The Kohla Vacuum Base Zero skins offer solid and proven fabric side performance, with a unique "solution" to the adhesive side. The silicone material sticks to the base of your skis with a suction-like action. The result is field failures that appear more frequently than with "regular" glue, but a home maintenance regimen that is virtually nonexistent. We've tested these and others long enough to find that the differences, for most users, tip in favor of sticking with "regular" glued products. However, for some, the appeal of long-lasting and low-maintenance mediocre performance will outweigh the appeal of long-term replacement and maintenance costs and time in exchange for better field performance. Read on for our full summary.
Kohla Vacuum Base ZERO Review
Cons: Unique adhesive causes more-than-usual field problems
Compare to Similar Products
Kohla Vacuum Base ZERO
|Price||$200 List||$230 List||$209.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$179.95 at Amazon|
Compare at 3 sellers
|$194.95 at Amazon|
|Pros||Average to above average grip and glide, unique adhesive is low-maintenance, in the long run||Well balanced in all attributes, great glue||Light, fast gliding||Light and versatile||Light, well balanced performance, and an excellent tip attachment|
|Cons||Unique adhesive causes more-than-usual field problems||Expensive, largest and heaviest messenger||Durability concerns, limited grip||Floppy material rolls and peels, allowing some snow between ski and skin||Exclusive to Dynafit skis|
|Bottom Line||Unique, “glueless” skins for the occasional backcountry skier or the very patient enthusiast.||Virtually every aspect of skin design and construction is balanced by another competing demand; the Contour Hybrid Mix walks that tightrope, creating a product that is fully balanced.||On the balance sheet of climbing skins, the Pomoca’s lean in the fast and light direction, with associated compromises in grip and durability.||Universally compatible and high performing, these are some of the best skins on the market for whatever sticks you take into the backcountry.||Limited to being compatible with Dynafit skis, these lightweight skins strike a great balance between glide and grip.|
|Rating Categories||Kohla Vacuum Base ZERO||Contour Hybrid Mix||Pomoca Climb Pro Mohair||Glidelite Mix STS||Dynafit Speedskin|
|Glue Integrity (20%)|
|Icing Resistance (10%)|
|Specs||Kohla Vacuum Base...||Contour Hybrid Mix||Pomoca Climb Pro...||Glidelite Mix STS||Dynafit Speedskin|
|Weight per pair (grams)||530g for BD Route 95||551 for Blizzard Zero G||452g for Atomic Backland||569g for Kastle, 563g for Hannibal, 570g for Vta, 600g for Black Crows||550g|
|Material||65% Mohair, 35% Nylon||70% Mohair, 30% Synthetic||100% Mohair||65% Mohair, 35% Nylon||Mohair and Nylon mix|
|Glue||Silicone||Hybrid glue technology||Traditional||Traditional||Traditional|
|Tip Attachment||Rigid tip loop||Rigid tip loop||Rigid tip loop||Cable tip loop||Proprietary rubber knob into ski notch|
|Tail Attachment||Rubber strap||Rubber strap||Rubber strap||Rubber strap||Metal hook|
|Ski Compatibility||Universal||Universal||Universal||Universal||Compatible with Dynafit skis only|
|Precut Option?||Order for length and approximate width, cut to lateral shape||Order for length and approximate width, cut to lateral shape||Order for length and approximate width, cut to lateral shape||Order for approximate width, cut to length and lateral shape||Yes|
Our Analysis and Test Results
Kohla's Vacuum Base Zero climbing skins are made without "traditional" skin glue, which certainly sets them apart from the masses. They aren't the first or the only skins to use silicone base "adhesive", but are currently the most widely available. This design is appealing because it theoretically does better with wet conditions and is, in the long run, easier to maintain. In our experience, the silicone base definitely has its pros and cons. Read the full review below for more information.
In overall scoring, there is nothing special about the Kohla. By far their most discerning characteristic is the silicone adhesive. The plush (fabric) side strikes a great balance of grip and glide, fitting right in with the best in our review. If the pros and cons of the non-traditional adhesive balance out on the plus side for you, these are excellent skins. Basically, the adhesive is indeed more durable and lower maintenance, in the long run. However, while "on tour" in the field, these skins require a little more fiddling than skins with regular glue.
In our head to head glide testing, we were able to agree across the test team pretty closely. The fabric side of the Vacuum Base Zero is right in the middle of the pack. Whether the snow is dry or wet, you won't notice great amounts of resistance to forward progress.
Comparatively, the glide is virtually indistinguishable from that of the Best Buy Black Diamond Glidelite Mix or the Black Diamond Ultralite Mix. The Editors' Choice Contour Hybrid Mix and the Top Pick Pomoca Climb Pro Mohair both glide quite a bit better than the Kohla skins. Glide is easy to underestimate, for beginning skinners. The energy required to slide your skins forward can add up to a considerable amount. Weight your choices in favor of glide, given the option. We approve of the glide characteristics of the Kohla.
Grip is what skins do. The reason we use skins is to grip the snow. That being said, all skins grip "enough", given good technique. Since grip and glide are, in terms of design criteria, somewhat oppositional, we weight glide more heavily and discount the importance of grip. Only for beginner skinners or in real tough conditions can anyone discern between the grip of different skins.
As with glide, the Kohla Vacuum comes out in the middle of the pack, in terms of grip. This is great. The Kohla, Dynafit Speedskins, and Editors Choice Contour Hybrid Mix skins all grip as well as you'll need them to.
In this category, the Kohla Vacuum Base Zero really stands out. That silicone adhesive is truly unique within our test roster. We used one other set of silicone skins in an earlier review cycle, and liked them then too, overall. As compared to "regular" skin glue, the silicone base of these is more durable and requires less maintenance, in the long run. On any given tour, though, you are more likely to need to perform some sort of adjustment or reapplication. You can literally wash these skins in your sink at home. If your kid wraps the cat in your Kohla skins, you simply rinse off the hair with soap and water. You definitely cannot do that with traditional glued skins. On the other hand, almost regardless of temperatures and moisture content, you are more likely to experience ski/skin delamination out in the backcountry with the siliconed Kohla Vacuum. This is annoying and time consuming but is easily resolved with a ski-off, skin cleaning rest break.
The adhesive design informs the ease of use. Like we mention above, you have a choice to make. Do you want in-field fiddling in exchange for toss-it-in-the-corner at home ease? Or would you rather take some care and put in some work at home and get better field performance? With other minor usability concerns, this seems to be the question informing ones choice of the Kohla or not.
We tested long enough to discover that, if you lose a traditionally glued skin once about every five days of skinning, you will lose your Kohla Vacuum skin once about every one day of skinning. Essentially, you are going to remount your Kohla skins about five times more frequently than your regular glued skins, all else equal. Now, regular glued skins degrade with time and use, while the silicone base of the Kohla does not. If you are sloppy with maintenance and replacement of your regular glued skins, you will kick them off more frequently, while skin adhesion failure of the Kohla will not appreciably change with clumsy maintenance. Our test team went "round and round" on the question of "well, is the silicone better than regular glue?" We didn't heartily agree, but the consensus is that regular glue is a little better. We'd rather, overall, deal with the glue maintenance at home than in the field.
It is for the truly different adhesion that the Kohla Vacuum earns our Top Pick award. For that subset of the skiing population that doesn't mind some field fiddling in exchange for worry-free long-term maintenance, the Kohla is a valuable addition to the market. The majority of users will be better served by "traditional" glue, but the silicone adhesion of these is going to appeal to some.
Choose the Kohla Vacuum Base Zero if you want skins that will last a long time with absolutely no at-home maintenance. You will pay for that ease with more frequent in-field issues, but those in-field issues are easily resolved. Traditional glued skins, like the Editors' Choice Contour Hybrid Mix, require some love at home but work better in the wild.
All skins collect ice and snow, on the fabric side, in some conditions. The biggest variable that informs this, over the long term, is waxing of your skins. Waxed skins resist icing better than nonwaxed skins, by far. There are more subtle differences, mainly in the balance and presence of nylon vs. mohair and the factory pretreatment of the skins, that inform icing proclivity.
With all this in mind, the mohair/nylon blend of the Kohla Vacuum seems to resist icing as well as most will need. Fully nylon skins like the Black Diamond Ascension resist icing the best, but that comes with other significant drawbacks. The Kohla Vacuum is right in line with the Editors' Choice Contour Hybrid and the Best Buy Black Diamond Mohair Mix, in terms of icing.
Because skins are cut to the length and width of your skis, comparing exact dimensions and mass is problematic. We do indeed weigh and measure the skins but calibrate that, informally, against surface area to deduce actual relative weight and bulk. When we do that, the Kohla skins are among the more packable skins we assessed.
Pretty much all the mohair/nylon blend skins are the same weight and bulk.
This metric is easy to report on. Basically, the Vacuum Base Zero skins can be cut for use with any skis. We dig this.
Only a couple of skins are available only for use on certain skis. This is an important thing to mention and note, but it doesn't really inform your choices too much.
These are perhaps best for the very occasional backcountry skier who has patience and skill for the field side of things but doesn't want to treat their skins like another member of the family the other 363 days of the year.
Since they will last a long time with little to no maintenance, these are an ok value. The field performance suffers, as compared to others, but the low maintenance costs (in terms of dollars and time) can tip the balance.
Every few years some new "technology" promises to disrupt the climbing skin business. We follow the trends and hold on for the ride, but these "upgrades" rarely exceed the performance of the "tried and true" formula. The silicone adhesive of the Kohla can be seen either way. For a very small subset of users, this is exactly what you've been looking for. For most, though, the regular glue technology is still preferred.
— Jediah Porter