Hands-on Gear Review

Metolius Recon Review

A relatively thin and unimpressive pad that works well to supplement other pads.
Metolius Recon Crash Pad
By: Steven Tata ⋅ Senior Research Analyst  ⋅  Feb 2, 2018
Price:  $265 List  |  $264.95 at Backcountry
Pros:  Easy to transport, easy to carry, easily closed/opened, handy carpet square, well made, durable
Cons:  Does not carry very much gear (barely even the essentials), tri-fold hinge is often flip floppy or overly rigid on uneven landings
Manufacturer:   Metolius
62
OVERALL
SCORE


RANKED
#10 of 10
  • High Falls - 30% 7
  • Low Falls - 20% 7
  • Packing Gear - 20% 3
  • Features - 10% 7
  • Durability - 20% 7
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Our Verdict

The Metolius Recon is a medium-large crash pad that folds into three sections and is easy to carry, hence the name Recon. It was not one a favorite, as we prefer either a light and affordable pad that can hold a lot of gear, like the Metolius Session, or something more substantial like the Mad Rock Duo. The Recon gets lost in the middle. If you want to pack/haul more stuff with you and don't mind or prefer the smaller, compact size, then we recommend the Bailout. If you don't mind paying a bit more for quality foam and just a single hybrid hinge, then try the slightly larger Organic Full Pad.


Compare to Similar Products

Our Analysis and Test Results

Share:

Performance Comparison


Alex testing the Metolius Recon crash pad.
Alex testing the Metolius Recon crash pad.

Padding Falls


With 4" of foam, the Metolius Recon did not stand out for its cushioning abilities. Similar to the Mad Pad layering, but thinner, the Recon has 2.5" of open cell foam between stiffer closed cell foam layers that are 1" on top and 0.5" on the bottom. It was plenty thick enough to cushion medium and low falls but we preferred the thicker foam of Mad Rock's Mad Pad and Duo for high falls and rocky landings.

Chris Summit climbing over the Recon on "Miners Bane" V7 Labyrinth  Columbia CA.
Chris Summit climbing over the Recon on "Miners Bane" V7 Labyrinth, Columbia CA.

The Recon becomes very rigid when the Velcro hinge flaps are secured, but this is often as helpful as it is annoying. It is hard to lay flat on uneven terrain and with the flaps secured it can sometimes be too rigid — it slides out of place or sits unevenly. If you frequently climb over uneven or rocky landings, this pad is not the best choice. When the flaps are secured the rigidness also makes the pad work great as a back pad against a vertical surface or to flatten the landing over a crevice.

Packing Gear


The main drawback with the Recon's tri-fold design is that it holds very little gear. This pad barely fits the essentials (shoes, chalk bag, etc.) so if you like to pack a lot of gear then this is not the pad for you.

Features


When folded up for carrying the Recon resembles a suitcase and can be carried like one, making it a great secondary pad. A separate main pad can be used to carry the group's shoes and extra gear. The carpet square sewn onto the center of the pad works well for drying/cleaning shoes and makes a sort of bullseye to aim for when jumping/falling.

Durability


With multiple layers of foam and relatively thick body fabric, the Recon proved to be a durable pad. Its foam softened up gradually and seemed less sturdy than that of the Mad Pad or Black Diamond Mondo.

Best Applications


The Recon is best for bouldering in areas with flat landings and works especially well as a supplementary pad because of its ability to be carried like a suitcase. The tri-fold design is similar to that of the Mad Rock Triple Mad Pad, but with thinner foam. The Recon is one of the best secondary pads with its quick single-strap closure, compact design, and easy-to-transport shape.

Value


With a list price of $265 the Metolius Recon is about the same price as comparably sized pads, yet not as thick. The Mad Rock Triple Mad Pad is 1" thicker, 2" wider, and 10" longer with a list price of $259. If you're looking to maximize area per dollar the Triple Mad Pad provides a better value and is better for cushioning hard falls.

Conclusion


While it wasn't a favorite, the Recon worked well covering a large area for flat landings. We liked the Mad Rock Triple Mad Pad better as a standalone pad because of its larger area and thicker foam but would use the Recon as a second pad.

Steven Tata

You Might Also Like

OutdoorGearLab Member Reviews


Most recent review: February 2, 2018
Summary of All Ratings

OutdoorGearLab Editors' Rating:  
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 (3.0)
Average Customer Rating:  
 (0.0)
Rating Distribution
1 Total Ratings
5 star: 0%  (0)
4 star: 0%  (0)
3 star: 100%  (1)
2 star: 0%  (0)
1 star: 0%  (0)


Have you used this product?
Don't hold back. Share your viewpoint by posting a review with your thoughts...