Hands-on Gear Review

Arbor Wasteland Review

2017/18 Arbor Collective Wasteland
Top Pick Award
Price:  $600 List | $419.97 at Backcountry
Compare prices at 3 resellers
Pros:  Fun, nimble, floaty, appealing to the eye.
Cons:  Weak pop, stout price tag.
Bottom line:  Good intro board for everyday riding.
Editors' Rating:   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Shape:  Twin
Camber/Rocker:  Rocker
Flex:  Medium
Manufacturer:   Arbor

Our Verdict

The Arbor Wasteland is a exceptional twin-tip board with the classic Arbor wood look and cool tip/tail shape. It's rocker'd base profile makes it fun, easily maneuverable, and floaty in powder. Because of the medium flex and the fact that it's not cambered, the pop suffers a little, and the rocker also makes it a little less stable than most in the fleet. Its overall shape is very similar to the Jones Explorer, Capita Defenders of Awesome, and the Never Summer Proto Type Two we tested, which are cool looking shapes. It is priced a little heavy though, at $600, and while it's a great board, it does not ride well enough to warrant the price tag.

Graphics Update
For the 2017/18 season Arbor Collective has updated the look of the Wasteland (pictured above) with a simpler, cleaner design.
If you prefer last year's topsheet, it's currently still available as a limited edition model.



RELATED REVIEW: The Best All-Mountain Snowboards of 2018


Our Analysis and Test Results

Review by:
Chris Edmands
Review Editor

Last Updated:
Thursday
February 9, 2017

Share:

At first, based solely on appearance, we thought this board would perform in a similar fashion as the Never Summer Proto Type Two and the Jones Explorer. It's a great ride, especially if you have nothing to compare it to, but once tested side-by-side with others, it lost some ground. It's a shame because we had higher hopes for this board, but it just didn't fare as well as some of the others. However, it still wins our Top Pick for The Weekend Warrior

Performance Comparison


Kurt Wastell fooling around with a timeless tweak -- the Japan air.
Kurt Wastell fooling around with a timeless tweak -- the Japan air.

Edging and Carving


Scoring lower than most, a 7 out of 10, the Wasteland suffered in this category mainly because of its rocker. Its two Magne-Traction bumps on each side were not enough to make up for this while carving, but the smaller sidecut radius did help it transfer from edge to edge. When compared to its closest competitor, the Capita Defender of Awesome, it shared a similar weight, flex, and shape, but had a longer and more stable sidecut. Compared to the Jones Explorer, its second closest competitor, it failed to match in stability simply because the Jones Explorer is directional, vs. the twin Wasteland, and is a bit stiffer.

Edging detail on the Wasteland.
Edging detail on the Wasteland.

Float in Powder


The Wasteland rose to the occasion in pow thanks to it being rockered, lightweight, and not super stiff. It scored the same as the Rossignol One LF, which is directional, coming in at 9 out of 10. More often than not, a directional shape will give you more float because you are not centered on the board but set back, and this is one twin that handles pow very well. It also scored the same as the Never Summer Proto Type Two and the Lib Tech T Rice Pro. Although the Never Summer Proto Type Two is a little heavier and not completely rockered, it's softer, putting up less of a fight in pow. Now, the Lib-Tech Proto Type Two scored well in pow, mainly because it's larger than the others tested. Usually, a stiffer and heavier board won't perform as well as softer and lighter competitors.

Stability at Speed


Fully rockered boards simply aren't as stable at speed as the hybrids, or more stable yet, the cambered ones. The banana'd nature of the decks make for less contact with the snow. Less contact equals less control. Less control equals less stability. The Burton Custom Flying V was the only other board to receive a score of 7 out of 10 in stability. Both it and the Wasteland are fully rockered. All the other boards we tested earned higher marks in the stability metric, as they made better contact with the riding surface.

Playfulness


Slashing a lip and throwing some snow.  This is what messing around looks like for Kurt Wastell.
Slashing a lip and throwing some snow. This is what messing around looks like for Kurt Wastell.

Light on the scale and a rockered profile help make this board a high scorer in this category. Clunky and heavy don't trend well for boards looking to be considered "fun." In comparison, the Never Summer Proto Type Two and the Burton Flying-V are heavier than the Wasteland but because they are a bit softer they were just as fun. The Wasteland earned a 9 out of 10, as it was nimble and pleasing from day one.

Pop


It's a shame it's as rockered as it is. A little less, and this board could have been a tippy-top contender, but it just didn't snap as well as we wanted it to. That's only a concern if you're looking for epic snap. But because this Arbor did well in other areas, it's easy to overlook where it fell short. It scored a 7 out of 10 for pop like the Jones Explorer, Lib Tech T Rice Pro, and the Rossignol One LF. All four of these boards are rockered or hybrid, which causes them to lose a bit of snap, as there's less resistance when trying to spring up off the snow. The only non-cambered board that scored better in pop was Never Summer's Proto Type Two.

Best Applications


Those new to snowboarding, or not asking a lot, will find plenty of happiness all over the mountain on this one.

Arbor Wasteland model detail.
Arbor Wasteland model detail.

Value


Because of the high price tag ($600) it just doesn't make sense to go with this one. Try the Jones Explorer, which took home our Best Buy Award, costing $479.

Arbor Wasteland base.
Arbor Wasteland base.

Conclusion


If you like the wood look, love the Arbor name, have the cash, and aren't too picky, you'll enjoy this board.

Japan air. Rider: Kurt Wastell
Japan air. Rider: Kurt Wastell

Chris Edmands

You Might Also Like

OutdoorGearLab Member Reviews


Most recent review: February 9, 2017
Summary of All Ratings

OutdoorGearLab Editors' Rating:  
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 (4.0)
Average Customer Rating:  
 (0.0)
Rating Distribution
1 Total Ratings
5 star: 0%  (0)
4 star: 100%  (1)
3 star: 0%  (0)
2 star: 0%  (0)
1 star: 0%  (0)


Have you used this product?
Don't hold back. Share your viewpoint by posting a review with your thoughts...