The Triton Plus is not as fancy or powerful as many of the other stoves we tested, but it definitely gets the job done, and we genuinely enjoyed the cooking experience it provided.
The Triton performed well with detailed cooking and simmering.
Time to Boil
The Triton boiled a quart of 60-degree water in 4:45, which is a pretty decent time considering it only has 11,000 BTUs per burner. However, on a cooler breezier day with 50-degree water, this same task took 9:15. This was a larger time difference between the two tests than we saw with almost any other stove, even models without a windscreen and with lower BTUs. If boiling water is an important aspect of your camp kitchen experience, you may want to purchase a different stove or get a JetBoil Flash as a companion accessory.
With its small burners and lower BTU per burner, the Triton didn't fare as well as its competitors and ended up with one of the lowest scores for boiling time.
This is the place where the Triton struggles the most. With only 11,000 BTUs per burner, we expected some loss in performance under less-than-ideal circumstances, but perhaps not to the extent we experienced. During our box fan test where we set up a large fan 24 inches to the side of each stove and timed the boiling of a quart of water, the Triton finished with one of the slowest times at 15 minutes. For comparison, our fastest stove in the box fan test was the Camp Chef Everest at 3 minutes. Again, for your sleepy-eyed campmates that need coffee ASAP in the mornings, you may want to also have a JetBoil on hand — it'll save you time and fuel for sure.
The Triton didn't boil water very quickly, particularly when there was wind, but it did cook food very efficiently.
The Triton simmers quite well once you get the hang of it. The flame is a bit hard to see when it's turned down very low, so some attention is required to avoid accidentally turning it off. On top of that, the burner knob's full range is several full 360-degree rotations, but to turn it from low to off is only about a quarter turn. And despite the low BTUs on this stove, it does seem to cook quite fast so, again, some attention is required to find the right setting when you want to simmer. However, once we learned the nuances of the burner we had no problem with performance and were able to cook low and slow with no problem.
Ease of Set Up
This stove sets up just like any other compact tabletop model, with only a slight variation in the design of the windscreen. The wings slot into the side of the stove body in a way that allows you to change their angle — nice if you have an oversize pan that needs just a little more space. A small recess in the drip tray gives the propane adaptor a place to nest into so that it doesn't slide around inside the stove as much. The adaptor also screws into the stove body much more easily than with several of the other models we tested. All in all, it's a straightforward experience with no quirks or annoyances.
This stove has a small recess to nest the fuel attachment elbow and keep it from sliding around when carrying.
Ease of Care
Another simple and straightforward process. The cooking grate lifts out, exposing an easy-to-clean steel drip tray. The recess for the propane adaptor will undoubtedly collect food bits over time, but nothing substantial unless you have some sort of enormous spillover. We did notice after taking the Triton out for testing that it seemed to get beat up and dented faster than our other competitors, but not in any way that made us doubt the overall product integrity or performance.
The Triton cover got scratched and dented much easier than its competitors.
The Triton packs down to 21 x 12.5 x 4.5 inches. This is a couple of inches smaller than many of our other compact tabletop models which, to us, wasn't worth the smaller burners and lower BTUs. With the Everest you may have a couple more inches of stove to contend with, but you also get a large jump up in performance for not much more money. For the most compact two-burner in our test suite, be sure to check out our Top Pick for Portability, the foldable Jetboil Genesis Basecamp.
The Triton probably isn't the stove to choose if you regularly cook for groups larger than 3-4 people, as the stovetop space is a bit limited and it's not super powerful. While it is a reliable stove that performs well in almost all areas, if you camp a lot you may want to consider spending a little bit more and buying something that is more powerful and wind resistant — particularly if boiling water is an important part of your camp routine. You could pair this stove nicely with a JetBoil, but at that point, you've spent way more money than you would if you just bought a more powerful stove to begin with.
The Triton was the only stove tested with the ability to adjust the width of the wind guards, allowing us to use larger pans than we otherwise would have been able to.
The Triton is fairly priced for a solid camp stove. However, when you look at the fact that you can get a stove like the Everest with 18,000 more BTUs and 2.5 inches more cooktop space for just a bit more, then it makes less sense to choose this stove. We also reviewed the Coleman Classic, which won one of our Best Buy awards, and it costs less than the Triton. While it wasn't quite as high quality and doesn't offer an auto-ignition system, it's got a slightly larger cooking area and scored better in many of our tests.
The Triton Plus is a solid stove at a decent price. It simmers well, sets up and ignites with ease, and is simple to care for. As a stand-alone stove it's fine, but when stacked up against some of the other stoves we tested it fell a bit short. It has low BTUs, a smaller cooking area, and struggled with the wind. All-in-all it's a decent stove, but not our first choice.