The world's most in-depth and scientific reviews of gear

Salomon Amphib Bold - Women's Review

A great shoe for the runner looking to splash confidently through wet terrain, the Amphib Bold isn't quite specific enough to perform highly on the water.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Price:  $100 List | $99.10 at Amazon
Compare prices at 2 resellers
Pros:  Lightweight, durable, somewhat versatile
Cons:  Sizing runs large, adjustability is lacking, uncomfortable in bare feet
Manufacturer:   Salomon
By Monica Nigon ⋅ Review Editor  ⋅  Feb 14, 2020
  • Share this article:
Our Editors independently research, test, and rate the best products. We only make money if you purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Learn more
64
OVERALL
SCORE


RANKED
#4 of 6
  • Comfort - 25% 5
  • Traction - 25% 7
  • Versatility - 15% 6
  • Warmth - 15% 7
  • Durability - 10% 7
  • Sensitivity - 10% 7

Our Verdict

The women's Salomon Amphib Bold is perhaps more of a running shoe with water capabilities than a water shoe with running capabilities. While they have decent traction and durability, they lacked in comfort, especially when skipping socks or liners. They are one of the lightest shoes we tested, but they ran at least a half size too big and felt loose around the heel when the single-pull lace was tightened. If you're a trail runner with great arch strength who wants to plow through puddles, these would be a good buy. If you're purely a water enthusiast, you'll want to find a different shoe.


Compare to Similar Products

Our Analysis and Test Results

The Amphib Bold is a lightweight sneaker touted by Salomon as "a water shoe you can run in." We'd say it's more of a running shoe that can get wet. It is quite lightweight at 13 ounces, which we like. The mesh exterior provides great ventilation and dries quickly. Our testers were surprised at the relatively good traction, yet this was negated by a lack of versatility and a fit that left something to be desired.

Performance Comparison


While the Amphib Bold is durable and has decent sensitivity  we found them lacking in comfort.
While the Amphib Bold is durable and has decent sensitivity, we found them lacking in comfort.

Comfort


While the Amphib Bold is lightweight and ventilates well, its biggest flaw was a poor fit and irritation on the skin when worn with bare feet. In the experience of our lear tester, when the single-lace pull was tightened, it only tightened around the arch and ball of the foot, leaving the heel loose. One shoe even came off entirely in a desperate bid to high-side a raft to prevent a flip (it was luckily retrieved at the bottom of the raft). It also ran at least a half-size too big, leaving a floppy toe box that presented somewhat of a tripping hazard. It didn't protect our feet from rocks and obstructions well with its light construction. It was necessary to wear socks with the Ampib Bolds, as the seams caused discomfort with bare feet.

The single-pull lace system  while convenient  only tightened the top and arch  leaving the heel loose. The shoe also runs at least a half-size too big. Irritating seams make them less than ideal for sockless feet.
The single-pull lace system, while convenient, only tightened the top and arch, leaving the heel loose. The shoe also runs at least a half-size too big. Irritating seams make them less than ideal for sockless feet.

A socked tester with narrow feet found the Amphib Bold mostly comfortable on a longer side hike and day on the river. It seems the shoe narrower feet better. Some people may be fine with the comfort of these shoes when wearing socks, but we place a lot of worth on an amphibious shoe being comfortable without socks. This model didn't quite hit the target in this metric.

Traction


Our testers were pleasantly surprised with the traction offered by the Amphib Bold. Salomon's Contagrip FD, with siped lugs, stuck well to rafts and wet rocks. We felt comfortable trusting the traction on a long scout mission, navigating a few wet logs and mossy rocks. The lugs dug into soft surfaces as well, performing with excellence on a steep, sandy approach to the river. The solid traction reinforces their application as a trail runner.

The Salomons showed surprisingly good traction  with deep lugs for softer surfaces and sticky rubber. Yet other models we tested had better traction across all surfaces.
The Salomons showed surprisingly good traction, with deep lugs for softer surfaces and sticky rubber. Yet other models we tested had better traction across all surfaces.

Versatility


While the Amphib Bold is indeed a nice running shoe that can withstand water immersion, it seems to only fit a small subset of foot shapes and felt minimalist. On a run, our testers found they didn't quite have the arch strength to go long distances and adequately absorb the shock.

Worn with socks, it was a decent hiking shoe. Just make sure to size down at least a half size. They aren't our favorites for swimming, since one popped off while we were wearing them in the water, and aren't that comfy without socks.

Warmth


For warmth on the water, the ability to add layers for different conditions is paramount. The Amphib Bold is adjustable enough to wear neoprene socks or a drysuit, but the fit around the heel was compromised when the shoe was tightened. The shape of the lacing made it so it cinches down only on the top of the foot. These wouldn't be the first choice for us when heading into cold water.

The shoes allowed for adding wool socks and a drysuit. They drained and dried quickly given their mesh and lightweight construction.
The shoes allowed for adding wool socks and a drysuit. They drained and dried quickly given their mesh and lightweight construction.

They would be a good choice for warm days since they ventilate well. They drained quickly given the mesh exterior. The upper materials dried rapidly.

Durability


Given how lightweight the Amphib Bold is, they showed only minimal signs of wear. Yet the mesh uppers probably couldn't withstand sharp sticks or rocks. It's unlikely the rubber toebox would take more scuffing against rocks or months of being jammed under a raft thwart.

The thin mesh uppers would be unlikely to take a sharp stick or rock without perforation  in our opinion.
The thin mesh uppers would be unlikely to take a sharp stick or rock without perforation, in our opinion.

Sensitivity


Given that we think the Amphib Bold is more of a running than water shoe, they are more sensitive than we initially thought they would be. We were able to feel unseen rocks and obstructions under the water, navigating the shallows confidently. They lacked in their ability to flex around objects, however, due to their deep lugs and perforated grooves on the outsole.

These shoes lacked the flexibility to bend around rocks and logs  yet are quite sensitive. We were able to feel nuances in the ground and navigate murky shallows blindly.
These shoes lacked the flexibility to bend around rocks and logs, yet are quite sensitive. We were able to feel nuances in the ground and navigate murky shallows blindly.

Value


Our testers found the Amphib Bold a bit overpriced. While they are more durable than other products tested and have a sporty look that will likely appeal to many, their lack of versatility in varying conditions and general poor fit. Yet if you are a runner with narrow, strong feet who plans to smash through creeks and puddles on your missions, they might be worth the extra bucks.

Conclusion


While quite durable, the Salomon Amphib Bold - Women's seem to fit only a narrow range of foot shapes. Because of their poor fit, it was difficult to add warm layers without compromising their comfort and general risk of them coming off entirely. They would be a great option for trail runners whose feet fit within the niche shape the shoe offers. For purely a water shoe, they come up somewhat short.

The Amphib Bolds are for the trail runner with strong and narrow feet who want to charge through puddles with confidence. It lacks in performance for purely a water shoe.
The Amphib Bolds are for the trail runner with strong and narrow feet who want to charge through puddles with confidence. It lacks in performance for purely a water shoe.


Monica Nigon