Sorel Madson II Chukka Review
Compare prices at 2 resellers Pros: Lightweight, very stylish, comfortable
Cons: Flood height is a low 2.75", slightly narrow for standard width feet, expensive
Compare to Similar Products
Sorel Madson II Chukka
|Price||$87.48 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$164.95 at Amazon||$131.00 at Amazon||$64.99 at Amazon||$55.00 at REI|
Compare at 2 sellers
|Pros||Lightweight, very stylish, comfortable||Extremely weatherproof, decently lightweight, great traction||Extremely warm, grippy||Affordable, well-insulated, great traction||Highly waterproof, stiff construction for rough terrain, great traction|
|Cons||Flood height is a low 2.75", slightly narrow for standard width feet, expensive||Pretty pricey, thin-feeling underfoot||Too warm for most uses, too tight to easily slip on and off||Not as comfortable as other models||Looser fit, lacks insulation|
|Bottom Line||These rain boots are a stylish choice if your main priority is staying dry in the city||These boots performed highly in every test we threw at them, and we're confident they'll keep you dry and happy||This impressive boot will keep you toasty when all else fails, though they'll be far too warm for normal conditions||While we love many of the innovative aspects of these boots, we wish they could provide more support underfoot||This workhorse boasts a very fair price for such a rugged boot|
|Rating Categories||Sorel Madson II Chukka||Wetland||Arctic Sport||Kamik Icebreaker||Baffin Enduro|
|Weather Protection (30%)|
|Specs||Sorel Madson II Chukka||Wetland||Arctic Sport||Kamik Icebreaker||Baffin Enduro|
|Weight per Pair (size 13)||2.4 lbs||4.72 lbs||5.74 lbs||4.58 lbs||5.49 lbs|
|Flood Height (inches from bottom of sole to lowest point at top of shaft)||2.75"||18"||17.6"||14.3 in||16.3"|
|Mouth Circumference (inches)||14.5"||18.75"||15.25"||16.5"||17.5"|
|Lining/Insulation||Synthetic and textile||5 mm neoprene||Fleece||Moisture wicking removable Zylex liner||Synthetic|
|Upper Material||Waterproof suede||Rubber||Rubber||Rubber with waterproof adjustable nylon collar||Rubber|
|Outsole Material||Molded rubber||Rubber||MS-1 molded outsole||TRACKER synthetic Rubber||Rubber|
|Insole||EVA||EVA||EVA molded midsole with contoured footbed and 2mm thermal foam underlay||11mm Zylex insole||Gel-Flex shock-absorbing heels and midsoles|
|Unique Features||Seam-sealed waterproof suede construction||Breathable air mesh lining||Neoprene shaft, thick insulation, and aggressive outsole||Drawstring, Zylex liner||Aggressive outsole|
|Sizing info||Order next size up||Order next size up||Order next size up||Order next size up||Order your true size|
Our Analysis and Test Results
The Madson II Chukka fits into Sorel's "Madson" lineup — a series of waterproof boots that are designed to look good and be comfortable. This lineup is not designed to be super-waterproof, and as a result, the Chukka have a pretty low flood height. Still, they're pretty practical boots, as they're dressy enough to be worn in the city without attracting any weird looks. We found them to be perfect for comfortably kicking around town, but we wouldn't recommend them for anyone who plans to spend a lot of time in the mud.
We tested the Madson Moc Toe back in 2019, and the Chukka has the same major issues. The gussets (the folds between the tongue and the boot proper) aren't waterproof, and as a result, the flood height of the boot is only 2.75". This means that even small puddles can get your feet wet, especially if you don't tie the laces tightly. We found that these were waterproof enough for most rainy situations, but they really aren't that protective. If only the boots had waterproof gussets, their flood height would double (to ~ 5"). But alas, Sorel didn't want to go to the extra trouble.
The Chukka is the lightest in our test, weighing in at only 2.4 lbs, and as a result, you'll barely notice you're wearing them, especially compared to some of the 5+ lb clunkers in our test. We love lighter boots like these because they let us forget how long we've been up and on our feet.
Our biggest issue with these boots is that they're narrower than any others in our test, though we realize this narrower cut is part of the aesthetic. This didn't feel great with our slightly wider feet, but we'll get into this more in the "Fit" section below. We also wish the insole was a bit thicker, but the midsoles are cushioned enough to make these comfortable for full days on your feet.
The new outsole is the best part of the upgrades from the 2019 Madson to this newer Madson II. We were relatively unimpressed by the outsole on the 2019 Madson — it just had a series of semi-lugged ridges. This new outsole is a lot more solid, with deeper lugs, more lateral traction, and the rubber compound feels stickier.
As a result, the outsole on the Chukka feels significantly grippier on pretty much all the surfaces we tested, from wet grass to muck. If you'll be on the slickest of surfaces, you'll want a heavier-duty boot with more studs, but for most conditions, you should feel confident with these boots.
Since the Chukka is made of suede (leather), it does a better job of insulating your feet than similarly insulated rubber. As a result, these boots kept our feet comfortable for a solid five minutes in the ice bath test (compared to the 30 seconds we were getting from similar rubber boots). At the same time, leather also breathes better than solid rubber, and so we found that these boots are also pretty comfortable in warmer conditions.
These boots aren't the best choice if you're planning to spend a lot of time in chilly conditions, and with their narrower fit, you won't be able to easily wear thicker socks. However, if you're not planning to stand around in the cold, these will be perfectly comfortable as long as you're in 20+ degree temps.
If nothing else, these boots are stylish. The chukka design has been around and popular since the 1940s. According to Wikipedia, chukkas can be worn with suits or with jeans, so feel to wear these to a wedding! You definitely can't say that about any of the other boots in our test. Our style consultants all agreed — these boots look great, and everyone around will be admiring your style.
These boots felt a bit small for our D-width feet, but we think that's because they run pretty narrow. After breaking the leather in over a few weeks, they got more comfortable, but they still didn't fit perfectly. So if you've got wider feet, we'd recommend steering clear of the Chukka. Otherwise, we were wearing size 13 boots on our size 12 feet, and that gave us just enough toe wiggle room to feel good.
It's tricky to talk about the value when it comes to these boots because they're definitely expensive. However, they're much more versatile than most of the rubber rain boots in our test, as they can also double as casual around-town shoes. You can probably even get away with using them as dress boots. And since they're made of high-quality suede, they're both breathable and warm enough for most weather conditions you'll find. However, if you're just looking for a good pair of rain boots, you can find a lot more water resistance for a lot less money if you look elsewhere in our test.
Overall, these Chukka boots do a great job at being a lightweight dressy boot for rainy days. If you get them because you need something heavy-duty for working outdoors, you'll be disappointed. But if you want a pair of comfortable city boots that will keep your feet dry in most types of weather (but not puddles or deeper water), we recommend them.
— Richard Forbes