Salomon MTN Explore 95 Review
Cons: Ski “short”, powder skiing stability suffers at super high speed
Compare to Similar Products
Salomon MTN Explore 95
|Price||$700 List||$699.95 at Backcountry||Check Price at REI|
Compare at 3 sellers
|$948.95 at Backcountry||$649.95 at Amazon|
|Pros||Inexpensive, balanced downhill performance, average weight||All-around performance, damp, inexpensive, available, sweet spot weight||Stable, damp, predictable||Stable, predictable downhill performance in all snow types and terrain||Solid all around downhill performance, compatible with excellent Dynafit SpeedSkins|
|Cons||Ski “short”, powder skiing stability suffers at super high speed||Soft and damp||Mid-weight, no real stand out performance||Heavy||Heavier than average|
|Bottom Line||Great, budget skis for backcountry skiers of all kinds; the all around, balanced performance appeals to a huge range of users||Inexpensive, proven all-around performance that's suitable for a wide variety of backcountry skiers and ski conditions||Good skis for good skiers in all kinds of conditions; the definition of all around backcountry skis||A nouveau classic touring ski in a time when the market is moving lighter for the same downhill performance||Touring skis for he or she that prefers downhill performance to uphill efficiency|
|Rating Categories||Salomon MTN Explore 95||K2 Wayback 106||Black Crows Camox F...||Kastle TX 103||Dynafit Beast 98|
|Firm Snow (20%)|
|Crud And Poor Snow (20%)|
|Stability At Speed (15%)|
|Specs||Salomon MTN Explore 95||K2 Wayback 106||Black Crows Camox F...||Kastle TX 103||Dynafit Beast 98|
|Weight Per Pair||6.8 lbs||6.9 lbs||6.7 lbs||7.6 lbs||6.8 lbs|
|Weight Per Ski||1547g, 1529g, average:1538g||1518g, 1557g, average: 1537g||1510g, 1509g, average: 1510g||1727g, 1708g, average: 1718g||1541g, 1553g, average: 1547g|
|Weight Per Pair||3076g||3075g||3024g||3435g||3094g|
|Weight Per Surface Area Ratio, g/cm^2||0.76||0.71||0.71||0.79||0.75|
|Available Lengths||169, 177, 184cm||172, 179, 186cm||162, 172, 178, 183cm||165, 173, 181, 189cm||170, 177, 184cm|
|Construction Type||Half-cap||Sandwich Cap Hybrid||Semi-cap||Sandwich||Sandwich|
|Core Material||3D Full Woodcore, C/FX reinforcement||Paulownia||Paulownia, poplar||Paulownia, poplar||Ash/poplar wood|
|Rocker/Camber||Rocker, camber, rocker||Tip rocker, slight camber underfoot||Tip rocker, camber underfoot||Tip rocker, camber underfoot||Double Ellipse Rocker|
Our Analysis and Test Results
The Salomon Mtn Explore 95 was a contender for our Editors' Choice Award. It was a very close contender. It wasn't decided until, in the final week of initial testing, we handed it off to our final tester for head to head comparison with another top performer. That tester broke a durable tie and chose the other product. However, we then realized just how much less expensive the Salomon is than the other top scorers. For the cost, the MTN Explore 95 is among the best skis in our review.
At 1538 grams, the MTN Explore 95 is about average for a touring ski. We start to get bogged down, literally, beyond 1600 grams for a pair of touring skis. We really like skinning with carefully built skis that weigh closer to 1400 grams. Our experience suggests that it is easy to make 1700g skis go downhill real well, a challenge around 15-1600, and virtually impossible below 1400.
In this price range, we don't expect an all-around backcountry ski to weigh less than 1500 grams. Salomon meets these expectations. It is how well they ski that really surprises us. Given the weight and cost matrix, we are very pleasantly surprised by the versatility and performance of the Salomon.
Stability at Speed
We were able to ski in the backcountry with resort-level speeds on the MTN Explore 95. Whether low angle and huge radius turns, or snappier steep turns, the Salomon did nothing unexpected. Heavier and/or more sophisticated skis perform even better, but nothing in this price or weight range comes close.
In assessing stability, we ski both open and fast and in the steeps. Steeper skiing bring out different things than high speed low angle terrain. In both venues, though, the Salomon was predictable and stable. Like anything, bigger boots helped. We also skied these with super light skimo style boots and found them to be reliable and predictable. We tested a relatively short pair of MTN Explore 95. For our test team. it wouldn't have been wrong to size up from 177cm to 184cm. With that step up, we anticipate even greater high speed stability. That we were able to find such stability in relatively short skis only enhances our faith in our own conclusions.
Testing firm snow in the Tetons in early season isn't an easy task. But we did it. We sought it out. We took the challenge and made opportunities to get the Salomon out in icy and scratchy conditions. We found the edge grip to be even and secure. They don't grab as well as some stiffer and narrower options, but we had all the confidence we need for routine steep and firm.
The biggest differentiator in firm snow performance is the evenness of edge grip. Some skis seem to grab more tenaciously in the tip or in the tail. Other reviewers will attribute this to some construction attribute or another, but we've found that strategy to be fraught. Just when we claim that, say, the sidecut of ski XYZ is to blame for this or that issue we observed, we find that ski ABC has the same sidecut but no semblance of that same issue. Ski construction is complicated and interconnected. You don't know how something is going to perform until you test it.
You don't know what is really making a ski perform the way it is until you dissassemble it, pry into the designer's mind, and then run all that information through a super computer. And that's impossible. What we can do, though, is test these skis thoroughly. When it comes to edge grip, we put in the miles to conclude that the MTN Explore is smooth, centered, and even.
They pop, they carve, and they slash. Even "undersized" a little bit, we skied the deepest of days with the MTN Explore and had a blast. One testing day, our lead test editor lugged this Salomon for 8000 feet of face shot perfection. He got home to social media and found others complaining of upside-down, slow, and heavy powder skiing. Was he wrong, or are these skis just that good?
These are great skis. They aren't perfect. We found ourselves experiencing a bit of a powder skiing "speed limit". We are curious to someday try the next longer size. Multiple testers on our team found themselves wishing for a little more length.
Bad snow is never as fun as excellent snow. But backcountry skiing often involves "bad" snow. Breakable crust, deep slop, and tracked up conditions are going to happen. A good skier, on any gear, can revert to survival skiing tactics when the going gets tough. We've side-slipped entire mountains in tough conditions.
However, good skis can extend, into the spectrum of poor snow conditions, your "normal" linked and carved turns. If the best skis will push those linked turns into 85% of deteriorating snow conditions, and the worst skis can barely handle the first 15%, the MTN Explore 95 will make linked turns to about the 60% level. For the weight and the cost, this is more than acceptable.
These skis, as we went on and on about above, go downhill real well. The weight is average and acceptable. Their cost is significantly below average, especially given their lofty performance. The catch with the cost of backcountry skis is that the budget and average skis aren't that far apart. There are outliers on the high end, but the less expensive 80% of the market are all priced within about a hundred dollars of each other. These are great skis at a reasonable MSRP. Find them on sale and you really get a bargain. However, you might very well find other excellent skis at sale prices below these.
A good deal, and great performance. You are going to dig the MTN Explore 95 and save some pennies for more breakfast burritos on big days.
— Jediah Porter