Hands-on Gear Review

RTIC 65 Review

Gets you most of the advantage of a high-end model for about 60% of the average high-end price.
By: Max Mutter and Steven Tata  ⋅  Feb 8, 2018
Price:  $240 List  |  $239.95 at Amazon
Pros:  Inexpensive (for a high-end model), good insulation, durable
Cons:  Slightly uncomfortable handles, messy drain plug
Manufacturer:   RTIC

#6 of 10
  • Insulation - 50% 8
  • Durability - 20% 7
  • Ease of Use - 15% 6
  • Portability - 10% 5
  • Features - 5% 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Best Buy Award

Our Verdict

Combining high-end performance with much less sticker shock than most high-end cooler brands, the RTIC 65 is a great compromise for those that want premium performance without the premium price. In fact, in a head-to-head insulation test, the $240 RTIC fell a mere few hours short of the performance of the $400 YETI Tundra 65. Unless you plan on regularly pushing your cooler to the absolute maximum when that last extra bit of insulation power will actually matter, the RTIC offers a more cost-effective way to enjoy the durability and ice-retention of a top quality, roto-molded cooler.

Compare to Similar Products

Our Analysis and Test Results


Performance Comparison

With great performance and a relatively low cost considering its construction, the RTIC 65 was a shoe-in for our Best Buy: High-End Cooler award. You can see how its overall performance stacked up against the other models we tested in the table above. Below, we'll expound upon its performance in all of the different tests we conducted.


The RTIC 65 earned a score of 8 out of 10 in our Insulation testing, a score shared with the vast majority of the other high-end coolers we tested.

To test the RTIC's insulation performance, we conducted a side-by-side test with the YETI Tundra 65, putting thirty pounds of ice in each to start. In the end, the RTIC was able to keep the temperature below 40˚F for 7.1 days. The YETI lasted a little longer, going for 7.3 days. This is a difference of about 4 hours and 45 minutes over the course of a week-long test.

We then adjusted the RTIC's insulation performance, using the YETI as a control metric, so that we could directly compare it to the rest of the coolers we tested. After a few calculations, we determined that the RTIC would have been maintained temperatures below 40˚F for about 5.5 days if it had been run in our original test. Compare this to the Editors' Choice-winning OtterBox, which lasted 6.5 days.

The Industry standard YETI vs. the budget high-end model made by RTIC.
The Industry standard YETI vs. the budget high-end model made by RTIC.

Bottom line, the RTIC is more than capable of keeping food cold on a long weekend camping trip. It also offers significantly more breathing room for those long weekend trips than budget options like the Coleman Xtreme, which held safe food temperatures for 3.7 days in our insulation testing.


With a score of 7 out of 10, the RTIC 65 sits right in the pack of high-end roto-molded models that we tested, all of which earned either a 7 or an 8 out of 10 in this metric.

The RTIC uses the same pin style hinges that most of the other high-end models do. The handles are sturdy ropes with a hard plastic tube that give a solid gripping surface. The drain plug has no leash, but is well designed. The one main reason it was demoted to a 7 rather than an 8 is because of its latches. The rubber latches work well and we think would stand up to years of abuse. However, they are a bit thinner than the latches on many of the other high-end models, and the rubber balls that actually hold the lid closed in particular are comparatively small. This means they would need less wear than other latches before they'd become non-functional. Unless you repeatedly drop your cooler off a cliff we don't think this will ever be an issue, but it is one area where the RTIC's build is less burly than that of other high-end coolers.

The RTIC's durable  pin style hinges.
The RTIC's durable, pin style hinges.

Ease of Use

The RTIC 65 earned a fairly average score of 6 out of 10 in our user friendliness testing. Essentially, it functions as one would expect a cooler to function, and doesn't add any special design touches that would make you think, "Hey, what a great idea!"

The RTIC latches engage and disengage about as easily as any of the rubber latches designs we tested. The only model that really sets itself apart in terms of latch design is the Pelican ProGear, which uses a push-button mechanism. This definitely easier than using the rubber latches of the RTIC, but not to a significant degree. Once opened, the lid generally stays open, but might snap shut on you if you bump against the cooler. The handles thoughtfully stop short of the drain plug, but the drain plug itself does tend to splash a bit when emptying. This was a problem we experienced with most of the models we tested, so again, not a dealbreaker whatsoever. We do wish that is had a drain leash, as the Pelican and Yukon do, because it's easier than you'd think to lose a drain plug.

The handle stops just short of the drain plug  which is perfect.
The handle stops just short of the drain plug, which is perfect.


The RTIC again earned an average score of 5 out of 10 in this metric. It is neither exceedingly portable nor particularly onerous to move around. It is about as portable as you'd expect a large cooler to be.

Weighing in at 36 pounds, the RTIC is slightly above average for a roto-molded cooler. Models like the YETI Tundra 65 and the Engel are slightly lighter at 29.7 and 26.1 pounds, respectively, but that extra few pounds probably won't be noticeable when you're lifting a fully loaded cooler. The handles, like those of the YETI, do feel a bit harsh on your hands but don't pinch like those of the ORCA and Grizzly. The recessed handles are deep enough to be fairly comfortable. The non-stick feet keep it from sliding around wilding in the back of your car, but also don't make it too difficult to slide around either. It can also fit in most national park bear boxes.

The handles are generally comfortable  but they may sting a bit when lifting a fully loaded cooler.
The handles are generally comfortable, but they may sting a bit when lifting a fully loaded cooler.


The RTIC does not have any particularly special features, but it does have a slot for a divider, and the rugged latches and pin style hinges found on all high-end models This earned it an average score of 5 out of 10 in this metric.


If you're looking for a cooler that can easily keep things cold for a full long weekend and that will stand the test of time, the RTIC 65 is a pretty great value. It performs nearly as well as most of the other roto-molded coolers we tested, which retail for an average of about $350. The RTIC, in comparison, lists for only $240. The RTIC also performed considerably better than budget models like the Coleman Xtreme, which can be found for as little as $40 but offers only about 60% of the insulation performance and is far less durable.

The one model that throws a spanner in the works is the ORCA 58 Quart, which recently saw a price reduction down to $300. The ORCA was one of the best performers in our insulation testing. However, we measured its actual capacity at 54 quarts, making it 11 quarts smaller than the RTIC. That said, if you're willing to spend $60 and don't mind the reduction in size, the ORCA may be a better bet.

All loaded up and ready to go.
All loaded up and ready to go.


The RTIC 65 offers almost all the advantages of those fancy $400 coolers you walk by in the store, but at a much more palatable price. For those looking for a very durable and effective cooler that doesn't require taking out a loan to buy, this is the best choice.

Max Mutter and Steven Tata

You Might Also Like

OutdoorGearLab Member Reviews

Most recent review: May 2, 2018
Summary of All Ratings

OutdoorGearLab Editors' Rating:  
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Average Customer Rating:  
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

100% of 1 reviewers recommend it
Rating Distribution
2 Total Ratings
5 star: 100%  (2)
4 star: 0%  (0)
3 star: 0%  (0)
2 star: 0%  (0)
1 star: 0%  (0)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
   May 2, 2018 - 12:55pm
benpurcell · Fisherman · Santa Fe, NM

I bought this cooler in the 45 quart size after comparing to the Yeti 45 for a while. Here are the points I was considering that helped me make up my mind:

1) The Yetis come with a great warranty and are rated as bearproof. For backcountry guides or hunters who operate out of a base camp, I could see this being absolutely invaluable, and well worth the premium price since you'll likely replace the cooler at least once in your lifetime. For me, this was a non-issue since I don't live in grizzly country and I don't expect to drop my cooler off of any cliffs.

2) The Rtics go on sale frequently. I was able to pick mine up for $150 with free shipping to my door. That means that for the same price as a Yeti Tundra 45, I could buy two of the Rtics and still have enough left over to fill one up with ice for the weekend. This also helped reduce the drawing power of the Yeti warranty, since I'd need to replace my cooler twice before that warranty really started to be worth the up-front cost, and I don't think that'll happen.

3) The Yeti Tundra 45 does not hold the same volume as the Rtic 45. The Rtic holds 45 quarts, which is pretty sensible given the name. The Yeti Tundra 45 only holds 38 quarts on the other hand. As far as I can tell, the 45 is meaningless since no unit of measurement makes sense there (not quarts, liters, pounds of ice, cans of beer), but whatever, right? The closest cooler Yeti has in volume to the Rtic 45 is their Tundra 50, which holds 47 quarts and has a price tag of $380!!!!

For that much you can get two Rtic 45's and:
  • fill them BOTH with ice and beer for a weekend, or,
  • fill one of them with steak for a group cookout, or,
  • fill one of them with ice and grab gas for a trip, or,
  • buy Yeti's ridiculous $40 5-gallon bucket ($70 if you want the lid too!)

The third point is what really sold me on the Rtics. The discrepancy between Yeti's numbering system and their actual capacities seems a little dishonest, since volume plays a role in ice retention. For example:
Yeti 65 - 57 quarts

Rtic 65 - 65 quarts

The Rtic has 13% more interior volume, but the test done on outdoorgearlab here loaded each cooler with an identical amount of ice. This puts the Rtic at a disadvantage when directly comparing temperature thresholds, since the Rtic then has an additional bit of empty space. For a truly proportional test, you'd throw an extra 4lbs of ice (13% of 30lbs) into the Rtic, and I'd anticipate seeing a roughly proportional extension of it's ice retention time, pushing it to 7.8 days up from the original 7.1 days. Even if the performance gain isn't a perfect 13%, I'd expect it to break even with the Yeti's 7.3 days at least, which is pretty great considering that you can get that performance for a couple hundred bucks less in the long run. That's a big win in my book.

Bottom Line: Yes, I would recommend this product to a friend.

Have you used this product?
Don't hold back. Share your viewpoint by posting a review with your thoughts...