SportRack Vista XL Review
Cons: Awkward rear opening, flimsy lid
Compare to Similar Products
SportRack Vista XL
|Price||$340 List||$780 List||$559 List||$630 List||$459.99 at Amazon|
|Pros||Simple design, lots of room, inexpensive||Easiest to install, ergonomic handle, sleek design||Great handle, cool appearance, less expensive||Simple installation, sleek matte finish, great shape for skis||Relatively inexpensive, easy to attach, convenient to use|
|Cons||Awkward rear opening, flimsy lid||Pricey||Frustrating installation||Clunky shape, inconvenient handle||Won’t fit longer skis, longer crossbar spans can be problematic for install|
|Bottom Line||For a great price, the SportRack offers a functional design for the budget adventurer||This box is a stand-out product that scored high marks in every category||With an excellent user-friendliness score, the SkyBox is a great value for a mid-ranged cargo box||With plenty of space and a user-friendly design, the Force XT XL is a great cargo box for a variety of users||If you are trying to maximize bang for the buck and aren’t typically transporting longer skis and gear, we highly recommend this rooftop cargo carrier|
|Rating Categories||SportRack Vista XL||Thule Motion XT XL||Yakima Skybox 16 Carbonite||Thule Force XT XL||Goplus Rooftop Carrier|
|Ease Of Use (40%)|
|Specs||SportRack Vista XL||Thule Motion XT XL||Yakima Skybox 16...||Thule Force XT XL||Goplus Rooftop...|
|Weight (lbs)||28 lb||42 lb||47 lb||47 lb||25 lb|
|Volume (Cubic Feet)||18 cu ft||18 cu ft||16 cu ft||18 cu ft||14 cu ft|
|Size (Inches - L x W x H)||63" x 38" x 19"||84.5" x 36" x 17"||81" x 36" x 15"||84.5" x 36" x 17"||63" x 31" x 15"|
|Additional Sizes||n/a||L (16) and XXL (22)||Lo, 12, 18, and 21||Sport (11), L (16), and XXL (22)||n/a|
|Maximum Ski Length||n/a||200 cm||185cm||200 cm||140 cm|
Our Analysis and Test Results
While we may not recommend this box to our adventurous friends looking for long-term gear storage for their every weekend trip, we might recommend this to our parents who are looking for a little extra room for their occasional vacation. Its simplicity could be frustrating if used daily, but if you're on a tight budget or don't plan on using your cargo box all the time, we think the SportRack is a great choice, especially when compared to similar boxes in its price range.
Ease of Use
We have to admit, this category is a little subjective. For this metric, we picked the three most important criteria: assembly, installation, and opening/closing. The SportRack scored major points because it came fully assembled, had a relatively straightforward installation, and included a user-friendly lock and handle.
The SportRack comes ready to mount right out of the box, saving us loads of time and energy. This box uses a U-bolt mounting system similar and is impressively easy to understand and install. While it did take a bit longer to do than the more advanced mounting systems of the expensive Yakima and Thule boxes, the installation of this box was pretty painless. We wouldn't necessarily want to have to take it on and off every day, but this is one area we'd be happy to save money in if we didn't plan on using this box all that often.
Every other box in this review opens from the side except for the SportRack Vista XL, which opens from the read. We have mixed feelings about this. When we first mounted this box on our lead tester's van, it was impossible to reach everything inside. The box is much wider than any other in our review, and whether from the side or the back, we couldn't reach the back corner. Frustrating. We then put the box on another tester's Element and had the same problem. Finally, we mounted it on our photographer's Subaru Forester, and we could actually use it. While we didn't mind the rear opening, in this case, we definitely would have scored this box higher if it had the standard side opening which we think is more universally friendly. We talked to a friend who loves rear-opening boxes for loading snowboards, and at 63 inches long (or 160 cm), you may be able to load your snowboard in this box (though most skis are out of the picture). The rear opening seems to be a point of personal preference, but we are hesitant about recommending this box to drivers of big cars.
Though lacking the sturdy, ergonomic handle of the top-tier products, the Vista XL is surprisingly easy to open and close. The lid overlaps the bottom of the box enough to form a pretty effective grip, and we never had trouble latching it correctly. We had no complaints about the key lock's straightforward and smooth design. The lid is pretty floppy and the Vista XL doesn't match the user-friendliness of more expensive boxes but this simplicity can be a gift.
We subjected our boxes to time, miles, and the elements to get an idea of their potential longevity. We're slightly concerned by the SportRack's seemingly flimsy building materials, but it showed no signs of distress after our rounds of testing, and we docked it points mostly for its flimsy lid. We were pleasantly surprised that none of the boxes in this test had any measurable impact on our gas mileage.
Compared to the seamless design of other models, we would be cautious about putting our electronics in the Vista XL unprotected. For the U-bolt system to be universal, there are multiple sets of holes to choose from depending on your crossbar width. Because of this, you're left with holes in the bottom of the box. SportRack's solution is to provide some vinyl stickers to cover the holes. While this helps, they are pretty easy to pull off. The Vista XL should keep your things dry in a normal rainstorm — these holes are tiny, mind you — but we would definitely put our moisture-sensitive belongings in a drybag before going in the box. Despite the box's flimsiness, the wind didn't seem to affect it, and we never heard any rocking or whistling no matter how fast we were driving.
The SportRack lost the majority of its durability points because of its floppy lid. This is one area where you can see the price difference vis-a-vis the more expensive models in this review. The plastic is much thinner than any other box we tested. The lid is extremely flimsy and is prone to opening fully on one side and only halfway on the other. This wasn't too annoying, as we just had to give the less opened side a little boost before it shot right up, but it paled in comparison to the top scorers in this category.
The majority of the boxes all felt secure enough to trust with our previous gear, we expanded this category to include all aspects of the security mechanisms. The locking system of the SportRack is simple but effective, so we gave it a 5/10 for its overwhelming mediocrity.
Despite lacking in special features, we felt pretty confident that the SportRack would keep our belongings safe from crooks. The only thing that might hinder this is the flimsy materials, but we still think a thief would need quite the tool to break in. The U-bolts are small but strong, and we think it would be next to impossible to rip this box off the car. That being said, while we felt comfortable leaving our things in the SportRack, it should be noted that the manufacturer explicitly warns that the locks are meant to deter theft, not prevent it, and we agree that it seems much easier to break into the smaller lock of the SportRack than those of the more expensive boxes we tested.
Like almost all the boxes in this review except for the Sidekick, it is impossible to lock the key in the box because the lid must be latched to remove it. (As someone who locks her keys in her car all the time, that is a must-have feature for our lead tester.) We don't like that the box has no special features for making it easy to see if the lid is latched or not. On the other hand, we never had trouble getting the lock to line up and latch properly, even with the flimsiest lid we saw, which impressed us.
We know what you're thinking: are any of these cargo boxes all that attractive? While we can't speak for everyone, we did have clear preferences, and as people who obviously care about style (did you see our lead tester's van?), we couldn't help but give the appearance a small percentage of the overall score. We looked at color, finish, and shape, and found that the SportRack is, well, pretty average.
It is wider than any other model we tested (though only by a few inches) but significantly shorter (63 inches compared to the 80-inch minimum of our "long and leans"), giving it a stumpy appearance. We didn't hate it, but it did look much more normal on one tester's small Subaru Forester than another's bigger Honda Element. Its look is different but not exactly eye-catching.
Average is the name of the game for the SportRack, and its black finish is no different. The matte finish isn't the most visually appealing around but it does do a better job at hiding scratches than the glossy finishes of other boxes.
We generally think you get what you pay for with cargo boxes. While much less fancy than the boxes at the top of our charts, we think an occasional user would find value in this box at a fraction of the cost of higher-end boxes.
While we were annoyed by its rear opening, the Vista XL is an alright option if you need a simple solution to get your gear around without spending a ton of cash.
— Lauren DeLaunay