The Original Muck Boot Company Arctic Sport Review
Cons: Too warm for most uses, too tight to easily slip on and off
Manufacturer: The Original Muck Boot Company
Compare to Similar Products
The Original Muck Boot Company Arctic Sport
|Price||$164.95 at Amazon||$149.95 at Amazon|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$101.93 at Amazon||$222.00 at Amazon||$49.95 at REI|
Compare at 2 sellers
|Pros||Extremely warm, grippy||Lightweight, great traction, adjustable fit, everything you want in a boot||Well insulated, ideal comfort, easy to take on and off||Great looks, extremely warm and comfortable, versatile||Highly waterproof, stiff construction for rough terrain, great traction|
|Cons||Too warm for most uses, too tight to easily slip on and off||A bit pricy, cushioning in midsole is slightly lacking||Lower shaft height, less traction||Expensive, included wool insole can be too warm for all conditions||Looser fit, lacks insulation|
|Bottom Line||These boots are too much for urban use, but are perfect for those who require top-notch warmth and water resistance||You won't go wrong with these boots, no matter what you're using them for||These boots easily won our testers' hearts due to their uncompromisingly solid construction, comfort, and warmth||If you want a boot that looks and performs as good as it feels, this may be the boot for you||If you're looking for a classic rubber rain boot, this is the best one we've found at a solid price|
|Rating Categories||Arctic Sport||Bogs Workman||Bogs Classic Ultra High||Blundstone Thermal Chelsea||Baffin Enduro|
|Weather Protection (30%)|
|Specs||Arctic Sport||Bogs Workman||Bogs Classic Ultra...||Blundstone Thermal...||Baffin Enduro|
|Weight per Pair (lbs)||5.74 lbs||4.97 lbs||5.76 lbs||2.93 lbs||5.49 lbs|
|Flood Height (inches from bottom of sole to lowest point at top of shaft)||17.6"||14.75"||12"||6.7"||16.3"|
|Mouth Circumference (inches)||15.25"||16"||17"||9.75"||17.5"|
|Lining/Insulation||Fleece||7.5MM Neo-Tech waterproof insulation||7mm waterproof Neo-Tech insulation||Thinsulate||Synthetic|
|Upper Material||Rubber||Neotech/Rubber||Rubber||Leather + Elastic||Rubber|
|Outsole Material||MS-1 molded outsole||BioGrip slip resistant outsole||Siped self-cleaning non-slip rubber||TPU Outsole||Rubber|
|Insole||EVA molded midsole with contoured footbed and 2mm thermal foam underlay||Modular Algae-based EVA footbed||Aegis antimicrobial contoured insole||Removable sheepskin insulated insole||Gel-Flex shock-absorbing heels and midsoles|
|Unique Features||Neoprene shaft, thick insulation, and aggressive outsole||Seamless Construction to reduce weight + Heel Lock||Easy to put on due to handles, easy to take off due to heel studs, neoprene shaft||Cushioned Midsole||Aggressive outsole|
|Width Options||Regular||Regular||Regular||Regular + Wide||Regular|
|Sizing info||Order next size up||Order next size up||Order next size up||Order next size up||Order your true size|
Our Analysis and Test Results
The Arctic Sport did extremely well in our tests, beating all the other boots in three categories — weather protection, traction, and warmth. However, due to being so stellar in these three categories, there are some downsides: they are clunky, constrictive, and hot for casual use, thus scoring low in comfort and style. Nonetheless, this boot is great when you actually need it, and its fleece-lined neoprene insulation, heavily studded outsole and cushioned midsole will keep you happy for hours in even the worst conditions.
The Arctic Sport has the highest shaft in our test, and measures in at 17.6" from sole to top. And since the top of the boot slightly constricts on the calf due to some well-designed elastic, this further reduces the chance of splashes getting in.
When wearing these boots, it's easy to feel invincible, striding confidently into bodies of water. We knew we wouldn't get wet wearing these boots in any weather, which is a far cry from our experience in many other models. We originally weren't sure that the neoprene upper would be fully waterproof, but we twisted and stretched it with our hands underwater and found no leaks whatsoever. Impressive.
It's hard to talk about comfort in the Arctic Sport because they are so specifically designed for cold use. In warm weather, you will have a hard time wearing these for more than an hour due to their absurd warmth.
Wearing these in warmer temps is doable if you don't mind sweaty feet, but it's not pleasant. However, in cold weather, these boots are the best in the test. And underfoot, the EVA padded footbed (and additional thermal padding) keep the feet cushioned and comfortable. Yet since these boots are rated for a very specific temperature range (we wouldn't want to wear these above 45°F), we can't give them a high comfort score. The boot's weight also factors into its comfort rating — they're pretty heavy at 5.74 lbs. While this means they're great for bigger tasks, they're a little heavy for casual jaunts.
The Arctic Sport boots have great traction. No matter what surface you find yourself on, whether you're running up grassy hills, trying to skid in mud, walking along creek beds, or walking on snow, you won't slip. We did skate around a bit on pure ice, but that's hard to avoid.
The large, separated studs on the outsole grip all surfaces equally, and we love how secure it feels.
With neoprene insulation and a fleece lining, as well as a 2mm thermal underlay, the Arctic Sport boots earn a perfect 10 for warmth.
We love how these boots feel in cold conditions and, with thick socks, we're willing to entertain the manufacturer's claim that these boots can go down to -40°F. During our bathtub ice water test, we spent over 20 minutes in the Arctic Sport boots, barefoot and without moving, before declaring them the unequivocal winners, as our feet were only just beginning to feel any chill at all (and we'd cut the other boots when our feet became uncomfortably cold).
The Arctic Sport rank in the middle of the pack for style, though some of our style consultants like their chunky aesthetic quite a bit.
However, unless you live in a chillier, wetter climate than we do (rainy Seattle), you're probably not going to be casually wearing these out for drinks and a movie. Though we have done that…
These size 13 boots fit our size 12 feet well, with a half-inch of forward and back wiggle room, and minimal room left and right (for our D-width forefeet), so they probably come in between a D and an E width. They also have a relatively low volume, so they hold the ankles well and don't flap around.
The Arctic Sport are some of the most expensive rain boots in the test, but they will keep you safe and warm when none of the other boots will. And if you're going to be spending time in the sort of weather that would require these boots, you shouldn't be skimping on footwear. We're sure these boots will last a long time with their reinforced components and high-quality construction. However, if you won't be spending consistent time in horribly cold and wet conditions, we'd recommend you get a more affordable, more comfortable, less hard-core boot.
We've personally never worked in cold enough conditions that would require the Arctic Sport boots, but we don't doubt that some (perhaps Midwesterners?) will need these boots for their impressive 17.6" shaft height, reliable traction, and fleece-lined insulation. For the rest of us, these boots are overkill, due to their intense warmth, average style, and general clunkiness. However, there is something truly wonderful about how warm and dry we feel in these boots which is why we had to award them a Top Pick Award for bad weather.
— Richard Forbes