The world's most in-depth and scientific reviews of outdoor gear

How We Tested Ski Pants

By Jediah Porter ⋅ Review Editor
Wednesday January 9, 2019
Changing pants on the peak for immediate comparison.
Changing pants on the peak for immediate comparison.

For this review, we skied a ton. It's rough, but someone's gotta do it. Each pair of pants was worn at Grand Targhee and Jackson Hole in Wyoming's Tetons. Targhee is high and exposed. Storms are intense and foggy. We also tested at California's Mammoth Mountain. Mammoth complements Targhee in that some days are warmer, and its storms are intense and wet. Sunny days are more frequent on Mammoth, and the terrain is bigger and rowdier. These are excellent outerwear testing conditions. The only condition we couldn't replicate here was rain, so to test the waterproofness, we wore each pair of pants in the shower. This proved to be a valuable examination, showing weakness more than on an average ski day.

Our lead test editor is a backcountry ski guide. He wore each pair of pants on at least one short backcountry tour, if not multiple longer tours. With more and more skiers heading out of bounds, this testing helps keep our recommendations current. We loaned the pants to other skiers for both in-bounds use and backcountry testing. Each pair of pants was evaluated and scored across each performance metric.

Testing for waterproofness. Rub-a dub dub.
Testing for waterproofness. Rub-a dub dub.