Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0 Review
Compare prices at 2 resellers Pros: Surprisingly durable for how light they are, killer price, lighter than most
Cons: No brake option, heel risers are more of a pain to learn
Compare to Similar Products
Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0
|Price||$279.96 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$450 List||$384.96 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$429 List||$445 List|
|Pros||Surprisingly durable for how light they are, killer price, lighter than most||Light, innovative downhill performance||Light, solid, adjustable, three heel lifts, good brakes||Solid, reliable ski bindings, excellent toe piece entry and easy heel lifter transitions||Light, simple|
|Cons||No brake option, heel risers are more of a pain to learn||Unsophisticated heel lifters, untested aftermarket brake||No certification, limited release adjustment||No ski brake option, heavier than bindings with the same or more features||Limited release functionality, no brakes, only one heel elevation|
|Bottom Line||A simple binding design that has been proven over decades now, available for a fraction of the price of others||These are excellent all around functioning bindings made for human powered skiing||This minimalist binding has exactly what most of you should want, and nothing you don’t need||These Canadian bindings use a now-proven overall design and include the latest of the greatest usability benefits; we only wish they were lighter||Superlight bindings for light to medium duty backcountry skiing; choose these for simplicity and their all-metal construction|
|Rating Categories||Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0||Marker Alpinist 12||Atomic Backland Tour||G3 Ion LT 12||Plum R170|
|Touring Performance (30%)|
|Downhill Performance (25%)|
|Ease of Use (15%)|
|Specs||Dynafit Speed Turn 2.0||Marker Alpinist 12||Atomic Backland Tour||G3 Ion LT 12||Plum R170|
|Weight (pounds for pair)||1.63 lbs||1.18 lbs||1.26 lbs||2.13 lbs||0.88 lbs|
|Weight of one binding, grams||370g||268g||286g||483g||199g|
|Release value range||4 to 10||6 to 12||"Men", "Women", "Expert"||5 to 12||8 Fixed|
|Stack height (mm. average of toe and heel pin height)||38mm||36mm||37mm||46mm||34mm|
|Toe/heel delta (mm difference in height between heel pins and toe pins)||17mm||3mm||10mm||12.5mm||4mm|
|Brake options||No brakes||90, 105, 115mm||80, 90, 100, 110, 120mm||No brakes||No brakes|
|Ski Crampon compatible?||Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D style.||Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D style.||Yes. "Standard" Dynafit/ B&D style.||With aftermarket part. Only G3 brand.||With aftermarket part. Best with Plum brand. "Standard" Dynafit/B&D style ski crampons can be lightly filed to work.|
Our Analysis and Test Results
This binding, in terms of overall form, hasn't changed in 20 years. We like that. Our testers and others have literally many times more experience with the function and durability of this design than with anything else available. Improvements to the overall tech binding design have come along. Some have stuck, but others have faded away. Of those attributes that other binding designs have improved on, only lighter weight, ski brakes (in some circumstances), and flip-flop style heel lifters improve on what the Speed Turn offers.
Other things the Speed Turn doesn't have, like DIN/ISO certification, "forward pressure", and release elasticity are, for most people and situations, "solutions without problems". What has worked for a long time will likely work for you. There are some attributes and features, now, in the Speed Turn that are less than ideal. However, the bargain price easily justifies some compromise.
This competitor features the same efficient pivot point that all of the other tech-style bindings share. The lighter weight makes touring uphill on these bindings noticeably easier, with their only real pitfall for touring-based adventures being their marginally more challenging to engage heel risers. The risers engage not by flipping forward (which is now more common), but instead, the user rotates the entire heel piece. Otherwise, the pivot freely turns, and there is as much range of motion in touring as you will need
Get the heel riser transitions down (and it is possible to learn to do it well enough with your ski pole that it feels easier than the flip-style transitions of other bindings. Our lead test editor, who has used Dynafit Speed Turn bindings for 15 years, prefers these transitions to flip-style. Yes, he has used and practiced extensively with the flip style…), and the Speed Turn has a touring performance that exceeds that of most of the field. The toe piece allows all the pivot range of motion you would ever need.
This binding model features good, but not fantastic downhill performance. It isn't ideal for resort-oriented skiing. These bindings are optimized for use by expert backcountry skiers (expert backcountry skiers match their downhill ski energy to conditions, risk allowances, and the equipment they are using) in all conditions. The downhill performance is good enough, provided you address the limitations of the release function and the lack of ski brakes.
Ski brakes are a downhill performance attribute. Years ago, Dynafit made a ski brake for use with a version of this binding, but it was problematic and not worth the weight. Currently, there is no brake option with the Speed Turn. Proceed accordingly, and realize that many very accomplished backcountry skiers do not use ski brakes. This requires planning and care but saves weight and fiddle factor. In terms of other downhill performance attributes (release function and boot retention security), the newer, more expensive, and much heavier "hybrid" (tech toe, alpine heel) bindings vastly exceed the downhill performance of the Dynafit Speed Turn.
Ease of Use
The Speed Turn 2.0 is a sweet binding that is very functional but is not quite as easy to use as most other tech bindings. Its heel riser, similar to older generations of Dynafit models, requires the user to rotate the heel piece to engage either height heel riser. This can be done via a ski pole without bending over but requires more practice than most other bindings in our review. When equally practiced to high levels, switching the heel risers of the Dynafit Speed Turn is actually easier than with the flip-style change of newer designs. The most common heel riser changes are (or at least should be) between the lowest and middle risers. Making these changes on the Dynafit Speed Turn requires precise pole moves, but these pole moves require less "precision" than the flips of the more common style on the market now. In other words, there is a longer learning curve with the Speed Turn than with the flip-style risers, but the result is a faster, easier transition.
For those who want to switch out their boots from time to time, this model offers a little less adjustment range than most other bindings we reviewed. Of course, it includes far more adjustment range than the non-adjustable bindings.
One Speed Turn binding weighs 370g. Again, it has weighed basically this same amount for years and years. A decade ago, it was the lightest thing on the market. Even as recently as a couple of years ago, it was the lightest binding available with the set of features it offers. Technology has moved on, lightening the load, while the Speed Turn holds strong with its design. In the grand scheme, it is lighter than most but not as svelte as those in the top of this scoring metric.
Depending on your other options and what you are coming from, the Speed Turn will likely feel and perform very lightweight. Only as compared to skimo race-style bindings and the newest of all-around bindings do the Speed Turn come in heavy.
Long term testing of this model and of its predecessors indicates great durability. With years of experience with this and its prior versions, we have more faith in the durability of the Speed Turn than with almost any other binding we have tested. In absolute terms, the simple construction is indeed quite durable, but nothing special.
The Speed Turn is one of the only bindings we tested that combine lateral release, ski/tour mode transition, and heel elevation adjustment into one function. This multi-purpose simplicity results in a durable, easy-to-service form. On the other hand, other award winners use three different mechanical functions to perform these same three tasks. Extra moving parts always raise an eyebrow. We like the elegant simplicity of the Dynafit Speed Turn, and our long-term experience backs this up.
This product wins our Best Buy Award. For hundreds of dollars less than the competition, you make some very minor compromises. Many experienced, patient and careful backcountry skiers will not notice these issues at all. At any price, the simplicity and proven design of the Speed Turn is worth considering.
The Speed Turn 2.0 is a no-frills binding that tours fine but without a lot of extras. Its biggest detractions are its lack of a ski-brake option and marginally harder-to-learn heel lifters. If you can deal with these things, the Speed Turn 2.0 is a very dependable and lightweight binding at an unbeatable price. It is only in recent years that iterative improvements in AT ski bindings have improved on the function of the Dynafit Speed Turn, overall.Our lead test editor, as recently as just a couple of years back, was choosing this binding for his personal skis. When you consider the low price of the Speed Turn, you need to think long and hard about whether some small improvements for the "top of the heap" bindings are worth the hundreds of extra dollars. The Speed Turn is an excellent binding, at a reasonable price.
— Jediah Porter & Ian Nicholson
Ad-free. Influence-free. Powered by Testing.
GearLab is founded on the principle of honest, objective, reviews. Our experts test thousands of products each year using thoughtful test plans that bring out key performance differences between competing products. And, to assure complete independence, we buy all the products we test ourselves. No cherry-picked units sent by manufacturers. No sponsored content. No ads. Just real, honest, side-by-side testing and comparison.Learn More