Fischer Hannibal Review

The Hannibal does not excel in any one category. We find this again and again in our OutdoorGearLab reviews. Our award winners, recognized to be the best of the best, can excel in one very important way and then ride out through the remaining categories with medium-to-high scores. We develop our scoring matrix based on how the given equipment will be used. We divide the performance into a suite of scoring metrics, and then weight those metrics for their relative value. For backcountry skis then, we evaluate uphill performance basically by assessing weight. We evaluate downhill performance in terms of stability, firm snow performance, powder performance, and poor snow performance. If we were to assess the skis on only their downhill performance, the Fischer would come out near the middle. When we consider its ultralight construction for uphill efficiency, however, we find that the Hannibal leaps to the top of the field. That upper middle-of-the-road downhill performance is well worth the compromise because the ski is just so light for touring. All that, at a reasonable price, earned it our Best Buy award.

Performance Comparison

In overall scoring, the Fischer comes out in the upper portions. It skis better than many more expensive skis, and is lighter than most of the best downhill performers. Only the Editors Choice Volkl VTA 98 better optimizes uphill and downhill performance but at a higher price.

Weight

These are the third lightest skis in our test, and one of the narrowest. The North American ski market, in recent history, has emphasized mass and width. This has trickled into backcountry skis, resulting in a selection of products that is generally wider and heavier than we deem necessary. At OutdoorGearLab we are thankful to see narrower and lighter skis making a comeback of sorts. This Fischer Hannibal is a classic all-conditions touring ski with contemporary materials and a nod to modern dimensions. Fischer gets the skis so lightweight by keeping them narrow and thin, somewhat compromising durability and ski performance. They integrate just enough carbon fiber to stiffen the ride and bring proper alpine ski technology and experience to the overall package.


Backcountry skiing is becoming big business. Historically, alpine ski manufacturers made backcountry skis that skied well but were heavy, while the touring brands made skis that were light but didn't descend well. This Fischer model marks a departure from that norm, joining truly innovative lightweight construction with downhill pedigree. We'll say it again, the weight of the Hannibal 96 is perfect. Prognosticators are regularly proven wrong, but we are willing to bet that all-around backcountry skis will not get much lighter than this for years and years to come. The absolute lightest skis in our test, the La Sportiva Vapor Nano, are definitely lighter, but performance drops off fast beneath the weight of the Hannibal. Specialized skis, not reviewed here, take the weight loss to even further extremes. At those extreme low weights, ski performance diminishes even more dramatically. For uphill performance, of course, lighter skis excel. For most backcountry skiers in most conditions and for most objectives, the Hannibal and its like strike the perfect weight balance. The Hannibal is about the same weight as the Editors Choice Volkl VTA 98. Heavier skis, like the K2 Coomback 104 and the Top Pick Dynafit Chugach definitely ski with more confidence, but are much harder to lug up the mountain.

Stability at Speed

The feel at speed and in steep, high-energy riding with the Hannibal belies its ultralight construction. We do not know how Fischer did it, but the Hannibal allows for high-speed cruising and lands big jump turns almost as well as the much burlier products. One ski tester said about the Hannibal, without really considering the weight, "they just feel like an average alpine ski". This is high praise for an ultralight special purpose product.


At the same weight and similar dimensions, the Editors Choice Volkl VTA 98 brings noticeably better stability than the Hannibal. Similarly, the close competitor Dynastar Mythic is a little damper and forgiving than the Fischer. The Fischer, though, significantly exceeds the stability of the Top Pick DPS Wailer 99 Tour1.

Firm Snow Performance

While the lack of material in the Fischer cannot possibly be as stiff as something like the heavier Scott SuperGuide 95, the narrow profile provides more than adequate edge grip. In steep, rock-hard San Juan spring ski touring, the Hannibal hung on when it mattered the most. We also did some resort riding as part of a side-country avalanche course at Vail Mountain and found that the Fischer could rail groomed run turns as if it were not a 6-pound touring machine.


As compared to the other ultralight skis, the hand/bench flex tests we did make them all seem similar. If one were to casually flex both the Hannibal and the Vapor Nano, both would seem stiff enough for firm snow grip. It sure seems, however, that the almost 1 cm difference in width gives the hard snow edge to the Hannibal. We definitely found that the Hannibal performed better on the hard stuff.

Powder Performance

All skis we used were fun in powder. Our test roster varied in waist width by 21 mm. And we have used even bigger and even smaller skis in perfect powder snow. The widespread opinion holds that wider is better for powder. True, one can go faster on wide skis in powder. And one can make turns on lower angled slopes with wider skis. But when it is truly excellent, all modern skis are amazing in powder snow. If the powder is perfect, we would rather be able to bust out extra laps with lightweight, narrow skis, than be worn out by lugging the big guns up those same fluffy slopes.


In short, the Hannibal is great in powder snow. But all skis are great. The DPS Wailer 99 is our Top Pick for powder snow, mainly because it is so light that you can ski more on any given day. The Hannibal prefers shorter turns than the Volkl VTA 98. The Hannibal's soft tip floats up higher than that of the Dynastar Mythic. The big gun Dynafit Chugach crushes powder snow more than it surfs it. Relative to the Chugach, the Fischer is a precision finishing tool while the Chugach is a framing hammer.

Crud/Poor Snow Performance

In poor snow, width and construction matter the most. Bigger, more rockered skis ride better when the going gets breakable or sloppy. To make a narrow ski perform adequately in the tough stuff is a more difficult task. We will not sugar coat it. The Hannibal did not perform as well in the chop as the Volkl or K2 Coomback 104. What the Hannibal did, though, was get us through the inevitable bad snow with style. More than with most of the skis we reviewed, we were able to ski through poor snow with low-energy parallel turns. The edges grabbed minimally, the tips stayed up and out of the crust, and the tails followed where we intended to go. We cannot say that these charge the poor snow like a bigger tool would, but we can say that they do better than mere survival.

Best Applications

These are excellent, all-around skis for dedicated backcountry ski touring. Beginner to expert, mellow to steep, the Hannibal will serve a wide range of users and settings, as long as human is the power source and backcountry pace is the name of the game. We cannot recommend them for daily resort drivers or for super hard charging BC riders. We found the downhill ski performance of the Hannibal to be almost perfectly uniform across the board. Only the heavier skis performed as well or better in every category of downhill performance.

Value

Not far above the least expensive ski in our review but scoring among the best overall, these are an outstanding deal. They are slightly more difficult to find than skis from American companies. The high overall scoring at a reasonable price earned them our Best Buy award.

Value is also a matter of durability. Skis that last longer are less expensive to ride, per day out. We had no problems with the durability of the Hannibal 96. In our skiing this season, mainly typical backcountry touring in the American and Canadian mountain west, we rode generally easy and climbed all that we skied down. Had our testing been more resort based, we may have risked breaking the lightweight Hannibal. Had more of our testing been in super thin conditions like faced in recent years in California and in many seasons in the Northeast, the thin bases and edges may have suffered some damage. As it was, we did ski some in drought California and suffered no damage. We did log a total of about 20,000 vertical feet of varied backcountry terrain on the Fischer tester skis for 2018 with no damage. These aren't made for durability, but as compared to their lightweight peers, we have no reservations.

Conclusion

For all of our testers, the low weight of the Hannibal was their first impression. And, arguably, it is the Hannibal's most salient characteristic. For those for whom weight isn't a huge deal, the Hannibal's moderate (but very uniform) ski performance is a little underwhelming. One tester, after an initial test ride, was thoroughly unimpressed by the Hannibal. This tester rides heavy skis and doesn't mind the weight. Every other person to use the Hannibal liked its whole package of weight-to-performance ratio. Our lead test editor describes it as a ski to replace a quiver of three. It's a light mountaineering ski, good for day-to-day ski tour guiding, and the perfect ski to travel with. In the past, this lead editor would have constructed a quiver of three products to do what the Hannibal does on its own.