled hem tends to chafe where thighs touch at the same height as the hem. This short certainly does not have extra bells and whistles, and if you love that type of simplicity, this is a great choice for you.
The simple, quality construction of the Patagonia Strider won't hold you back. With its quick drying material, this was a great option despite its lack of pockets and extra features.
We really like the lightweight material of the slightly longer Brooks Chaser 7". It's non-restrictive and does not cling or bunch. We also found that the stretchy, meshy, woven material did an adequate job at wicking away sweat and releasing moisture. The longer length combined with this smooth material makes for an excellent barrier to chafing on longer runs. The longer cut is well done. It does not flap out and has a streamlined look.
We find the Brooks Chaser 7" to be slightly lacking in its pocket performance. There is one small pocket in the waist with a water-resistant lining, but we found it would not hold our phone and was better suited for keys or a card. The Brooks Chaser 7" also has two open hand pockets that could hold a lot but were not very useful for running as they bounced too much. Also, the waistband is made of comfortable spandex but lacks a drawcord, so it fits a little large on us. Still, this model provides a longer, modest look with nice materials that protect well against chafing. For the best pocket functionality, you may want to consider the New Balance Impact 5" instead. It also features a wide, drawstring waistband that distributes stashed pocket items evenly.
We think you could wear the Chaser short for not only running, but also biking or hiking and be just as happy.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
Compare Products
When throwing on a pair of shorts for a quick dog run, we found ourselves reaching for the Swiftland again and again.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
How We Test Running Shorts for Women
GearLab has a rigorous and objective process that includes extensive research prior to hands-on testing to decide on a test lineup. Then, tests are broken down into measurable and repeatable metrics to create a reliable testing process. These shorts were tested in a range of conditions. Each option was tested side-by-side on the same 3-mile trail and then worn on runs that ranged from short dirt road rest days to long, high-alpine missions. We also included tests to assess drying times and weighed each model on our scale. We stuffed our phones, keys, and ID cards into the pockets and ran with them to see if they hold these items in place or if they bounce around uncomfortably. We used these test results, combined with our years of running experience, to inform each pair of shorts' scores and subsequent rankings in this review.
To help you find the best running shorts for your experience and needs, we broke down our testing into five rating metrics:
Waistband Liner and Comfort (25% of overall score weighting)
Fit (25% of weighting)
Pocket Functionality (20% of weighting)
Drying Speed (20% of weighting)
Style and Versatility (10% of weighting)
Why Trust GearLab
Our lead tester, Jackie Kearney, spent over a decade running track competitively, including a competitive college career with several NCAA All-American performances. After so many years and miles, she knows what to look for in running short function and form. After college, she moved to the San Juan mountains of Colorado, where she has since transitioned into longer trail runs to supplement her winter passion for ski touring and ski patrolling. Jackie puts down hundreds of running miles annually and has worn dozens and dozens of women's running shorts over the years.
We tested each pair of shorts on the same short road run, trail run and over numerous trails to make our decisions.
A bright array of colors and patterns tested.
Our lead tester on one of the road run controls.
How to Choose Women's Running Shorts
We have compiled five key buying considerations, including size, budget, and features, to help narrow down your next pair of running shorts.
What Inseam Length is Right?
Finding the ideal inseam length is largely a personal choice, but certain running styles are best suited to certain short lengths. For longer trail runs, a longer short will help protect against the elements better and accommodate compression shorts underneath. For road and short trail runs, a shorter inseam provides more maneuverability and breathability for intense running.
Is a Liner Important?
Many running shorts have a built-in liner for improved support and less friction when running. If you do not know whether to buy shorts with liners, consider how prone you are to chafing and whether you notice your shorts moving while running or jogging. It's also important to consider the material and seams in short liners to determine if comfort could become a concern.
Running shorts with built-in liners can help keep your shorts in place when running up or downhill and provide needed support.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
What About the Waistband?
Waistbands are one of the most important aspects of a good running short. When looking at shorts, consider the waistband size and fit to determine their comfort and performance. A wider, large waistband is typically better at preventing shorts from moving and offers a more secure fit. Shorts with more thoughtful waistband designs are typically more expensive. If you plan to prioritize comfort and short security, a good waistband is worth considering.
What to Look for in Pockets?
While running shorts typically prioritize performance over features like pockets, we know some runners want them. If you want to carry small accessories such as energy bars or keys, look for pockets close to the body and pockets oriented within the waistband. These spots will secure belongings better and avoid bouncing accessories while running.
What Material is Best?
All of the shorts in our review offer a blend of synthetic materials meant to aid in performance. Synthetics often offer breathability and are sweat wicking and quick drying. Be wary of cotton, as it can induce chafing and moisture build-up, and it is slow to dry.
A trusty pair of running shorts go a long way in feeling comfortable and performing at your best.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
Analysis and Test Results
More specifically than using each of these pairs for our daily runs, which ranged from short-tempo runs to long trail runs, we evaluated them along the lines of detailed metrics. We used waistband comfort and fit, liner and design comfort, pocket functionality, drying speed, and style and versatility as our metrics for scoring and assessing each model. We used them alongside some of our other favorite running gear to put them through the grinder.
What's the Best Value?
The subtle differences in the design and construction of a running short can make a large difference in performance. A less subtle difference between running shorts is the price. They can range from a relatively inexpensive utility purchase to a price that reflects a top-of-the-line product. We include this metric to help match the reality of performance with the price point.
Notably, the New Balance Impact 5" performed highly across all categories, while coming in at the lower end of the price range in this review. Similarly, the REI Active Pursuits gets the job of a utilitarian running short done at the low end of the price range in this review.
Waistband and Liner Comfort
To determine the waistband and liner comfort, we consider the materials of both and how flat they lie against the skin. We wanted to see how the drawstring, if applicable, felt against the skin and where the shorts sit on the waist. We also know there is nothing better than a liner that can double as underwear you don't even know is there, and nothing worse than a liner that you can't ignore. We were sure to use each pair frequently on all kinds of runs and cross-training but also ran each model three miles on the same trail to have a level comparison.
We found that our favorite options either had a thick spandex waistband that felt secure sitting at or above the hips, like the Lululemon Speed Up, the REI Co-op Swiftland, and the On Running Short, or a lower, unrestrictive waistband like that of the Patagonia Strider.
The snug-fitting liner of the On Running Short.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
The REI Co-Op Swiftland struck an impressive balance between a secure high-waisted feel and lightweight breathability with the continuation of its liner material onto the waistband. On the other hand, we were not impressed by waistbands that were thick and bunched, like the Blooming Jelly, or that fell loosely with no drawstring, like the Rabbit Hopper.
We found that the wider waistbands that sit right above the hip bone, like the Swiftland's, were some of our favorites.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
The Lululemon Speed Up blew away most of the competition with a lightweight crepe liner and smooth elastic edges that we barely noticed were there. The only equal to the Speed Up in terms of the liner is the award-winning REI Co-op Swiftland, which sports an ultra-soft mesh liner. The fuller coverage and smooth chafe protection of the sleek On Running Short also impressed us here. Liners that dug into our waists or seams that did not stretch adequately, such as with the Under Armour Fly By 2.0, scored fewer points here.
The award winning Lululemon liner.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
Fit
There is more to the comfort of a short than the parts that lie directly on the skin. For fit, we evaluated the ways in which all of the elements of the shorts did, or did not, work together. We also noted how the short performed in motion, noting how well it stayed put. We were sure to look for qualities in the cut that would lead to chafing and noting when chafing occurred. We also measured how the claimed inseam lined up with the actual inseams.
We loved how the mid-length inseams of the REI Co-op Swiftland and the On Running Short stayed put and provided some protection against chafing without feeling restrictive. We also like the freedom that came with the angled cut of the Patagonia Strider. We found that shorts with non-stretchy hems like the Underarmour were not our favorites.
The sidecut and wide hem of the Patagonia Strider allowed for great freedom of motion.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
Pocket Functionality
While it's obvious that you won't carry everything you need for a very long run in your shorts, having a couple of pockets for easy access to a gel, a key, a card, or your phone is a nice feature. We find our favorite pockets minimized bouncing and how much we notice the objects we were carrying. They do this by either holding the objects tight to the body or being located in an area with minimal motion, like the lower back or hip. The best pockets do both.
Our favorite pocket assortments were on the On Running Shorts and the REI Co-op Swiftland. These options feature a zipper pocket on the lower back, ideal for a phone, and at least two smaller elastic pockets on the hips for an additional couple of small items.
We love how the thick elastic waistband and overlapping fabric hold phones still in the On Running Short lumbar pocket.
The budget-friendly New Balance Impact also impressed us with three pockets that turned out to be perfectly functional. On the other hand, our least favorites in this department were the Brooks Chaser 7", which has loose hand pockets, and the REI Co-op Active Pursuits with very minimal key pockets.
The zipper pocket on the award-winning Swiftland just fits a modern smartphone.
Drying Speed
It feels good to sweat, but it does not feel good to live in that sweat for the duration of your run. We took note of each pair's moisture-wicking qualities during the testing period. We also performed a side-by-side timed drying comparison of all of these options, soaking each pair and wringing it until no longer dripping, then observing the drying speed comparatively.
The REI Co-Op Swiftland and Lululemon Speed Up once again blew away the competition with their lightweight body and liner that dried faster than all other shorts tested.
We compared the drying speed of each short side by side.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
The gridded knit material of the Swiftland barely holds any moisture and allows extra ventilation, and the Patagonia Strider has a mesh-like pattern to its woven material. Some other models really struggled here. Water clung to the hidden material in the ruched waistbands of the Blooming Jelly and the REI Active Pursuits.
The lightweight of Lululemon Speed Up wicks moisture and dries faster than any other option we tried, which is great for a long, dusty dirt road run.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
Style and Versatility
Style is a personal choice, so we weigh this metric a little less than the previous four. For this metric, we also wanted to think about how each option could transition from your run to everyday wear. We took into account whether they were on track with trends in the industry, how many color options they have, and whether they have any unique patterns.
We found ourselves reaching for the REI Swiftland on pretty much any run we would dream up, making them a highly versatile short that became our daily driver on trails and paved paths. We wore them as soon as they were clean. They also work well for gym workouts and exercise classes. They definitely have a runner-forward appearance, but perhaps that's what you get when you focus on running performance over all else. We're fine with that.
Bright earth tones on the Swiftland are right at home for a late fall desert run.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
The streamlined On Running Short also made a splash here with its laser-clean edges and minimal look. We found ourselves reaching for this short even when we just needed to throw something on to go to the grocery store. We felt like the Under Armour Fly By 2.0 missed the mark here, as its piped edges and color options were somewhat lacking contemporary style.
Laser clean side cuts on the On Running Short give it an updated look.
Credit: Jacqueline Kearney
Conclusion
Whether you typically run a few miles a week or log a few dozen, having a comfortable and reliable pair of running shorts will significantly improve your enjoyment on the pavement or trails. Several factors go into making great running shorts, but everyone's needs will vary to some extent. Be sure to focus on the metrics that matter to you most when considering which might be the best pair for you. After all the miles we ran in these shorts, we hope that we can help you find those that enable you to log many happy miles as well.
