Impenetrable HyVent waterproof fabric compliments the six stylish color options of The North Face Arctic II. The hood is removable and has a fashionable faux fur ruff, giving the parka a classic winter jacket look. It's insulated with thick 550 fill down; while we were warm, this contender weighs in at 2.8 pounds and is one of the heaviest models we tested.
A classic winter parka style jacket with a faux-fur ruff around the hood, 550-fill down insulation, and a waterproof exterior - all for a reasonable price! The Arctic Parka II did a stand-up job against its contenders, especially when it came to durability.
The Arctic II is insulated with an ample amount of 550-fill-goose down, but not as much as the Marmot Montreaux or the Patagonia Down With It Parka.
We were still warm and cozy in temperatures just at freezing; anything below freezing, and we started to feel some cold air in our arms, especially when our hands were in the pockets. There is little to no down insulation on the top of the pockets, so when our hands were in them, we could feel cold air, despite being lined with microfleece. The fact that the pockets had a fleece lining on both sides helped in cold weather, but it was almost distractingly apparent that there wasn't enough down placed above the pockets. The nylon cuffs on the sleeves kept out cold air and precipitation and worked to keep the heat in.
Adding internal nylon cuffs to a winter jacket really makes a difference in cold weather. Jackets that lacked cuffs had a hard time keeping warm air in and cold air out. We also noticed in stormy weather internal cuffs did a great job at keeping precipitation out.
The Arctic II is just a little bit warmer than The North Face Metropolis Parka II, and much warmer than the Columbia Heavenly, but it wasn't as warm as the Kuhl Arktik Down Parka. Besides those jackets not having as much insulation as the Arctic Parka II, they also lacked the durable DryVent that the outer layer has. Our testing revealed that a thick, exterior layer does a better job of keeping cold air out in windy or stormy conditions.
The hood has a moderate amount of down insulation. In combination with the faux fur ruff, we noticed a difference in cold weather, compared to a jacket that had little insulation in the hood, like the Patagonia Tres Down Parka, the Arc'teryx Patera or the North Face Arrowood Triclimate Jacket. On the other hand, the Arctic II didn't have as much insulation as the Marmot Montreaux or the Canada Goose Kensington Parka. During testing, we started to notice the difference between hoods that had faux/real fur ruff vs. those that don't. Our final thought? Faux or real fur does a great job at trapping warm air in and keeping cold air out.
This is a bomber jacket for sloppy weather, especially if you are on a budget. It wasn't as waterproof as our Top Pick for Wet Weather, the Patagonia Tres Down Parka, but we were still impressed. The Fjallraven Nuuk Insulated Parka also handles slightly better in wet weather than the Arctic Parka.
The exterior layer is coated with a DryVent 2L shell that is waterproof, windproof and breathable. When were outside for an extended period in rain and snow, water beaded up and rolled off longer than a model with just a DWR (durable water repellent) finish like the Rab Deep Cover Parka or Patagonia Down With It Parka. Compared to the North Face Arrowood Triclimarte Jacket, the Arctic Parka is a better bet for cold and wet winter weather.
The Arctic Parka II did a great job in wet weather and is also budget friendly.
In prior years when we reviewed the Arctic Parka, it wasn't as waterproof as the Arc'teryx Patera. This year, the Arctic Parka II surpassed the Patera when it came to warmth and waterproofness. When water beaded up on the Patera, it had a faster saturation rate than the Arctic Parka II, which is something to consider if you are torn between the two.
Resting mid-thigh, the Arctic II has the potential to be highly fashionable - and don't get us wrong, it does have a nice look.
The only issue we have is with the sizing of the coat, which in turn messes with the style of the jacket. When we went up a size in the jacket, it became almost boxy looking in our chest and waist. It left us looking shapeless, despite having an elastic band inside at the waist.
We found this jacket stylish, but we were upset with its sizing and construction. We decided to order a size larger than we did for the last review because we wanted more room in the shoulders and arms. We got it, but then there was too much extra material in the chest and mid-section. The internal elastic waist did an okay job at adding shape to this coat, but it might lose its elasticity over time.
If form-fitting and flattering is more your style, and you're a fan of The North Face, we recommend the Metropolis Parka II or the Gotham II Hooded Down. It's not waterproof but is almost as warm as the Arctic Parka. The Metropolis also offers a more flattering style and extends all the way to the knee. We did like the Arctic II's smooth exterior appearance. The cotton/nylon blend on the exterior has a nice matte finish. Because of the DryVent shell, there isn't much exterior stitching. The faux fur ruff around the hood of the Arctic Parka II also offers extra warmth and even better style. Thumbs up to that! Our Best Buy award winner, the Eddie Bauer Sun Valley, is another great option for someone looking for a highly water-resistant jacket with a nice faux fur ruff.
The hood on the Arctic Parka II was satisfactory at trapping heat and keeping cold air out. Though it wasn't as high quality as the real fur ruffs on the Canada Goose jackets, we were still pleased. It was also quite stylish!
Despite the pockets allowing cold air in (due to lack of insulation above the pockets) when we were in cold temperatures, we were still comfortable in this cozy 550-fill-goose down parka.
The microfleece lined pockets provided even more comfort, despite the pockets lacking much insulation.
Insulated with comfortable 550-fill down, the Arctic II kept us warm when temperatures started to drop. The thick and durable outer shell did a great job at blocking cold temps and strong winds.
The Arctic II rested mid-thigh and offered better mobility than that of The North Face Metropolis Down Parka II or the Marmot Montreaux. The collar of this jacket is a bit stiff when we zipped it up all the way - almost to the point of being very uncomfortable. Fortunately, after we wore it more and more, the collar became less stiff.
The material by the chin was quite stiff the first couple times we wore the jacket. We had to break it in a bit before it was comfortable to zip all the way up.
Weighing in at 2.8 lbs, the Arctic Parka II isn't a light jacket. We also went up a size this year due to our typical size being too tight last year. It feels like there's a lot of jackets, especially in the chest area. On the plus side, the extra room allowed us to wear an extra layer underneath, though we'd prefer the jacket just fit better.
The Arctic Parka II has a DryVent exterior layer that is waterproof, windproof, and breathable - the main feature of this model. We got outside on sunny, windy days, as well as in stormy weather to test each one of these features. It didn't hold up as well as our Editors' Choice Award Winner the Canada Goose Kensington Parka, but for the price, it performed as expected. Since we last tested this jacket, The North Face added micro lined fleece pockets to both sides of the pockets, instead of only having it on one. This made all the difference, especially since there is thin insulation on the outside of the pockets.
A simple but appreciated feature, microfleece-lined pockets really make a difference in cold weather. Jackets that only had nylon on the inside didn't help keep our hands any warmer in cold weather. These pockets had a soft, cozy lining, but we wish there was down insulation in between the pockets and the front of the jacket.
There is an interior media pocket with a zipper, perfect for storing keys or a cell phone. The main zipper on the jacket is double sided for access from both ends, which also helped with mobility, even though we didn't find it that necessary since the jacket only reached mid-thigh. The sleeves have nylon cuffs at the wrist, which worked well in cold and wet weather, compared to jackets like The North Face Metropolis Parka II and the Patagonia Down With It Parka, which have no internal cuffs at all. We liked how easy it was to detach the hood and faux fur ruff on the Arctic Parka. Unlike the Patagonia Down With It Parka that uses snaps (which can sometimes be difficult to do in cold weather), the Arctic Parka II uses zippers to attach the hood and the ruff. This was easier and quicker, especially when we were in a rush.
The Arctic IIParka was one of the most durable jackets we tested, falling closely behind the Canada Goose Shelburne Parka and the our Editors' Choice Award Winner, the Canada Goose Kensington Down Parka. The highly durable DryVent outer shell is a nylon/polyester blend and is waterproof, windproof, and breathable. During the couple of months we tested, we didn't have any issues with rips or snags on the outer fabric. Besides having a thick outer shell, there are also minimal seams for feathers to escape from.
Not your average winter jacket, The North Face Arctic Parka II can handle cold temperatures and sloppy winter weather. It's a great jacket for shoveling the driveway after a big storm or window shopping in New York City.
For $299, this jacket is a great option for someone looking for a winter coat that can handle cold temperatures, and wet weather - all at a decent price. It wasn't the cheapest jacket we test, but for all that it offers, it's a good deal. Compared to our Editors' Choice Canada Goose Kensington Parka or the Canada Goose Shelburne Parka, the Arctic Parka II is a step below in quality and features, which is entirely feasible when you compare the price tags.
We were impressed with the functionality of The North Face Arctic Parka II, but we weren't completely sold on the style. Before buying this jacket, we recommend looking at the sizing chart or going to a store to try it on. We just couldn't find a size that fits well; otherwise, it was incredibly waterproof and windproof, and we didn't mind being outside in the cold and stormy weather. For the price, this jacket offers a lot of protection from winter weather, while still having a somewhat stylish look. We can't deny how much we love the faux fur ruff around the hood, which gives the jacket a winter parka vibe. If form-fitting and flattering are up your alley and price isn't an issue, check out the Editors' Choice Award Winner the Canada Goose Kensington Parka, which is also highly durable and waterproof. Another option for someone on a tight budget is the Rab Deep Cover Parka. It's super warm and stylish at an affordable price, but it isn't waterproof.