The Mad Rock Mad Pad is one of the least expensive medium size bouldering pads we tested and has some of the thickest and stiffest foam out there. It was nearly impossible to "bottom out" on sharp rocks under the pad from any height. For its size, it is relatively light and compact. This is our Best Buy Award winner for bouldering crash pads because it is among the least expensive, most versatile, and well-featured pads available. That said, it is very stiff and low falls can be slightly jarring. If you don't do many tall problems, you might want a more forgiving pad with an angled hinge like the Metolius Session II, or the impressively plush Mad Rock R3. Overall, the Mad Pad has the thickest piece of foam you can get for the money.
Mad Rock Mad Pad Review
Cons: Thick, stiff square cut foam, hard to pack, hinged
Manufacturer: Mad Rock
Compare to Similar Products
Mad Rock Mad Pad
|Price||$174.95 at MooseJaw||$198.95 at MooseJaw||$238.95 at MooseJaw|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$229.95 at MooseJaw|
Compare at 2 sellers
|Pros||Least expensive, compact (small but burly), thick and stiff foam (also a dislike)||Versatility, soft but dense foam with multiple hinges conforms to uneven landing surfaces and cushions short to medium length falls very well. It also hauls a lot of gear well and has handy features||Straps to attach a second pad, plush suspension, sturdy foam for high falls||Large surface area for medium pad, fits plenty of gear, easy-to-use hooks, grippy waterproof backing, strong shoulder straps||Least expensive, turns into comfy couch, innovative way to seal up hinge, big enough to sleep on.|
|Cons||Thick, stiff square cut foam, hard to pack, hinged||Specialized, the soft, squishy, shredded foam and slightly lumpy "baffles" are not the best for some long, high falls - they could possibly roll an ankle||Foam is hard for low falls, stiff for uneven landings||Foam wears out quickly and is relatively thin||Not most comofortable to carry, can't carry much gear.|
|Bottom Line||Excellent value pad with thick foam and no frills.||A unique pad with plush foam and plenty of space for packing gear.||Great crash pad distinguished by its innovative strap system for carrying a second pad.||An excellent all-around pad with good cushioning and plenty of features.||A great large pad that provides a ton of foam at a low price.|
|Rating Categories||Mad Rock Mad Pad||Mad Rock R3||Mad Rock Duo||Black Diamond Drop Zone||Mad Rock Triple Mad Pad|
|High Falls (30%)|
|Low Falls (30%)|
|Packing Gear (10%)|
|Specs||Mad Rock Mad Pad||Mad Rock R3||Mad Rock Duo||Black Diamond Drop...||Mad Rock Triple...|
|Size (inches)||36 x 48||55 x 35||56 x 42||41 x 47||70 x 44|
|Warranty||1 Year||Lifetime limited||1 Year||1 Year||1 Year|
Our Analysis and Test Results
The Mad Pad features the same 5 inch-thick foam as the Mad Rock Duo and R3, with 3 inches of soft open cell foam sandwiched between two harder 1 inch closed cell foam layers. Mad Rock's foam was very stiff and only softened up a bit through our testing. It was great for cushioning the impact of high falls but low falls didn't feel great and landing on your back or tailbone could be pretty jarring on a new pad.
Aside from its impressively thick padding, the Mad Pad's best feature for protecting falls is a full-length velcro strip that runs along the backside of its hinge. This virtually eliminates the hinge and we struggled to think of scenarios where it would fail. Although it makes the pad too rigid for extremely rocky landings we felt better about not having to worry about injuring an ankle in the pad's hinge.
With five inches of firm foam, the Mad Pad is among the stiffest pads we tested. When you put it over a sharp rock it is almost impossible to feel it whether it is a big or small fall. It will soften over time, but not much compared to other pads we tested.
With no closure flaps the Mad Pad is not great for carrying gear but still can accommodate the basic items that most boulderers carry. Smaller items tended to fall through the pad in our testing but we never had issues with loading shoes, chalk bags, and jackets in the Mad Pad.
The Mad Pad was one of the simplest pads we tested and has some useful features. Our favorite is that it can be converted into a couch with two straps that connect opposing corners. This is great for hanging out around camp and between bouldering sessions.
One of the cool features not found on many other pads is the Velcro attachments on the sides that let you link multiple Mad Rock pads (except for the R3) into one giant pad. If money is tight or you just want a more flexible pad configuration, this is a great way to go.
The Mad Pad's 5-inch thick foam is identical to that of the Duo and Triple Mad Pad with 3 inches of open cell foam between two 1-inch layers of harder closed cell foam. It softened up a bit over time but not as much as we initially expected. Because of how hard the foam is in a new pad, this aging makes the pad more versatile under shorter falls. We found the Mad Rock foam layup to last longer than that of most other pads.
This pad is best for all-around bouldering and also makes a nice addition for climbers building a quiver of pads. If you are on a tight budget, it's hard to beat the Mad Pad's low price and proven ability to cushion hard falls. It only has an average area and is best for use with a spotter who can move it under the climber.
The Mad Pad stands out because of how much foam you get for $175 and it was one of the least expensive pads that we reviewed. With few frills and impressively durable foam, this is a great option for climbers who are looking to save money without compromising functionality. Although you won't be able to carry tons of gear in it, the Mad Pad does a good job of performing its primary function of padding falls.
For those on a budget, the Mad Pad provides excellent functionality. It's a great pad for a variety of users because of its medium size, thick foam, and low cost. For climbers getting their first pad it's an affordable entry-level model, and for those supplementing a collection of pads, it will help to cover more ground under your project.
— Chris Summit, Chris McNamara, & Steven Tata