Choosing AT ski bindings is thoroughly mystifying. For 2019, we purchased and sized up 8 of the best ski bindings, summarizing months of testing and hundreds of thousands of vertical feet of real-world backcountry skiing. Over the years we have assessed dozens of bindings. The market is larger and larger, the equipment looks entirely unfamiliar to even very experienced resort skiers, and the designs change and adjust each season. Just look at weight: tested bindings span weights between .7 and 3.3 pounds, with products on the market beyond these numbers in both directions. There are certifications to understand, and questions about your own real and anticipated backcountry ski patterns to address. In short, it's complicated. We keep track of the entire backcountry ski binding market, look them all over, and select the best of the best to review and compare. To organize our thoughts and your decision, we assess ski bindings for uphill performance, downhill performance, weight, ease of use, and durability. When you mash our assessment of each of these together you get a real good picture of the binding landscape and of how each product might work for you.
The Best Bindings for Backcountry Skiing
|Price||$499.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 3 sellers
|$428.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$575.00 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$349.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$449.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 3 sellers
|Pros||Light, solid, just the right set of features||Solid, reliable ski bindings, excellent toe piece entry and easy heel lifter transitions||Simple, reliable design, familiar usability, for long-time users of tech bindings||Surprisingly durable for how light they are, killer price, lighter than most||Simple and reliable|
|Cons||Not ideal for truly hard-charging downhill skiers||No ski brake option, heavier than bindings with the same or more features||Outdated and complicated transitions, limited customer service||No brake option, heel risers are more of a pain to learn||Sticky heel piece, no brakes, limited heel lift range|
|Bottom Line||This minimalist binding has exactly what most of you should want, and nothing you don’t need.||These Canadian bindings use a now-proven overall design and include the latest of the greatest usability benefits. We only wish they were lighter.||Solid ski touring bindings in a classic configuration; the overall design is proven, but other companies have made updates that enhance usability.||A simple binding design that has been proven over decades now; with an economy of scale and few design changes in many years, these are available for a fraction of the price of others.||These simple bindings are nothing flashy, and that is a good thing.|
|Rating Categories||Backland Tour||G3 Ion LT 12||Guide XS Stopper||Speed Turn 2.0||Dynafit TLT Speed|
|Touring Performance (30%)|
|Downhill Performance (25%)|
|Ease Of Use (15%)|
|Specs||Backland Tour||G3 Ion LT 12||Guide XS Stopper||Speed Turn 2.0||Dynafit TLT Speed|
|Weight (pounds for pair)||1.82||2.13||2.13||1.63||1.32|
|Tech or Frame?||Tech||Tech||Tech||Tech||Tech|
|Release Value Range||"Men", "Women", "Expert"||5 to 12||3.5 to 7||4 to 10||6 to 12|
This is our biggest AT Ski Binding review overhaul in years. We are at a turning point with binding reviews and in the binding business in general. In our opinion and observations, the "Frame style" bindings are taking their last gasps. This year's selection does not include any frame bindings. Some are still on the market, but, given our review agenda and style, we do not have any here for full comparison. Sprinkled through our content you will read references to frame bindings, but mainly in terms of how obsolete they have become. Later in 2019, we will likely add a frame binding or two back in. Enough about what isn't in our review. This season, we tested the latest and the greatest and shook up our test team. Building on OGL OG Ian Nicholson's deep experience and impassioned assessment of the state of the market, fellow IFMGA Guide and perennial OutdoorGearLab backcountry ski gear reviewer Jediah Porter has stepped into the lead editor position. Jed's perspective complements Ian's. With a thorough examination of the options, we have new award winners and fresh looks at old favorites. The Atomic Backland Tour makes a dramatic entry to our review list and walks away with a shake-up win of the Editors' Choice award. The Fritschi Tecton displaces the Marker KingPin for our Top Pick (for maximum downhill performance) honor. The Dynafit Speed Turn holds onto the Best Buy award while new entry Plum Tech Race 150 takes another Top Pick award for super light applications.
Best Alpine Touring / AT Bindings for Backcountry Skiing Review
Atomic Backland Tour
We consider a full function AT binding to be one that has optional brakes, adjustable release, adjustable boot sole length, and three touring heel levels. The Atomic Backland Tour (and identical, but co-branded, Salomon Mtn) is the lightest binding we have ever tested with all four of these key attributes. It is lightest by quite a bit. That attribute means a lot. It was easy to grant this our Editors Choice award, and it is easy to recommend these bindings to you.
Now, this choice may be a little intimidating. First, these bindings are fairly minimal in appearance. Fear not, as we have tested them thoroughly and have had no performance or durability issues. If anything, the simple construction is its greatest performance and durability attribute. Next, there is no certification of the release values. So-called "DIN" certification is something that alpine skiers are conditioned to look for. And this binding does not have that. In order to attain that certification, though, the bindings need to be almost double the weight. That is not worth it. These bindings release. Further, if you feel you need certified release to ski as hard as you want, you are likely skiing harder in the backcountry than maybe you should be. The backcountry is a high consequence environment regardless of the certification your bindings have. Nonetheless, if you absolutely insist on having high-energy downhill performance and DIN certification, check out the Top Pick Black Diamond Fritschi Tecton.
Read full review: Atomic Backland Tour
Best Bang for the Buck
Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0
The Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0 is the best deal available for a tech-style binding, costing $200-$300 less than most other models. It doesn't come with a brake, nor is it compatible with one. But at 1 pound 10 ounces, it's one of the lightest options that has adjustable release value (like the Atomic Backland, the release value of the Speed Turn is not DIN/TUV certified). It is pretty light; ski mountaineers who want to save weight can easily save money and sacrifice very little performance with this binding.
With its tried-and-true yet straightforward design, Speed Turn is built to last, and we wouldn't hesitate to use it on remote trips. However, because of its brakeless design, it takes more skill to deal with the nuances of skiing, transitioning without a brake, or considering a leash in spring conditions. The Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0 is the result of very incremental upgrades and refinements over 30 years of development. Speed Turn bindings don't look much different than the Dynafit tech bindings of the early 1990s. That is a good thing.
Read review: Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0
Top Pick for the Ultimate Quiver of One
Black Diamond Fritschi Tecton 12
If you'll only have one set up for everything, and you tour and resort ski roughly half and half, the Fritschi Tecton is the binding for you. Even if you backcountry ski more than half the time, the Tecton might have appeal. It is tied with the Marker KingPin for downhill performance, offering energy transmission and release performance that almost matches the frame style bindings, at a fraction of the weight. In fact, it is weight that edges the Tecton ahead of the KingPin and therefore earns it this Top Pick award. The Tecton weighs about 100g less than the Kingpin.
The Tecton wasn't the runaway winner, receiving strong contention from the KingPin for this award. However, the Fritschi won because it features some of the best downhill performance while maintaining typical tech binding uphill efficiency and it is relatively lightweight (3.06 lbs). For resort experiences, the Tecton is one of the safer tech bindings and has a DIN/ISO rated release. If you are planning on using the Tecton exclusively for backcountry applications, consider the weight more closely. When there are options out there that are literally 1/4 the weight, you need a real good reason to select this three-pound behemoth. In terms of downhill performance, the Tecton really does do better than lighter options. However, in our testing and the broad experience of our consulted team, the downhill performance attributes will not be realized by any but the absolute most hard-charging skiers. Even most expert resort skiers do not ski (nor should they ski) in the backcountry hard enough to realize the advantages of the Tecton and the KingPin. In these cases, cases that represent the vast majority of backcountry skiing, the extra downhill performance is really just extra weight.
Read review: Black Diamond Fritschi Tecton 12
Top Pick for Ultralight Applications
Plum Race 150
For the no-compromise pursuit of lightweight ski gear, looking to the "skimo" race market is the way to go. The Plum Tech Race 150 is straight out of that business, with wider applications. Expert backcountry skiers (those with true big, wild mountain experience and patience for gear) will notice only advantages of this lightweight choice, in all but the most high-energy downhill situations.
Lightweight gear is compromised gear. There are no ski brakes, no adjustable release, no room for boot length adjustment (though Plum makes a model 20 grams heavier, and otherwise the same, that leaves some room for adjustment at the heel), and only one level of 'touring lift' at the heel. These compromises, again for experienced skiers, are well worth the weight savings. If skiing is good, more skiing is better. And lighter gear allows more climbing, which equals more skiing.
Read review: Plum Race 150
Analysis and Test Results
We tested, and review here, bindings for backcountry skiing. The definition of "backcountry skiing" can be many things. We define it pretty broadly, taking a variety of things into account. We consider world-wide and historical usage patterns but also weight more heavily the current style of backcountry skiing in the United States. For us, backcountry skiing is at least mostly human powered. You may take a lift to start your day, but you will spend hours skinning uphill. Short boot packs and wild snow accessed from mechanized means don't really factor in.
Any skier skiing near or at his or her downhill ability is operating beyond our definition of "backcountry skiing". Wilderness skiing is high consequence skiing. Pushing the limits with speed, air, steepness, or tricks brings a high likelihood of injury or worse. High consequence and high likelihood makes for high-risk skiing. A backcountry skier considers risk carefully. This deserves mention here because of the downhill performance attributes of different AT ski bindings. Regardless of your actual downhill ability, skiing within your limits is totally possible in even the simplest of touring bindings. Only when one is at or near his or her downhill ability do the retention and release characteristics of the more sophisticated bindings come into play. Those skiing at or near their abilities in the wild are taking risks likely more significant than those mitigated by more sophisticated bindings.
Some will want to own just "backcountry" ski gear for all their skiing. Depending on your ratio of in-bounds to backcountry skiing, this may work ok for you. If your resort visits are less than 25% of your skiing and your bindings include ski brakes, using backcountry gear for everything is likely ok. If you want lighter gear for touring or ski the resort a ton, get dedicated resort gear and dedicated touring gear.
Our goal here is to outline the best bindings and walk you through the selection process, for what we call backcountry skiing. If your definite is different, you might need different equipment. "Tech" style bindings are now king. "Frame" style bindings look more familiar but are heavier, less efficient, and increasingly harder to find. For 2018 we only review "tech" style bindings. Get a good education on their use, and you will be a quick convert.
Only some AT ski bindings are "DIN" certified. All bindings release in some way or another, for injury prevention, but not all have that release function certified by a third party. For some, "DIN" certification is crucial. This is likely an emotional or business/liability choice. In practical terms, our highly experienced test team can assure you that DIN rating is not required for even the most extreme of backcountry and ski mountaineering. Nonetheless, you have expensive and weighty DIN certified options.
Finally, before we dive into our individual review criteria, we implore you to use all backcountry skiing equipment according to the manufacturer's recommendation. As it pertains to ski brakes, leashes, toe piece locks, and mounting, a manufacturer's instructions are specific and essential. Think critically about your risk exposure in all aspects of your backcountry skiing, but abide the manufacturer's recommendations.
AT ski bindings span a wide range of prices. Price increases in two directions. As bindings get lighter, they get more expensive. In the other direction, bindings get both more expensive and heavier with safety and downhill performance. The least expensive bindings are simple and light, but not super light. Paradoxically, there is an inverse relationship between price and durability. Normally we might expect more expensive products to last longer. With ski bindings, though, the most proven and long-lasting bindings in our review are those that are the absolute cheapest. Subtract weight from something like the Best Buy Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0 and it gets more expensive and less durable. Add features to that same binding, and it gets more expensive and less durable.
For our touring comparison, we tested and compared the pivot point of each binding, touring range of motion, and the binding's resistance to icing up during wet or stormy days. We kept weight, ease of use, and transitions separate for this comparison category even though these things also affect touring performance.
The pivot point of the binding is key for efficiency because it allows you a more natural stride. Frame bindings have a pivot point that is slightly out in front of the toe of the boot, forcing the user to have a slight "tip-toe" effect. Whereas all tech have a pivot point that is slightly further back and more under your toes. This aft-located pivot provides a much more optimal and efficient stride, saving you energy and reducing fatigue on your leg muscles. All the tech bindings have basically the same pivot point, and minor differences in that pivot point is more dependent on the boot construction than on the binding design. Pivot point is a criterion we discuss in comparing frame bindings to tech bindings. Since, for 2018, we didn't test any frame bindings, we have no real significant pivot point comparisons to note.
Touring Range of Motion
Some touring moves require more hinge range at the toe than others. A "normal" touring stride just requires a little bit of heel lift and all the bindings we tested allow enough for this. Steep uphill terrain requires specialized "kick turn" technique. The most efficient kick turners get the tip of the ski to their knee (and the tip of the toe of their boot, therefore, near the top sheet of the ski) during a kick turn. Most bindings we tested allow all the range of motion you need. However, there are notable exceptions to this rule. The complicated toe piece of the Top Pick Fritschi Tecton has bulk and parts that limit the range of motion. In efficient kick turning this compromised range of motion is noticeable and unfortunate. The close competitor Marker KingPin has less range of motion than other bindings but more than the Tecton. All the other award winners, including the Editors Choice Atomic Backland Tour have all the range of motion you need.Resistance to Icing
We compared how each contender resisted to icing. All bindings ice up to some extent and need to be chipped free from time to time. Frame bindings are the worst with this, with complicated tech bindings coming in next. The simplest, lightest bindings in our review are also the least prone to icing. The Tecton and KingPin bindings have more moving parts that collect ice. Any binding with brakes is more prone to icing than those without brakes. The brake locking mechanism of the Plum Guide XS collects ice in such a way as to disengage said brake lock. What this means is that, while touring, sometimes the ski brake is deployed. This requires taking the ski off, scraping the ice, and re locking the brake away.
The ultra-low profile heel piece of the Top Pick Plum Tech Race 150 collects virtually no ice. In sticky snow conditions, the Best Buy Dynafit Speed Turn gathers ice that simulates informal "heel lifts", even when the binding is in low tour mode. All "traditional" tech toes collect ice under the center of the toe piece. This manifests as toe pins that won't close entirely. In this case, the ski needs to be removed, turned upside down, and the ice cleared out. It may appear that your boot toe holes are full of ice or dirt, but the more likely culprit is ice beneath the toe piece. The Dynafit Speed Turn and Plum toe pieces are especially vulnerable to this problem. For some reason, the G3 Ion LT seems less prone to icing than nearly every other binding we have used. The Atomic Backland Tour also gave us virtually no icing problems.
For our downhill performance score, we compared how well each AT binding performed on the down. We divide our assessment into two main categories: how does the binding perform in "routine" downhill, and how is it designed and built to work when release is required?While most felt great in softer snow, we made sure to compare them in harsh, icy, and variable snow and at higher speeds where our testers could feel more of a difference. There are several factors contributing to downhill "routine" performance that include, but aren't limited to the overall rigidity of the design, amount of elasticity of a binding, its stack height, and the ramp angle/heel-toe-delta. A more rigid connection between ski and boot lends better downhill performance. Binding "elasticity" is the distance your boot can move, within the binding, before it is released. Some binding elasticity allows the boot to get deflected by normal skiing forces and then return to center for the next turn. With theoretical zero elasticity, every lateral boot force past some threshold would result in a complete release. This is undesirable, as normal skiing forces "appear", to a binding, to be the same as the forces associated with an injuring fall. Your binding cannot "decide" which forces are leading to an injury and which forces are just "normal". Elasticity gives you some time, measured in split seconds. If the force is short lived, you won't get injured and the elasticity of the binding will pull your boot back in line. If that force continues, the ski comes off and the force is relieved before it is transmitted to your bones and connective tissues. Of course, binding release isn't perfect and people get injured all the time. This is a risk you must be willing to take.
Release performance is difficult to objectively assess, as we can simply not crash enough to collect reliable data. What we look for here is first certification standards. Then we consider range of adjustment and type of non-certified release methodology.
AT bindings that have a more positive connection as well as more surface area (touching both between the boot and the binding) within the binding itself, and between the binding and the ski, generally perform better. Only the Fritschi Tecton and Marker KingPin have the sole of the skier's pressing onto the ski. They also provide some "forward pressure" that assists in the elasticity of the binding. The G3 Ion LT also provides some simulated "forward pressure" that, theoretically at least, lends some elasticity. In our testing, the remainder of the bindings have the same downhill performance, as it pertains to positivity of connection and elasticity.
Binding geometry varies from one product to the next. Each binding puts your boot sole a different distance from the ski, and each binding has a different "heel-toe-delta". The distance between boot sole and ski top sheet is called "stack height". While some ski racers like more stack height, most skiers, especially backcountry tourers, prefer to be closer to the ski. This gives the user better balance and "feel". Generally speaking, most manufacturers compete to see who can get the lowest stack height possible. The more sophisticated tech bindings have a greater stack height. The Kingpin, Tecton, Plum Guide, and G3 Ion LT all have stack heights over 39mm. The simpler Speed Turn, and Atomic Backland bindings keep your foot closer to the ski. The lightest bindings have the lowest stack heights. The Top Pick Plum Tech Race 150 is two full centimeters lower than the other Top Pick Tecton.
Ramp angle is the angle between your boot sole and the ski top sheet. This depends on boot size, boot sole geometry, and binding construction. We focus here on the binding component of this equation. The binding affects your ramp angle in that different bindings have different relative toe and heel heights. We call the difference between toe and heel height "toe heel delta" and we measured this by measuring the distance from ski surface to the center of the toe pins and to the center of the "effective" heel pins (not all bindings have heel pins). AT bindings tend to feature a greater toe-heel-delta than most downhill bindings to help make up for generally softer, less aggressive and forward leaning boots. Unless you know you have strong preferences in ramp angle and you know your boot geometry and boot size (as it pertains to ramp angle), we don't recommend thinking too much about binding toe-heel-delta. If you know it matters to you, realize that the Plum Tech Race as really low binding delta and the Dynafit Speed Turn and Plum Guide XS both have really high binding delta. Otherwise, the remainder are fairly similar to one another, falling in the middle and sitting within a few millimeters of each other.
There are three main categories of AT bindings, in terms of release. First, there are those that have no adjustment to the release. The Plum Race 150 is in this category. Next, there are those with adjustable release, but no certification. Most touring binding models are in this category. Finally, there are the bindings that have ISO/DIN certification of their release. The Marker KingPin and Fritschi Tecton are the only bindings we reviewed that have this external, third-party endorsement of their certification.
Ease of Use
Ease of use is summed up (you guessed it) by how easy the bindings were to use. How easy they were to step into and out of, as well as how easy it was to transition to touring or downhill again. We also compared how easy it was to deploy the heel risers.
Ease of Entry and Exit
Ease of entry for tech bindings is hands down where the G3 ION takes the cake and was the feature that impressed us the most about that binding. Instead of nearly all other tech bindings where you need to either "hook" one side, or line up your toe holes and use downward pressure to engage the front pins, the ION features two vertical levers that when lightly pressured, engage the side pins. For folks that struggle with getting into tech bindings, we think the ION is the answer. The toe piece of the Fritschi Tecton is engineered entirely different, but the end result is similar in terms of ease of entry. Its spring-loaded closure was very sensitive and when most folks first start trying to use it, their toe closes before their boot is in position. Once accustomed to it, getting into the Tecton goes smoothly.
The Marker Kingpin was likely the next easiest of the tech bindings to get into. Similar to the Dynafit TLT Speed, it features two "posts" that help line your boot up correctly. The toe piece of the Atomic Backland Tour has a sort of guide that helps you to line up the toe pins.Ease of transitioning from up-to-down and down-to-up
Different products have different advantages while transitioning, after skinning up to skiing down, and then once you've finished your run at the bottom while transitioning back to skinning up.
Where it Matters
From up to down matters more; nearly every backcountry tour will have at least one of these types of transitions. Many skiers regularly take their skins off without having to take off their skis; a binding that allows you to do this is an advantage, particularly while in deep snow, where if you step down with a "ski-less" foot, you will plunge up to your hip (we've all been there) in snow. On the flip side, it's extremely difficult to put skins on your skis while they remain on your feet, so being able to transition on this end more quickly is a slightly overrated, over publicized feature. The one time we dig being able to go into "cross country" mode where you want your heel free, but no skins on, is during the descent and while traveling on long, flat, snow-covered roads and frozen lakes.
The Atomic Backland Tour transitions pretty easily but requires an extra step with the brakes. The brakes must be manipulated by hand every time you switch from down to up or vice versa. The Fritschi Tecton snapped between walk and tour mode very easily whether below our feet or in our hands. Transitions with the Plum Guide XS require turning the heel piece and dealing with a button-and-slider mechanism that contains the brakes during tour mode. Transitions with the super simple Plum Tech Race 150 are quick and easy.
We also compared how easily each heel risers engaged and disengaged. All but one of the products we tested for 2018 have three levels of touring mode. All the bindings we tested have a "flat on ski" mode, except for the Top Pick Plum Race 150. We compared how easily the heel risers were to engage and disengage while using our poles, ideally so we wouldn't have to bend over when we wanted to use them. As a whole, manufacturers have taken note of the consumer desire for easier and quicker to engage heel risers and have answered with continuously easier-to-use designs. The G3 Ion LT, Fritschi Vipec, Fritschi Tecton, Atomic Backland Tour, and the Marker Kingpin had by far the easiest to engage and disengage risers. The Dynafit TLT Speed has three levels of heel risers, and they flip back and forth to change. However, the difference between lowest and highest is more like the difference between lowest and middle of the Plum Guide or Dynafit Speed Turn and the flipped heel livers are difficult to "grab" with your pole.
The Plum Guide and Speed Turn both require twisting the heel piece to change modes. This is seen as "outdated" and is indeed more complicated to learn, and it is much harder to change between mid and high levels on the twist style than on the flip style. We'd like to point out a critical examination of these twist style lifters. If your most common heel lifter change is (and it should be) between low and mid, and you practice extensively with both, our test team can confidently report that the twist style heel lifters are actually faster to change than the flip style lifters.Ski Crampons
Depending on where you live and how much springtime touring and ski mountaineering you do, ski crampons can matter a tremendous amount or very little. We find ourselves rarely bringing ski crampons mid-winter while conditions are consistently cold and we are often skiing at or below treeline while basically looking for powder. However, once the melt-freeze cycle starts and you start thinking about skiing corn or higher elevation mountains, ski crampons can save you a tremendous amount of effort. Ease of use rating considers the option of employing ski crampons.
While weight is a factor regarding touring performance, we kept it separate for our OutdoorGearLab scoring purposes. More than most other types of gear, the difference in weight from one binding to another is quite large. Look at the 2.5 lbs difference between our review's lightest binding, the Plum Tech Race (.7 lbs), and the heaviest, the Marker KingPin (3.2 lbs). That 2.5 lbs of difference is the weight of a tent!!!! The Marker, while the heaviest in our review, isn't even the heaviest touring binding on the market, nor is the Tech Race the lightest. Overall touring on lighter bindings is noticeably easier. The old saying of "A pound on your foot is like five on your back" runs at least slightly true, as people can endure noticeably more vertical with less weight on their feet.
Weight is where most tech style bindings have a significant advantage over their frame style counterparts, as there is always less mass. On top of absolute binding weight, you are not lifting the weight of the frame (which is attached to your boot) every step with tech binders, which is providing better efficiency. There is also a significant difference among tech bindings, especially when comparing our Editors' Choice, the Atomic Backland Tour (1.8 lbs), to the Marker Kingpin (3.2 lbs), and the G3 Ion LT (2.1 lbs). The Kingpin and Tecton have all the same major features as the Backland, but weigh much much more. The G3 includes fewer features and weighs more.
The Atomic Backland Tour earns our Editors' Choice award in great part due to its weight. It is nearly as light as the Best Buy Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0, but it features a brake. Mount it without that optional brake, and it is much much lighter than any other binding we assessed. We have scoured the market and have found no other binding with the feature set of the Backland that is lighter.
For absolute light weight performance, check out the Top Pick Plum Race 150. Unmounted, these bindings look more like jewelry than technical equipment. They are that tiny.
For our durability test, we did our best to compare how burly each product was. For this comparison, we not only pooled our own experience, but talked to over a half dozen reputable backcountry ski shops, mountain guides, and a handful of reps; we wanted to see what broke, how often, and on which models. Overall, there is a pretty strong correlation between durability and simplicity. Simple, proven products will last better. The Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0 shares the bulk of its working design with decades of lineage. It is a proven design, and has been shown to go for literally millions of vertical feet of ski touring. In either direction, weight-wise, from the Dynafit Speed Turn, durability suffers. Go lighter, and you risk issues. Bindings heavier than the Speed Turn weigh more because of added features. Added features add more things to fail.
Among our testers going on long, super remote tours, we'd still reach for the tried-and-true design of the Dynafit Speed Turn which has proven its durability and has relatively few problems for the number out there. The Atomic Backland Tour is a relatively new product, but it employs largely proven technology. In our extensive testing, so far, we have had no issues with the Backland. We are confident that the Atomic will be a durable legend.
Both the Tecton and the Kingpin had a few early, fairly significant issues with the glue holding the front pins in position, though both companies seem to have dealt with that issue. Some versions of the Marker KingPin are currently under recall. Marker seems to be standing by the product, but this is a real issue for some products in some circumstances.
Competitors like the G3 ION and the Marker Kingpin haven't quite been around long enough, nor are the same numbers of them for us to see 100% how they compare in durability for the long haul. Thus far, the Kingpin has impressed us with how durable and long-lasting it could turn out to be. Most of its aluminum parts are gold that is sourced and produced by the climbing company DMM in Wales. This shows us that Marker cares quite a bit about the production quality of this product. The Fritschi Tecton is a little less robust feeling than the Marker KingPin, mainly because of more extensive use of plastic in the construction. This plastic makes it lighter weight. We have yet to have any problems with the Tecton and durability.We had one quality/durability issue with the Plum Race 150. On one very long ski tour, a tester had his boot get stuck in tour mode in the binding. Fortunately, we were skinning (miles and miles) back to the car when this happened. At the car, this tester removed his foot from the ski and left it all together. It required bench, vise, and a pile of tools to extract the boot. Rumors of a replacement part that prevents this issue dot the internet, but securing said replacement part required tapping into our network of industry contacts and patience. We are still not sure that the new part is actually different than the stock part and that it guards against the issue we experienced. Finally, we were only issued one replacement part. If the issue is inherent to the binding, both parts should be replaced. We did not have a favorable experience with US Plum customer service nor with initial quality control.
Before purchasing a pair of AT bindings, you need to determine where you will be using them and how much emphasis you place on the respective tasks of AT bindings. Think of uphill, downhill, and durability cost. The tests and ratings in this review are designed to help you make this decision and find the pair of bindings that best fit your needs.
— Ian Nicholson and Jediah Porter