We test and write these reviews trying to be as objective and specific as possible, and try to cover the bases of how anyone might use these products. However, your goals may differ from ours, so be sure to take a look at the performance metrics that you consider most important for your needs. Below we show you how we tested each product so that you can better understand the ratings we've given.
For warmth, we rated each bag on its absolute warmth, ignoring the manufacturer's temperature ratings (which we found were not always very indicative of performance). To do this, we slept in these bags outside in the mountains during the cold spring months and the high desert in late October. The shoulder seasons in the high mountains of the Colorado Rockies, the Colorado Plateau, and the Himalayas are not warm, so we came to understand how well these bags worked by suffering in them. Many people have slept in each bag, and we kept notes on where we slept and what the overnight low was and compared them to how we felt and what clothing we wore inside the bags. This information helped paint us a clear picture about warmth, but to attempt to verify our findings objectively, we performed the ice bottle test, where we put an entirely frozen Nalgene water bottle inside each bag and left them lying in the shade on a hot day for an hour. We then made a note of how much the ice had melted during that time to help us fine-tune our understanding of which bags were the most insulated. We further amended our opinions by analyzing the function of heat-trapping features(or lack thereof), such as draft tubes, fully enclosed zippers, neck baffles, type of baffle construction, and hoods.
To test for weight, we took each product and weighed it on our independent scale, accurate down to 1/100th of an ounce. Sometimes the readings matched the manufacturer's listed weight; sometimes it didn't. We included all integral pad straps and attachment parts, but we did not factor in the weight of stuff sacks, although those are listed on the specs table. Lower weights scored higher.
When it came to comfort, field testing was once again our bread and butter for determining what worked and what didn't. To ensure objective testing, we had multiple people use each bag and discuss their opinions afterward. A primary consideration was the fit of a bag, and we ordered all bags to the same size specifications so that we could compare them fairly. We attempted to assess for how loose or restrictive a bag was, how pleasant the interior fabric felt against skin and clothing, and whether features like Velcro, zippers, or drawcords affected the comfort level.
When it came to assessing versatility, we first attempted to identify how many different situations a bag could be appropriately used in, and then did our best to test the bag in all those conditions. Our countless nights out in the field were essential for determining how truly versatile a sleeping bag was. For quilts or blankets that had the option of sleeping wrapped up, attached to a pad, or fully spread out, we slept in them each way.
It is easy to take a new sleeping bag out of the box at home and start to play around with it, but not so apparent is whether the neck cinch cord will really stay tightly cinched around your neck all night when you are cold, or whether the hood truly covers your entire head and forehead comfortably, or whether the pad straps will stay fastened and tight all night, rather than coming loose and allowing in cold air. The only way to truly know these things is to test them in the field, which is what we did, over and over again.