Sierra Designs LT Strike 2 Review
Cons: One of the weakest tents tested, hard to achieve a tight fly pitch, only two mid level guypoints, steep walls catch wind easily, bottom of walls are not waterproof.
Manufacturer: Sierra Designs
Our Analysis and Test Results
The LT Strike uses a unique "Eye Pole" design that maximizes headroom with minimal weight. Two sections of the pole connect with plastic hubs to create a large -<>- shape (see photo below) with a large amount of interior space that has steep walls. The 27 sq. ft. interior space can actually be used! A moderate 37" peak height provides enough space to sit up and two 9 sq. ft. vestibules provide plenty of covered area for a pair of shoes and a pack.
The LT Strike 2 is one of the weakest tents tested. The pole design only connects to the ground in two places, which only allows for two mid-level guy points. We do not believe it's suitable for serious three-season storms. Further, the inner tent lacks a critical feature found on almost all other tents: the bottom of the walls are not waterproof and, thus, splashback can soak them and anything inside that touches them. The pole design puts a lot of tension on the two ground level guy points that don't hold poles. It's important to stake these out well. Otherwise the inner and outer tent walls will not be tight. In other words, you must stake all four ground level points out every time. There's no clip to relieve tension from the vestibule zippers.
Weight and Packed Size
The tent weighs 59 oz. or 3 lb. 11 oz. with stakes. This is 27 ounces heavier than the lightest two-person tent tested. It packs reasonably small.
The LT Strike receives a zero here (the highest score is 3) because it must be pitched in the exact same way every time, which can be a drawback for long distance hikers or anyone forced to camp in sites that don't allow an optimal pitch. ultralight tents offer far more adaptability.
The tent is highly limited by it's weak pole design. It looks cool but it's not confidence inspiring. The LT Strike's space-to-weight ratio is exactly the average of the 24 tents we've tested; there's much room for improvement. Better fabrics would help.
Camping in protected areas.
High price and moderate-to-low performance.
— Chris McNamara and Max Neale