Dynastar M-Tour 99 F-Team Open Review
Our Verdict
Compare to Similar Products
![]() This Product
Dynastar M-Tour 99 F-Team Open | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Awards | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
Price | $849.95 at Evo Compare at 3 sellers | $849.95 at Backcountry Compare at 2 sellers | $524.96 at Backcountry Compare at 3 sellers | $795 List $675.75 at Amazon | $1,150 List $804.96 at Backcountry |
Overall Score ![]() |
|||||
Star Rating | |||||
Pros | Optimized weight and performance | Stable, damp, versatile, floaty, balanced | All-around performance, damp, inexpensive, available, sweet-spot weight | Fast float, incredible weight (for the size), acceptable poor snow performance | Wicked light, serviceable firm snow performance |
Cons | Slightly poor firm snow performance | Moderately heavy, not optimal firm snow performance | Soft and damp | Abysmal, scary firm snow performance, specialized application | Must ski slow and very deliberately in most conditions |
Bottom Line | All-around, solid skis for all kinds of soft and poor-snow backcountry skiing | This is our favorite ski for modern, all-around backcountry skiing, bringing traditional reliability, modern dimensions, and performance balance | Inexpensive, proven all-around performance that's suitable for a wide variety of backcountry skiers and ski conditions | Among the most specialized skis in our test, it's optimized for the deepest of days in the deepest of regions | Specialized light touring skis for fast uphilling and careful downhilling |
Rating Categories | Dynastar M-Tour 99... | Blizzard Zero G 105 | K2 Wayback 106 | Voile HyperDrifter | Movement Race Pro 77 |
Weight (25%) | |||||
Firm Snow (20%) | |||||
Powder (20%) | |||||
Crud and Poor Snow (20%) | |||||
Stability at Speed (15%) | |||||
Specs | Dynastar M-Tour 99... | Blizzard Zero G 105 | K2 Wayback 106 | Voile HyperDrifter | Movement Race Pro 77 |
Weight Per Pair | 6.0 lbs | 6.7 lbs | 6.9 lbs | 7.0 lbs | 3.8 lbs |
Weight Per Ski | 1360g, 1371g average: 1366g |
1515g, 1510g average: 1513g |
1518g, 1557g average: 1537g |
1545g, 1585g average: 1565g |
856g, 866g average 861g |
Weight Per Pair | 2731g | 3025g | 3075g | 3130g | 1722g |
Weight Per Surface Area Ratio, g/cm^2 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.54 |
Measured Length | 177cm | 178cm | 179cm | 177cm | 167cm |
Manufacturer Length | 178cm | 180cm | 179cm | 178cm | 168cm |
Available Lengths (cm) | 162, 170, 178, 186 | 164, 172, 180, 188 | 172, 179, 186 | 171, 178, 186 | 152, 160, 168, 174 |
Claimed Dimensions (mm) | 127/99/117 | 133/105/118 | 136/106/124 | 155/121/138 | 115/77/96 |
Measured Dimensions (mm) | 127/98/116 | 133/104/118 | 135/107/123 | 154/121/138 | 114/76/94 |
Construction Type | Sandwich | Sandwich | Sandwich Cap Hybrid | Cap | Sandwich |
Core Material | Paulownia | Paulownia | Paulownia | Paulownia | Paulownia |
Waist Width | 98mm | 105mm | 107mm | 121mm | 77mm |
Radius | 20m | 23m | 22m | 19m | 19m |
Rocker/Camber | Tip and tail rocker, camber underfoot | Tip and tail rocker | Tip rocker, slight camber underfoot | Tip rocker, camber underfoot | Tip rocker, camber underfoot |
Our Analysis and Test Results
Dynastar's M-Tour 99 F Team is the latest iteration in a line of this French company's all-around, all-conditions ski touring stick. We greatly enjoyed its neutral performance across a wide range of conditions. It inspired such confidence that our lead test and accomplished expedition ski guide Jed Porter chose to use it on a standard-setting guided expedition on Denali during our test period. Much of what we report is based on his experience on that significant and serious trip.
Performance Comparison
Weight
The Dynastar M-Tour 99, as tested in size 178cm, weighs 1366 grams per ski. That's 2731 grams or 6 lbs for the pair. This "weight point" is what we have long concluded is the sweet spot for all-around, self-propelled backcountry skiing. Many of our favorite skis in the past 10 years have weighed between 1200 and 1400 grams.
You can go heavier and get slightly better downhill ski performance, but efficiency suffers on the way uphill. Any lighter than 1200-1300 grams, and the downhill ski performance suffers with every lost gram. It is no coincidence that our favorite tested skis are in this weight range. The Dynastar strikes a great balance. You could go lighter, but it wouldn't be worth it for most skiers.
Firm Snow
Our team found the Dynastar M-Tour 99 F Team to be "good enough" in hard, icy snow. In friendlier firm snow (corn conditions, for one), they are a dream. Where the snow got truly icy (like we found, for instance, high on Denali in historically dry and firm conditions), we clearly survived on the M Tour 99 but also found ourselves wishing for greater edge hold. It is hard to attribute edge hold to any particular design or materials attribute, but we got enough mileage to be confident in our conclusion. Other available products in this weight class will grab better on icy snow. Our test experience included descending directly from the Denali summit on the hardest of wind-blown snow and, lower down, skiing a few inches of snow over blue ice.
Powder
We skied a little bit of really deep snow and tons of shallower, fast-n-fresh stuff with the Dynastar M-Tour 99 F Team. In all our experiences with powder snow, the Dynastar 99 served us well. The light construction and relatively narrow profile (narrow, that is, for soft snow) doesn't blast powder like bigger products will, but the light form factor allows for greater energy savings on the way up for good to great performance on the way down in powder.
Crud/Poor Snow
The poor snow performance of this Dynastar M- Tour is especially good for the weight. The centered, dampened flex profile seems to help with predictable edging and flotation in breakable crust and sloppy "mashed potatoes". More mass would help even further, but at the expense of efficiency. Poor snow performance, more than any other attribute of a backcountry ski, is a balancing act. One of the greatest determinants of poor snow performance, in our experience, is weight. More weight works better in poor snow. If we were to graph our anecdotal experience with poor snow performance against ski weight, that line would start to plateau around 1200 grams.
Stability at Speed
Rail 'em as you like, within reason. The familiar Dynastar dampening factor (other tested skis from this company have skied relatively damp — that is, not especially springy) comes to the M-Tour 99 and grants continuity to any particular high-speed skiing. With this ski, the speed limit will likely (or, more accurately, should) come from the consequences of crashing in the backcountry more than ski comfort at that speed. Other skis might inspire even more confidence, but nothing about that ski or confidence changes the fact that crashing at 40mph in the wilderness is a bad idea.
Should You Buy the Dynastar M-Tour 99 F Team?
Yes, we recommend this ski. The breadth of potential applications of this product is significant. Most will have one pair of skis for human-powered skiing, and these Dynastars (or any of our Editors' Choice or Best Buy winners) are perfectly suited for this "quiver of one" approach. Even if you can justify more than one pair of backcountry skis, the Dynastar M-Tour fits in your quiver. This is the ski you choose for the Haute Route, for an Alaskan expedition, for a month in Chile, or that fantastical "work from home" season in Chamonix.
What Other Backcountry Skis Should You Consider?
In this same sub-category of backcountry skis, your choices are great. If the all-around high performance of the Dynastar M-Tour 99 is appealing, you will also do well with the Black Crows Camox, Blizzard Zero G 105, K2 Wayback 106, Fischer Hannibal 96, or DPS Pagoda Tour 100. This list could go on and on. All around backcountry skis right now are very, very good, almost entirely across the board. You get to shop by brand loyalty, price, availability, and color.
Ad-free. Influence-free. Powered by Testing.
GearLab is founded on the principle of honest, objective, reviews. Our experts test thousands of products each year using thoughtful test plans that bring out key performance differences between competing products. And, to assure complete independence, we buy all the products we test ourselves. No cherry-picked units sent by manufacturers. No sponsored content. No ads. Just real, honest, side-by-side testing and comparison.
Learn More