Kelty Cosmic 20 Review
Compare prices at 2 resellers Pros: Inexpensive, burly, decent warmth, roomy fit
Cons: Heavier than average, bulky, no storage sack, no compression sack
Compare to Similar Products
Kelty Cosmic 20
|Price||$145.00 at Amazon|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$314.96 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$429.00 at Feathered Friends||$389.00 at Feathered Friends||$349.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 3 sellers
|Pros||Inexpensive, burly, decent warmth, roomy fit||Spacious dimensions, super comfortable, great loft, lightweight, made in the USA||Super lightweight, incredible loft, snag-proof zipper, cozy hood||Best-in-class zipper, best-in-class hood, awesome loft, great warmth-to-weight ratio||Spacious hourglass shape, innovative venting "gills", waterproof footbox, sturdy compression sack|
|Cons||Heavier than average, bulky, no storage sack, no compression sack||Expensive, awkward hood, good but not great zipper||Uncomfortably narrow dimensions, bare-bones design, noisy fabric||Narrow leg dimensions, no draft collar, heavier and bulkier than some 3-season options||Below average warmth-to-weight ratio, bulky packed size|
|Bottom Line||An affordable option that's still suitable for overnight backpacking||If we could only have one bag for the rest of our lives, this would be it||The ideal bag when you need the warmth, but ounces matter too||Exceptional warm and loft along with our favorite hood and zipper||An hourglass bag with premium down and spacious lower dimensions|
|Rating Categories||Kelty Cosmic 20||MegaLite||Hummingbird UL 30||Swallow 20 YF||NEMO Riff 30|
|Packed Size (15%)|
|Features & Design (10%)|
|Specs||Kelty Cosmic 20||MegaLite||Hummingbird UL 30||Swallow 20 YF||NEMO Riff 30|
|Insulation||600FP Down (83%) / Polyester (17%)||850+ FP Down||950+ FP Down||900+ FP Down||800 FP Down|
|Compressed Volume (L)||8.7 L||7.2 L||7.3 L||8.5 L||7.2 L|
|Measured Bag Weight (Size Long)||2.63 lbs||1.62 lbs||1.45 lbs||1.94 lbs||1.91 lbs|
|Compression/Stuff Sack Weight (oz)||0.8 oz||1.6 oz||0.8 oz||1.0 oz||2.4 oz|
|Manufacturer claimed weight of size Regular (lbs)||2.41 lbs||1.5 lbs||1.33 lbs||1.79 lbs||1.8 lbs|
|Manufacturer Temp Rating (F)||20 F||30 F||30 F||20 F||30 F|
|EN Temp Rating (Lower Limit, F)||19 F||Not rated||Not rated||Not rated||29 F|
|Fill Weight (oz)||18.2 oz||13 oz||12 oz||17.5 oz||10.2 oz|
|Compression or stuff sack included?||Stuff||Stuff||Stuff||Stuff||Compression|
|Shell material||Ripstop nylon (20D)||Extremelite (12D)||Pertex Endurance (10D)||Pertex YFuse (20D)||20D Nylon Ripstop w/ DWR|
|Small Organization Pocket||Yes||No||No||No||Yes|
|Zipper||3/4-length / Side||Full-length / Side||Full-length / Side||Full-length / Side||3/4-length / Side|
|Shoulder Girth (in)||64||64||58||60||62|
|Hip Girth (in)||60||Not stated||52||56||54|
|Foot Girth (in)||Not stated||39||38||38||59|
Our Analysis and Test Results
According to our research, the Cosmic 20 is one of the most popular 3-season sleeping bags. It's easy to understand why. It is one of the most inexpensive bags that's suitable for overnight backcountry travel. We know there are better bags out there, but the significantly higher prices just aren't worth it to everyone.
The Cosmic 20 is filled with a blend of 18.2 ounces of insulation: 600-FP down (83%) and polyester batting (17%). Although the down is distributed throughout the bag, the synthetic insulation is limited to the underside of the bag to resist long-term compression.
With this blend, this bag receives an EN lower limit temperature rating of 19°F. In our tests, however, this rating seemed a little generous. We suspect most users will be happier down to a 25-30° limit with a good sleeping pad. This bag also features a passive neck baffle to prevent heat from escaping out the hood opening. Without this, the Cosmic would likely have an even harder time living up to its 20° manufacturer rating.
A size long tipped our scale at 2.63 lbs. This isn't particularly light compared to some premium down bags, but it stands up well against comparably warm synthetics. The Cosmic's biggest advantage is its weight relative to its cost. For its list price, it's hard to find an equally warm and low weight competitor.
Although we've tested other bags priced similarly with advertised EN lower limit rating that are comparable, in our test the Cosmic felt considerably warmer than most other bargain bags.
This bags 50-denier nylon fabric lining is unlikely to win any awards for softness. Compared to the sub-20-denier linings found on many high-end down bags, it feels coarse and stiff. This fabric, however, is far more durable than its softer competitors.
In terms of the dimensions and fit, the Cosmic is pretty spacious. Its 64-inch shoulder girth leaves it among the widest bags we tried. Like all mummy bags, however, it tapers toward the feet. This can be an issue for side or tummy sleepers who might prefer an hour-glass shaped or zipperless design. The Cosmic, in contrast, feels most similar to other loose-fitting, budget, mummy bags
In a third-party compression sack, this bag packed down to 8.7 liters in volume. This leaves the Cosmic as one of the largest in our high-end sleeping bag review but one of the smallest in our separate budget bag review. Along with weight, packed size thus appears to be one of the biggest differences between affordable and expensive bags.
The extra two liters in volume compared to the most compact bags is unlikely to be a big issue for most potential users. Bargain shoppers, however, should be aware that at least seven additional liters separate the Cosmic from the bulkiest bargain bag. In this sense, 8.7 liters ain't bad.
An additional consideration for some will be that this bag only comes with a simple drawstring stuff sack that's ineffective at compressing it. To enjoy its reported minimum volume, you will need to buy a third-party compression sack that will cost you around twenty bucks. Unlike a lot of other bags, the Cosmic also doesn't come with a large storage sack for storing it when it's not in use.
In our tests, this bag's ¾-length zipper was effective at venting excess heat on warmer nights. This zipper, however, ends 18 inches from the end of the bag which hampers the possibility of using it as a quilt. The passive neck baffle and decent hood give you a couple of ways to seal heat in better in colder conditions.
Like all down bags, the Cosmic's down insulation loses its ability to insulate if it gets wet due to the feathers clumping together. The 17% of the insulation that's synthetic fiber is also unlikely to be much help because its all located on the underside of the bag. If you plan to use your sleeping bag for particularly wet activities or environments, there are several great synthetic options is in the same price range.
Features and Design
In the latest versions of this bag, Kelty has added a convenient stash pocket that's great for keeping a phone or headlamp close by. In addition, the fabric adjacent to the zipper is now a burlier nylon weave. This is helpful because it adds stiffness to the fabric to keep it out of the zipper's teeth and ensures that if the zipper does snag it's unlikely to tear.
The fabric covering the rest of the bag is also a higher denier than most ultra-premium bags. On the one hand, this is bad because it's heavier and coarser, but on the other its great because the added strength means you don't have to baby the bag as much.
While the Cosmic provides only average performance in several areas, its price is excellent. Listed below two hundred dollars, it is a great deal for a legit backpacking bag. Although it weighs a little more and doesn't pack as small as the top-performing bags, you can use the hundreds of dollars you save to cut weight and bulk from other pieces of your backcountry kit.
The prices of lots of backcountry gear can be pretty shocking. Charging $500+ for a simple bag made of nylon, feathers, and a zipper is sure to sound like highway robbery to many folks. For those, the Kelty Cosmic 20 serves as a reasonable compromise. Although it doesn't receive the highest scores in warmth, weight, or comfort, its performance is more than adequate for most backcountry applications. We believe the benefits of a high-end bag are worth the added cost to serious backpackers, but for everyone else, the Cosmic provides acceptable performance at a more reasonable price.
— Jack Cramer