Plum Pika Review
Cons: No certified release, no high-heel lift, moderate weight
Compare to Similar Products
|Price||$539 List||$550 List||$449.99 at Amazon||$575 List||$350 List|
|Pros||Two heel levels, adjustable length and release, optional brakes||Light, solid, just the right set of features||Light, innovative downhill performance||Super light, adjustable for length, proven design, widely available||Surprisingly durable for how light they are, killer price, lighter than most|
|Cons||No certified release, no high-heel lift, moderate weight||Not ideal for truly hard-charging downhill skiers||unsophisticated heel lifters, untested aftermarket brake||No brakes, limited release adjustment, no heel lifters||No brake option, heel risers are more of a pain to learn|
|Bottom Line||Simple, classic bindings employing a modern feature set and robust construction||This minimalist binding has exactly what most of you should want, and nothing you don’t need||Excellent bindings for all-around human powered skiing||They suffer none of the special problems we’ve encountered in other ultralight bindings||A simple binding design that has been proven over decades now, available for a fraction of the price of others|
|Rating Categories||Plum Pika||Atomic Backland Tour||Marker Alpinist 12||Black Diamond Helio...||Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0|
|Touring Performance (30%)|
|Downhill Performance (25%)|
|Ease Of Use (15%)|
|Specs||Plum Pika||Atomic Backland Tour||Marker Alpinist 12||Black Diamond Helio...||Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0|
|Weight (pounds for pair)||1.36 lbs||1.26 lbs||1.18 lbs||0.8 lbs||1.63 lbs|
|Weight of one binding, grams||308g|
|Release value range||4 to 10||"Men", "Women", "Expert"||6 to 12||6, 8, 10||4 to 10|
|Stack height. (mm. average of toe and heel pin height)||36||37||36||33||38|
|Toe/Heel Delta. (mm difference in height between heel pins and toe pins)||9||10||3||7.5||17|
|Brake options||85, 95, 105 mm||80, 90, 100, 110, 120||90, 105,115 mm||No Brakes||No Brakes|
|Ski Crampon compatible?||With aftermarket part. Best with Plum brand. "Standard" Dynafit/B&D style ski crampons can be lightly filed to work.||Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D style.||Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D style.||Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D style.||Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D style.|
Our Analysis and Test Results
The Plum Pika enters the binding fray right at the hot spot. In terms of weight and function, the category of stripped down, adjustable bindings that weigh under a pound and a half for a pair (not counting optional brakes) is "going off". More and more options appear and the quality and function continue to improve. Plum's entry is great, and we review it here.
When we assess touring performance we investigate heel lifters, pivot range of motion, and icing propensity. In all of these categories, the Plum Pika is almost exactly average. It can be toured flat on ski or with one moderate lift level. Beginner skinners and those in stiffer boots like a higher heel lifter that the Pika doesn't have. Lighter bindings don't have the options that the Pika has. The minimalist construction ices less than more involved bindings, but more than ultra-simple options. There is absolutely no meaningful limit to the toe range of motion in the Pika.
Downhill performance is a function of boot retention and of release value. Does the binding hold your boot in when you want and let it go when you need it to? We can speak with authority on the former. We skied miles of serious terrain and never came out of the Pika. We skied just enough firm snow to know that the retention "feel" is satisfactory. More sophisticated, bulkier bindings definitely feel both more secure and more "damp" in their retention.
We can't yet comment from direct experience on the release performance of the Pika. We can point out that Plum equips the Pika with adjustable lateral and vertical heel release. The release values seem to roughly mirror "DIN" numbers, but the binding is not certified to DIN standards. Certification in bindings this light is unheard of. You have to more than double this weight to get ISO/TUV certification to DIN standards.
Ease of Use
Can you get in, out, and make necessary adjustments? With the Plum Pika the short answer is "yes". Entry and exit are average. Other, more sophisticated bindings are easier to get in and out of. But, none of them are as simple and light as the Pika. Length and release adjustments are clear and employ commonly available tools.
We measured, on a calibrated OGL scale, the Plum Pika bindings to each weigh 308 grams. That's 1.36 pounds for the pair. On a ranked list of all those we review, that is about halfway. The heaviest bindings are three times the weight, while the lightest are a little over half the weight of the Pika. The Pika is light, but not ultralight. In comparison to those of similar weight, the Pika has similar performance and function. Nothing about the Pika is an outlier. This is a good thing.
Plum's primary appeal, in some circles, is that their bindings are all metal in construction. This gives many the "warm fuzzies", in terms of durability. The fact is that simple, well-built tech bindings are way more durable than their appearance might suggest, regardless of materials. Plum's all-metal construction is robust, but so are other options that include some plastics and composites.
Bindings in this general category are proven, robust, and offer great performance. The Pika will last you a long time, won't break the bank, and employs proven technology and overall design. The initial purchase price might be shocking for how small the equipment is. However, all the truly comparable options are similar in price and the performance belies the tiny form factor.
We recommend the Plum Pika. It isn't the most sophisticated nor does it bring exciting innovation. The proven simplicity and carefully tailored selection of features is its appeal; this is a new product in a classic and reliable form.
— Jediah Porter