The world's most in-depth and scientific reviews of outdoor gear

The North Face Hydra 38 Review

A relatively small, lightweight pack with a full frame and a durable build.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Price:  $170 List | $169.95 at Backcountry
Pros:  Affordable, approachable, durable, comfortable frame
Cons:  Intricate frame lacks adaptability, limited carrying capacity
Manufacturer:   The North Face
By Jane Jackson ⋅ Senior Review Editor  ⋅  Aug 12, 2019
  • Share this article:
54
OVERALL
SCORE


RANKED
#16 of 16
  • Weight-to-Volume Ratio - 35% 2
  • Comfort to Carry - 25% 7
  • Features - 20% 8
  • Adaptability - 10% 6
  • Durability - 10% 7

Our Verdict

The North Face Hydra 38 is a lightweight, full-frame pack made from durable materials. Its relatively inexpensive price tag and durable design make it a good choice for various outings. Though not as high-tech as some in this review, it's a more approachable model for folks dabbling in the world of ultralight backpacking. The Hydra is very similar to our Best Buy Award Winner the Osprey Exos 48, though it lacks the adjustability of its popular competitor. With its reasonable price and durable construction, the Hydra held up against the Exos and other top models, though we had a few issues with its design.

The Hydra lacks the adaptability of other ultralight packs, which was a downside for us. The frame, lid, and waist belt are either impossible or extremely difficult to remove. This lack of versatility is a little disappointing since it limits the functionality of the pack.


Compare to Similar Products

 
Awards  Editors' Choice Award  Top Pick Award Best Buy Award 
Price $169.95 at Backcountry$270 List$260 List$145 List$104.96 at Backcountry
Compare at 2 sellers
Overall Score Sort Icon
100
0
54
100
0
87
100
0
84
100
0
76
100
0
76
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pros Affordable, approachable, durable, comfortable frameDurable, comfortable, well-designed pockets, carries light and heavy loads wellLightweight, carries light and medium loads well, adaptable, perfect feature set, more durable than mostSimple design, inexpensive, durableVery light, large volume, versatile compression system
Cons Intricate frame lacks adaptability, limited carrying capacityLarge capacity makes it less versatileA little small for a bear canisterFoam pad falls out easily, shoulder straps lack supportNo frame, poor comfort for medium loads
Bottom Line A relatively small, lightweight pack with a full frame and a durable build.This pack wowed us with its perfect set of features, comfortable design, and carrying capacity.Delivers a perfect set of features, plenty of pockets, comfortable straps, and carries well.A lightweight, simplified version of our favorite pack from this same company, making a durable, well-designed option.For the ultimate lightweight pack, this pack steals the show with its entirely frameless design and streamlined set of features.
Rating Categories The North Face Hydra 38 Gossamer Gear Mariposa Gossamer Gear Gorilla Ultralight Adventure Equipme... Granite Gear Virga 2
Weight To Volume Ratio (35%)
10
0
2
10
0
7
10
0
8
10
0
8
10
0
10
Comfort To Carry (25%)
10
0
7
10
0
10
10
0
10
10
0
6
10
0
5
Features (20%)
10
0
8
10
0
10
10
0
7
10
0
8
10
0
7
Adaptability (10%)
10
0
6
10
0
8
10
0
8
10
0
8
10
0
6
Durability (10%)
10
0
7
10
0
9
10
0
9
10
0
9
10
0
8
Specs The North Face... Gossamer Gear... Gossamer Gear... Ultralight... Granite Gear Virga 2
Total Weight (ounces) 34.6 oz 30.5 oz 31.5 oz 24 oz 18.5 oz
Stripped Weight (ounces) 34.6 oz 30.5 oz 27.5 oz 23 oz 18.5 oz
Claimed Volume (liters) 38 L 60 L 40 L 54 L 50-58 L
Measured Main Pack Volume (liters) 24 L 48 L 38 L 45 L 41 L
Measured Volume Total (minus hip belt and shoulder strap pockets)(liters) 36 L 64 L 53 L 53 L 49 L
Measured Volume Stripped (minus hip belt, shoulder pockets, and removable lids)(ounces) 36 L 59 L 48 L 53 L 49 L
Average Weight-to-Volume Ratio (grams/Liter) 27.2 g/L 14 g/L 13.5 g/L 12.8 g/L 10 g/L
Carrying Comfort 15 pounds Good Great Great Great Good
Carrying Comfort 30 pounds Ok Great Great Poor Poor
Frame Type Simple Frame - T6 aluminum stays Foam pad/ removable stay Foam pad/removable stay Removable foam pad None (foam pad)
Fabric 70D Ironlite nylon 70 & 100 denier Robic nylon 70 & 100 denier robic nylon 210 Robic nylon, 400d Robic Bottom Panel Cordura
Main Pack Pockets 3 4 3 3 3
Hip Belt Pockets 2 2 2 Two none
Single Hip Belt Pocket Capacity 2 cliff bars 4 4 cliff bars 2 cliff bars N/a
Shoulder Strap Pockets No no No No None
Whistle on Sternum Strap Yes No Yes No None
Internal Hydration Sleeve Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Bag Sizes/Torso Lengths Available S/M, L/XL S,m,l S,m,l S,M,L,XL Long, short, regular
Mix and Match Hip Belt Sizes No S, m, l S, m, l S, M, L, XL No
Can Easily Strip Off Frame and Hip Belt No Good Good No No
BearVault BV500 Compatibility No Good Ok Ok Ok
Lid (aka Brain) Yes No Yes No No

Our Analysis and Test Results

Performance Comparison


The lightweight Hydra blowing in the breeze along the rim of the Verdon Gorge.
The lightweight Hydra blowing in the breeze along the rim of the Verdon Gorge.

Weight-to-Volume Ratio


Its measured weight places the Hydra 38 alongside packs like the Hyperlite Mountain Gear 3400 55 and, to an extent, the ULA Ohm 2.0. The Hydra weighs in at 34.6 ounces, with no change between the pack's total weight and its stripped weight.

We found the Hydra to have a fairly small capacity  for its weight  making it hard to imagine bringing it on longer trips.
We found the Hydra to have a fairly small capacity, for its weight, making it hard to imagine bringing it on longer trips.

Both the Hydra and The North Face Phantom 38 receive low scores in this metric because their weight is fairly high relative to their carrying capacity. This means that the weight-to-volume ratio is much higher than the average ultralight pack. That said, they are still relatively lightweight, so if capacity is not as much of a concern, these two packs will still provide a relatively lightweight carry.

Weight Bottom Line:
Total Weight with all modular components = 2 lb 2.6oz
Pack striped of components =2 lb 2.6oz
Lid = na

OGL Measured Volume Bottom Line:
Total Volume = 36 L
Main Bag = 24 L
Pockets = 8 L
Lid = 4 L

Load Carrying Comfort


The Hydra has a full aluminum frame, suspension system, and trampoline mesh back panel, making it fairly substantial in terms of support. The Dyno Lift System that makes up the suspension is easy to adjust and lifts the load high off your hips. What we didn't like about this set-up was the lack of versatility that comes with this intricate structure. We discovered the Hydra was uncomfortable with less than 20 pounds in it, as the suspension system and hip belt are overbuilt for lighter loads. The North Face Phantom 38 was much more adjustable and carried a wide range of loads comfortably.

The tension frame felt strange with loads under 20 pounds. The Hydra works better with a slightly heavier load  to engage the suspension system properly.
The tension frame felt strange with loads under 20 pounds. The Hydra works better with a slightly heavier load, to engage the suspension system properly.

Features


The Hydra 38 has a limited feature set that is reminiscent of the Osprey Exos 48. The Hydra has a large stuff pocket on the outside with two fine mesh water bottle pockets on each side; like the updated Exos, the Hydra's pockets are made of either a fine, durable mesh (the side pockets) or durable nylon (the rear stash pocket). The downside to these durable pockets is that they lack stretch. Many ultralight packs use a stretchy mesh material for these outer stow pockets, which greatly increases their overall carrying capacity. The Gossamer Mariposa and the Gossamer Gorilla both have this style pocket.

Shown here is the waist belt (and waist belt pockets) as well as the mesh side pockets that the Hydra features.
Shown here is the waist belt (and waist belt pockets) as well as the mesh side pockets that the Hydra features.

The Hydra also has two waist pockets, which are fairly small in capacity. The lid of the pack has a capacity of six liters and cannot be removed. These pockets are the main event in terms of features on this fairly simple pack.

Adaptability


The Hydra 38 lacks adaptability, as we found no way to slim down the pack from its original 34.6-ounce weight. The lid is a pain to remove, and we would not recommend attempting. The frame and waist belt are integrated into the overall design of the pack, making them impossible to remove. We found this to be a detraction from the pack since it limits the uses.

Unfortunately  the frame is very hard to remove  limiting the adjustability of this pack.
Unfortunately, the frame is very hard to remove, limiting the adjustability of this pack.

Durability


The Hydra impressed us during our three-month test period. This pack, though lighter than The North Face Phantom 38, is almost as durable. The construction of the Hydra is burlier, with its aluminum frame plus its reinforced shoulder straps and adjustment points. The nylon "beaver tail" pockets also add to the durability. Like the updated Exos, the Hydra gets points here because nylon outer pockets stand up to the wear and tear of the trail compared to their stretchy mesh counterparts.

The materials used in the construction of the Hydra are impressively durable  especially since the pack is so lightweight.
The materials used in the construction of the Hydra are impressively durable, especially since the pack is so lightweight.

Best Application


The Hydra is best used for overnights or weekend trips; it has a relatively small capacity, which means it's ideal for shorter trips or experienced packers. Since it doesn't adjust and is a bit ill-fitting when partially full, the Hydra only functions as a day pack if it has at least a 15-pound load in it.

The relatively small Hydra is a great overnight pack  with little room in the main pack for extra food or clothes.
The relatively small Hydra is a great overnight pack, with little room in the main pack for extra food or clothes.

Value


With a price tag of $170, the Hydra is a decently affordable option for a lightweight, small capacity pack. Comparable in design to the Osprey Exos 48, the Hydra is smaller and also a bit less expensive (the Exos costs $200 online). The Hydra and The North Face Phantom 38 both cost $170; after testing both packs side by side, we were pleased with their performance. The Phantom is more versatile in our view, increasing its value slightly over the Hydra.

Conclusion


The North Face Hydra 38 is a lightweight option for folks who are set on having a full-suspension pack without too much added bulk. The Hydra carries 20 to 30 pounds comfortably but lacks the adjustability that is typical of many ultralight packs. We felt that this detracted from the pack since it limited its use. With its reasonable price tag and durable design, the Hydra is a decent choice for those looking for a supportive, lightweight weekend pack.


Jane Jackson