MSR Remote 2 Review

The MSR Remote 2 is a jack-of-all-trades 4 season tent. The Remote was equally at home on extended expeditions and mountain adventures in the summer. While you can buy a model that might do specific activities better, its hard to find a model that does as well at everything.

Performance Comparison

Ease of Set-up

This is one of the easiest 4 season tents to set up. Save for the vestibule pole, two of the three poles that make up the body of the tent connect via a central hub. This design lets the poles snap together quickly, and then they clip into place using secure plastic taps. The third body pole inserts easily as well. This is one of the least challenging models to set up in a storm. In real-world use, we found this design noticeably easier in windier conditions than other models that utilized pole sleeves, such as The North Face Mountain 25.

Weather and Storm Resistance

The Remote 2 gives you robust four-season protection for mountaineering and winter camping. Since two of the poles are always attached to the central hub at the top of the tent, this tent is significantly stronger than if the poles weren't. For example, we found the Remote was noticeably more bomber in heavy winds than the REI Arete ASL 2 and The North Face Assault 2.


The guyline attachment points on the fly are bomber and are reinforced from the inside minimizing the chance that they'll tear during a storm. For genuinely gnarly weather, all the guyline points have a corresponding Velcro flap on the inside of the fly to attach it directly to the poles, which lets the guylines support the poles better. While we rarely used this feature in the lower 48 and southern Canadian ranges, it adds to the versatility of this tent, and it's a feature we'd likely utilize on a peak like Denali and early season or winter ascents of Mt. Rainier.


Burying the snow flaps also further increase the tent's storm-worthiness. We used this tent in several fierce storms and were impressed with how well its design held up against wind and snow loading. The Remote is on the higher end of the storm-worthy spectrum and we'd take this model most place. In the end, it's not quite as burly as the Black Diamond Fitzroy, The North Face Mountain 25, or the Mountain Hardwear Trango 2, but it is lighter than those models. We found it pretty comparable to the Hilleberg Jannu, our Editors' Choice Award winner, but thought the Jannu was slightly more wind resistant.

Weight and packed size

The Remote 2's minimum weight is 6 lbs 8 oz (just the fly, body, and poles) and was 6 lbs 15 oz packed weight with what most people would likely actually bring, which includes things like guylines, stakes, and the pole bag. A 6 lbs 15 oz packed weight isn't too bad for a tent of this size with a massive vestibule. The Remote is slightly heavier than the Hilleberg Jannu, but also had more headroom and floor space. The Remote is notably lighter than its marginally more expedition worthy competition, like TNF Mountain 25 (8 lbs 8 oz packed weight) or the Mountain Hardwear Trango 2 (8 lb. 15 oz minimum weight and 9 lbs 13 oz packed weight).

Livability and Comfort

The Remote 2 has 33 square feet of interior space and a massive 22 square foot vestibule area. TNF Mountain 25 also has 33 square feet of interior space, but is a little longer and better for taller people. The Remote is a little wider and had more room for keeping equipment inside the tent.


While hardly a necessity, it is nice to have two doors, and the Remote 2 was the lightest double wall tent have them. What sets the Remote 2 apart from most other models is its massive hooped vestibule, which is supported by a fourth pole and helps this tent feel huge.

The Remote had good headroom, but not the best. It had noticeably more headroom than the Hilleberg Jannu and MSR Arete ASL 2, but nearly as much as the Moutain Hardwear Trango 2 or Black Diamond Ahwahnee.

Adaptability and Versatility

This is a fairly versatile 4 season tent, and because of its double-wall design, it could also work for occasional three season use. The interior fabric offered okay breathability, slightly better than the Mountain Hardwear Trango 2 and similar, but maybe not quite as good as TNF Mountain 25.


To help manage moisture there is a zippered mesh panel featured on each of the two doors. This panel has a flap that is roughly half the size of each door. This helped some but overall this tent managed condensation just so-so for a double wall tent. This is another time where we felt the huge vestibule was nice because in stormier weather we would leave the vestibule-side door entirely open to help better manage moisture and condensation build-up. The vestibule is so big and has storm flaps, and we almost never had any issues with snow and spindrift combing into the main body of the tent.

Overall, the Remote 2 was one of the more versatile 4 season models. It's light enough for many summertime mountaineering adventures, and burly enough for winter camping. It's likely a little too heavy and bulky for ski touring and carry-over alpine climbs.

Best Applications

The Remote 2 is a more traditional 4 season tent that is still not super heavy and will handle rain and stormy conditions better than any of its single-wall counterparts. It's plenty burly for mountaineering in the lower 48, and we'd certainly consider taking this tent to some place like Denali or Aconcagua. It's not quite spacious enough for expedition use though.

Value

At $800, this is one of the more expensive double wall tents in our review. It is built to last and has several notable features, but it's a lot more expensive than some of its closest competition, like TNF Mountain 25 ($589), or the Trango 2 ($650). It is still less than the Hilleberg Jannu ($935) and Hilleberg Tarra ($1095). Since it includes a vestibule, keep that in mind when comparing this model to the Black Diamond Fitzroy ($800) and Eldorado ($700), which don't (it's an additional $160).

Conclusion

The MSR Remote 2 is a versatile 4 season tent that is a little less expedition focused and more of an all-around option. It is stormy-worthy enough to take to remote and harsh environments, but it isn't quite as spacious as a true expedition tent. What it gives up in spaciousness it makes up for in weight and packed volume. This makes it more practical to take on shorter duration mountaineering adventures in the lower-48 or similar destinations.