The world's most in-depth and scientific reviews of gear

Best Backpacking Stove of 2021

Jessica and Andrea anxiously awaiting dinner. When it is on any kind o...
Photo: Jessica Haist
Tuesday January 19, 2021
  • Share this article:
Our Editors independently research, test, and rate the best products. We only make money if you purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Learn more

In the last 10 years we've tested 34 different models in an effort to find the best backpacking stove. In our latest review we examine 17 stoves. We've surveyed the stove market, bought the best models, and tested them side-by-side and in our lab. Our testing took place in a variety of settings, everything from sea level to 14,000 foot summits. From windy weekend backpacking trips to frigid expeditions on glaciers, we have the info to guide you toward the best fit, whether you're on a tight budget or money is no object.

Related: Best Camping Stove

Top 17 Product Ratings

Displaying 1 - 5 of 17
< Previous | Compare | Next >
 
Awards   Editors' Choice Award   
Price $69.95 at Backcountry
Compare at 2 sellers
$22.95 at Backcountry
Compare at 2 sellers
$64.95 at REI
Compare at 2 sellers
$50 List$130 List
Overall Score
75
48
75
68
67
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pros Works in the wind, great for simmering, best of the bestInexpensive, great for fancy cooking, good with big cookwareLightweight, works in the wind, great piezo lighter, very stable for small canister stoveLightweight, easy to use, good at simmering, piezo igniterEasy to use, inexpensive, fuel efficient
Cons Unreliable piezo igniterInefficient, not light, small valve controlNot the most fuel efficient, pot supports pack up separately from stoveA bit heavier and bit pricier than the competitionHeavy, bulky
Bottom Line A favorite for simmering that can also boil water in the breezeIt looks old-school, but impresses in heat control and ability to handle large cookware at an awesome priceThis lightweight stove is easy to use and will boil water when it's breezyWe are impressed by this stove's ability to do everything with easeThis stove performs well in every way except weight and size
Rating Categories MSR PocketRocket Deluxe Primus Classic Trail Soto Windmaster Snow Peak GigaPower 2.0 Camp Chef Stryker Multi-Fuel
Fuel Efficiency (25%)
7
3
6
6
8
Weight (25%)
8
5
8
8
4
Simmering Ability (20%)  
8
8
8
8
7
Ease Of Use (20%)
7
4
9
7
9
Boil Time (10%)
7
4
6
3
5
Specs MSR PocketRocket... Primus Classic Trail Soto Windmaster Snow Peak... Camp Chef Stryker...
Category Small Canister Small Canister Small Canister Small Canister Integrated Canister
Trail Weight 3.0 oz 6.7 oz 3.0 oz 3.0 oz 18.5 oz
Wind Boil Time (1 L, 2-4mph) 7:20 min:sec 15 min 7:24 min:sec 15 min 7:14 min:sec
Boil Time (1 liter) 3:39 min:sec 4:22 min:sec 4:42 min:sec 5:53 min:sec 5:38 min:sec
Packed Weight 3.5 oz 7.1 oz 3.5 oz 3.9 oz 27.2 oz
Dimensions (inches) 3.3 x 2.2 x 1.8 in 4.9 x 4.9 x 2.2 in 4.7 x 3.9 x 3.6 in 4.2 x 2.6 in 4.25 x 8 in
Fuel Type Isobutane Isobutane Isobutane Isobutane Isobutane, propane
Additional items included Stuff sack Stuff sack Stuff sack, pot support Plastic case 1.5L pot, 2 canister stands, stuff sack, propane adapter
Piezo Igniter Yes No Yes Yes Yes

Best Overall Backpacking Stove


Soto Windmaster


75
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Fuel Efficiency - 25% 6
  • Weight - 25% 8
  • Simmering Ability - 20% 8
  • Ease Of Use - 20% 9
  • Boil Time - 10% 6
Trail Weight: 3.0 oz | Wind Boil Time: 7 min 24 sec
Lightweight
Wind resistant
Simmers well
Great pot supports
Convenient and easy to use
Only decent fuel efficiency
Average boil time

Just when we thought that there wasn't much room left for innovation with small canister stoves, the Soto Windmaster came along. Small canister stoves are supposed to be light and easy to use, and this one is. The piezo igniter works almost every time, something we've learned not to assume with all auto-ignitors. The 4-flex pot supports are also really generous — 2-liter pots won't threaten this stove's stability. What makes the Windmaster a standout is its wind resistance. In an 8-10 mph breeze, this thing not only stays lit, but it can even boil water!

We had a few small quibbles with this stove. It wasn't as fast to boil as some of the competition. More importantly, it's not quite as fuel-efficient. We were also challenged to pack the burner, pot supports, and a fuel can into our smaller cookware. That being said, we found that a small price to pay for the pot supports. For most backpackers, most of the time, we think this is the best stove out there.

Read review: Soto Windmaster

Best on a Tight Budget


BRS-3000T


BRS-3000T
Best Buy Award

$16.95
at Amazon
See It

63
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Fuel Efficiency - 25% 4
  • Weight - 25% 10
  • Simmering Ability - 20% 7
  • Ease Of Use - 20% 5
  • Boil Time - 10% 4
Trail Weight: 0.9 oz | Wind Boil Time: 15 min
Super lightweight and easy to use
Cheap!
Stable for the size
Tiny packed size
Inconsistent performance in the cold, wind, and higher elevations
Tiny burner head

We didn't expect much from the BRS 3000T, given its super low price. We also didn't realize how small it would be. This thing is tiny! It can fit comfortably in any ultra-light hiker's 375ml titanium cup. Despite the diminutive size, this stove sports a wire control valve that's easy to use and provides nice flame control at lower output. We were also pleased with the sturdy feel of the pot supports. They held a 1.5-L aluminum pot with a liter of water in it with no problems.

A number of consumer reviews mention problems with those supports melting. We have yet to experience those issues, but quality control sometimes falls by the wayside when a product is remarkably inexpensive. Despite the good flame control when turned down, the burner head of the BRS is tiny, making it easy to scorch some foods if you get lazy with the stirring. This stove also lacks a piezo igniter. For ultralight solo weekend (or long weekend) backpacking trips, this little stove can save weight and cash.

Read review: BRS-3000T

Best Integrated Canister Stove


JetBoil MiniMo


JetBoil MiniMo
Top Pick Award

$149.95
at Backcountry
See It

74
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Fuel Efficiency - 25% 8
  • Weight - 25% 7
  • Simmering Ability - 20% 6
  • Ease Of Use - 20% 8
  • Boil Time - 10% 8
Trail Weight: 12.2 oz | Wind Boil Time: 5 min 16 sec
Excellent fuel efficiency
Good boil time
Piezo ignition
Pot and burner mate well
Diminished wind performance
So-so at simmering

The JetBoil MiniMo is the top-performing integrated canister stove from the company that invented the category. JetBoil stoves have always included a confidence-inspiring burner head and pot attachment, and that's true here. In the past, the piezoelectric igniters on the stoves were a known failure point. On this model, however, our testers used the igniter hundreds of times with no issues. The big advancement over previous models is the burner head. The MiniMo scored well in boil times and fuel efficiency. Amongst integrated canister stoves, it's the best at simmering. Combine this with its unique short and squat pot and voile — you can consider cooking real food.

The MiniMo stays lit and boils water at wind speeds that would have most backpackers hiding in their tents. However, our testers know from experience that gustier winds will blow the stove out. After they're on, the MSR Reactor and Windburner stay on regardless of wind speed. The latest version of the Jetboil Flash, with its color-changing heat indicator and less messy pour, is giving the MiniMo a run for its money. Nevertheless, for backpackers dreaming about alpine or big wall ascents (and who have practice keeping the stove out of the wind), we think the MiniMo is an excellent choice.

Read review: JetBoil MiniMo

Best for Liquid Fuel


MSR Whisperlite Universal


MSR Whisperlite Universal
Top Pick Award

$140 List
List Price
See It

42
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Fuel Efficiency - 25% 4
  • Weight - 25% 3
  • Simmering Ability - 20% 5
  • Ease Of Use - 20% 4
  • Boil Time - 10% 6
Trail Weight: 11.6 oz | Wind Boil Time: 7 min 2 sec
Relatively simple
Durable
Versatile
Field repairable
Heavy
Hard to simmer

The MSR Whisperlite Universal takes the original gangster of the liquid fuel stove world and updates it for modern wilderness travelers. It is everything we expected from its predecessors: relatively simple (for this kind of stove), durable, and field repairable. Most users can expect this thing to last forever. It can also burn almost any type of fuel, including common canisters. With many North American backpackers moving away from liquid fuel stoves, we think multi-fuel versatility is becoming more important in this category.

Scores for fuel efficiency are unexceptional for the Universal. Simmering is also a challenge, but preparing tricky meals with liquid fuel is still possible with patience, savvy, and an understanding of how the stove works. While canister stoves are rightfully the go-to for most backpacking trips, the Whisperlite Universal is our top pick for any extended adventure that involves crossing international borders or melting snow for a group.

Read review: MSR Whisperlite Universal


Why You Should Trust Us


Jessica Haist and Ian McEleney are backcountry experts. Jessica has dedicated her life to adventure education. She is a staff trainer for Outward Bound California, where cooking for groups in the backcountry happens every day. Ian is an AMGA-certified Alpine Guide. He and his clients climb routes and peaks throughout the country. Together these two cook meals outdoors more than 150 nights per year.

We tested these stoves in the field and the "lab." For months in the mountains, the woods, and the desert, we used them daily for all of our cooking needs. We also conducted controlled tests to compare boil times, fuel efficiency, and performance under consistent wind speeds. We scored them in five categories: fuel efficiency, weight, simmering ability, time to boil, and ease of use.

Related: How We Tested Backpacking Stoves

Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge

Analysis and Test Results


We tested small canister stoves, integrated canister stoves, and liquid fuel stoves. The design that's best for you will depend on your needs. There is a stove for everyone, but first, you should decide on what you prioritize: weight and bulk, fuel efficiency, cooking ability, or all of the above? Read on to learn which stoves excelled in each of these areas.

Related: Buying Advice for Backpacking Stoves

Different flame sizes and shapes on small canister stoves. Which one...
Different flame sizes and shapes on small canister stoves. Which one do you think throws the most heat?
Photo: Ian McEleney

Value


A common misconception is to assume that spending more will get you a better stove. In reality, that's not always the case. The cheapest stove in our test, The BRS-3000T, ended up with a middle-of-the-pack score and performed well enough to meet the needs of the occasional backpacker. The Jeboil Flash is an excellent value for an integrated canister stove, and the MSR Whisperlite is the best value for backpackers who need a liquid fuel stove.


Fuel Efficiency


Fuel efficiency is a tricky category to evaluate because it's influenced by many variables. Our testers know from experience that running out of fuel at the wrong time can suck the fun right out of a trip. Backpackers should consider any fuel efficiency numbers mere suggestions both in pre-trip planning and when out on the trail. We tested fuel efficiency on our own with standardized boil time tests (including boil time in the wind) but also took the manufacturer's word for it on certain specifications like max burn times.

We measured two different boil times, which both involved bringing one liter of water to a rolling boil. The first boil time was indoors with zero wind using a full 4-ounce MSR ISOPro fuel canister (or an 11-ounce fuel bottle for the liquid fuel models). For the second test, we placed the stove with the same fuel can or bottle in front of a box fan blowing at 3 mph, as measured with a pocket anemometer. We averaged these two numbers for the final boiling time score. Readers should note that, due to pot capacities, some stoves were tested with less than a full liter of water.


Fuel efficiency in a backpacking stove is essential for many reasons; the main one being that you don't want to be left high and dry by running out of fuel. Fuel efficiency is also an important consideration for obvious environmental reasons, as well as weight savings. If you're an ounce counter, as many prudent backpackers are, having a fuel-efficient stove can cut down on the weight of fuel that you need to carry. If you can calculate how much fuel your stove needs, you may be able to leave an extra canister at home or bring a smaller canister and save some weight.

Integrated canister stoves steaming away: The MSR Reactor and...
Integrated canister stoves steaming away: The MSR Reactor and WindBurner, and the Jetboil MiniMo and Flash.
Photo: Ian McEleney

The overall most fuel-efficient stoves we tested are the Jetboil Flash and the Primus Lite+ because of their integrated heat exchange systems and insulated pots. The least efficient stoves are the Primus Classic Trail and MSR Windpro 2. Like cars built for fast and furious street racing, these models have impressive power outputs but guzzle down the gas.

Canister Fuel Efficiency Improvement Tips
  • When your canister gets too cold, performance and fuel-efficiency suffer. Consider sleeping with a canister in your sleeping bag or at least put it in your jacket and warm it up before use.
  • Let food soak. Put in your food when you turn the stove on and then let it soak when it reaches a near boil.
  • Turn the stove down a half turn — it will only take a little longer for water to boil but can save lots of fuel
  • Avoid a full boil. A near boil is good enough for most cooking and drinks.
  • Don't light the stove until there is something in the pot and it's on top of the burner.

Some of the small canister stoves had severe problems in the wind, and this affected their fuel efficiency. Notable exceptions to this are the MSR PocketRocket Deluxe and the Soto Windmaster. These two stoves feature burner heads that shield the flames.

Canister stove manufacturers advise against a windscreen that encloses the burner and fuel can, as this could potentially heat the canister to a dangerous level and cause an explosion. The Windpro is an exception to this. Its remote canister design separates the burner from the fuel like a liquid fuel stove, so it's okay to use a windscreen.

Winds were gusting to 40mph this day when we tested the MSR...
Winds were gusting to 40mph this day when we tested the MSR WindBurner and Reactor side by side. Both burners will blow out easily if the pots are removed in these kind of winds, but once the pots are attached they are virtually windproof.
Photo: Jessica Haist

Liquid fuel stoves are generally more fuel-efficient because they come with windscreens to shield breezes that focus the heat on the pot. Flexible aluminum windscreens are also sold separately. The added weight (a few ounces) is well worth it.

Weight


Like a backpacking tent, each stove received two scores when it came to weight. To determine the "packed weight, we weighed each stove with all of the things that came with it: stuff sacks or cases, accessory cups, and maintenance doodads. We also weighed each stove at its bare-bones "trail" weight. This excluded packaging or accessories and kept only the minimum of what was needed to cook or boil water. The BRS 3000T excelled in this metric, at an unreal 0.9-ounce trail weight and a tiny packed size.


Most canister stoves we tested weigh 4 ounces or less, lighter than your phone. We found weight to be less of a factor when deciding between them than with other stove types because they're all so close in weight. It's also worth considering whether the pot is included or not; all of the integrated canister stoves come with a pot and have a predictably higher trail and packed weight. If you are comparing an integrated canister stove with a small canister stove, remember that cookware should be included for the comparison.

Canister Weight
The nominal description of canister size (4, 8, or 16 ounces) describes the volume of the can, not the weight of the fuel and the can together. That number is always more. A four-ounce fuel can weighs in around 7.4 ounces when full.

The surprisingly small BRS (and its stuff sack).
The surprisingly small BRS (and its stuff sack).
Photo: Ian McEleney

Most of the integrated canister stoves have multiple compatible pots available for purchase. This can skew their weights and should be noted by readers considering these models. Jetboil makes pots for its stove systems in several sizes starting with 0.5 L; MSR only makes them in 1 L and up. The Camp Chef Stryker is only available with the 1.5 L pot that it comes with. The Jetboil Zip comes with a 0.75-L pot, which helped make it the lightest integrated canister model we tested.

The Zip with lid, burner, and pot. This is the lightest integrated...
The Zip with lid, burner, and pot. This is the lightest integrated stove in our test bunch, but the volume of the integrated pot is only 0.75 L, compared to the standard 1 to 1.5 L volume of most other integrated pots in our test bunch. For solo or two-person use, 0.75 L is usually enough.
Photo: Ian McEleney, Jetboil Zip

We also took size and packability into account in this category. Being able to pack stove, fuel, and a lighter inside your pot can help you squeeze into a smaller (and thus probably lighter) backpack. We looked at how little each burner got and how well it nested into a pot. Again, the BRS shined here; we could fit it and a 4-ounce fuel canister into our 500-mL pot.

A 4-ounce fuel can, lighter, pot grip, WindMaster burner, and pot...
A 4-ounce fuel can, lighter, pot grip, WindMaster burner, and pot support fit snugly in this 1-liter pot.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Simmering Ability


Our testing team believes this is an important metric. Sometimes we're in a hurry and will eat whatever freeze-dried concoction we have leftover from our last trip, no matter how unidentifiable. However, much of the time, we want to eat actual food, and we think that doing so improves our experience in the backcountry. A stove that can simmer well can handle pancakes, a fresh-caught golden trout, or maybe even a steak that's been thawing (double bagged!) in our pack on the hike in.


We looked for stoves that had good control valve sensitivity, particularly at the low end. A broad burner head, or the built-in heat exchangers on integrated canister stoves, can help distribute the heat more evenly around the bottom of a pot. Narrow burner heads and focused flames often lead to scorched oatmeal in the center and a cold mess around the edges. We also checked to see how low each stove could be turned down before sputtering out. The Soto WindMaster, PocketRocket Deluxe, Classic Trail, and GigaPower 2.0 are champs here. Their control wires give just the right amount of resistance, which let us dial in the flame and not carbonize our oatmeal.

Conducting the classic oatmeal test with the PocketRocket and a...
Conducting the classic oatmeal test with the PocketRocket and a titanium pot.
Photo: Jessica Haist

Our other small canister stoves also performed well. Unless you want your dinner cajun style and are prepared to stir fast and continuously, don't get a rager of an integrated canister stove like the Reactor or Flash for cooking. Interestingly, the Camp Chef Stryker performed better than the other integrated canister models in this metric.

Liquid fuel stoves often require some know-how to achieve a good simmer. The Dragonfly is designed for simpler simmering. Though it simmers more easily than its brethren, sautéing is still not as simple as with the small canister stoves.

We made this delicious and impressive pot-pie with the MSR...
We made this delicious and impressive pot-pie with the MSR Dragonfly, a testament to its versatility.
Photo: Ian Nicholson

Ease Of Use


After a long day on the trail, the last thing anyone wants to do is struggle to make dinner. Backpacking stoves should be intuitive and easy to operate.


No surprise, if a backpacking stove comes with a lot of small parts and accessories, they will be easy to lose. We also examined the controls on each model to see if they were easy to access and operate. The large wire knobs that are becoming the standard, like on the GigaPower 2.0, shine here. The tiny knobs on the Primus Classic and Lite+ seem dated in contrast.

The biggest and smallest integrated canister stoves.
The biggest and smallest integrated canister stoves.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Piezoelectric lighters have become quite reliable, and we think they should be a standard feature. Our testing team always goes into the backcountry with a lighter (or three), but with this feature, you don't have to search for it when what you really want to be doing is drinking coffee. MSR has added a piezo to the PocketRocket line on the Deluxe. Our testers would love to see the Reactor and WindBurner also sprout them. Over half of the small and integrated canister stoves in our review sport a piezo, though they didn't all offer the same reliability in our tests. We were pleased that the Soto WindMaster and Jetboil MiniMo fired up consistently by clicking the auto-ignitor. The PocketRocket Deluxe didn't give us this same consistency.

The very reliable piezo ignitor and easy-to-use wire fuel control...
The very reliable piezo ignitor and easy-to-use wire fuel control knob of the WindMaster.
Photo: Ian McEleney

The integrated canister stoves score well for stability because the burner and pot are designed to interlock, but they are quite tall and can be easy to knock over when full. All of the manufacturers try to address this problem by including canister stands, but we did not bring these along most times because they add weight and don't change the fundamental center-of-gravity issue. Small canister stoves are also tall once screwed onto a canister and have smallish pot supports. One standout here is the WindMaster; its 4Flex pot supports are long and noticeably more stable than most of its competition.

The Windpro&#039;s solid pot supports handle big cookware with ease.
The Windpro's solid pot supports handle big cookware with ease.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Lower and broader designs give more stability and allow for a wider array of cookware, and therefore meals. Liquid fuel models are the most stable because they are low to the ground and have wide stove legs that act as stable platforms. The MSR Dragonfly is the most stable, in part due to its giant pot supports. The Windpro 2 looks more like a liquid fuel stove, and it's about as stable as one.

We like taking the MiniMo on fast and light backpacking trips...
We like taking the MiniMo on fast and light backpacking trips, especially when using the stove for more than one person. Seen here with the Tarptent Double Rainbow.
Photo: Jessica Haist

Boil Time


Though stove manufacturers like to make a big deal out of boil times, most backpackers will not notice if their stove is a minute or two slower — only if it's 8 - 10 minutes slower. Boil time is also a complicated specification, with many contributing variables. We do not claim to be scientists, though we have tried to make our tests as objective as possible, controlling the environment and other variables to create a fair playing field. We did our testing in a garage at 8000 feet, where the ambient temperature was approximately 46 degrees Fahrenheit, and the water started at 43 degrees. The boiling point of water at 8000 feet is 197 F. We tested the time it took for one liter of water to reach a rolling boil with each of the stoves. All of the fuel bottles were full, and the canisters used were identical.


Be aware that different manufacturers use different amounts of water in their boil tests and are often testing them in a lab at sea level with an ambient air temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit. So the specs you see on a product's website may not be very applicable to the real-world situations on many backpacking trips.

The integrated pot that comes with the Primus Lite+ and Jetboil Zip have a smaller volume, which prevented us from testing them with a full liter. We tested the boiling time of the Lite+ using only 0.5 liters of water (making its time seem much faster than it likely would have otherwise) and the Zip with 0.75 liters.

Liquid fuel stoves take longer to boil water because they must be primed first. To keep our comparisons fair, we started the clock after priming. We found it took anywhere from 36 seconds to 1 minute 30 seconds to prime these stoves. We think user results for priming times will vary so widely that we did not bother to publish them. Boil times after priming were in the 6-8 minute range, the fastest being the MSR Universal at 6 minutes 44 seconds. We think that boil times for these stoves are less critical because their other functions (including their versatility) are more important than speed.

The MSR Reactor is great for fast and light alpine missions and...
The MSR Reactor is great for fast and light alpine missions and boils water fast.
Photo: Ian McEleney

While our testing team is not usually impressed with boil times, numbers at either end of the range did catch our attention. The PocketRocket Deluxe dominated this metric — when there was no wind — with a time of 3 minutes and 39 seconds. The MSR Reactor, and Jetboil MiniMo and Flash were close behind, practically tied at just a hair over 4 minutes.

The BRS in our boil test. The fan is out of view to the left...
The BRS in our boil test. The fan is out of view to the left, blowing 2 - 4 mph.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Wind plays a big part in boil times. Since it's not likely you'll have windless conditions on your next backpacking trip, we also tested these stoves in a 2-4 mph wind (provided by a fan operating at the same speed for consistency's sake). Some models were unable to boil water in these conditions, but most continued to perform reasonably well. Models that weren't able to cook in front of the fan are indicated as "15 min" because, after 15 minutes, we shut them off.


Canister stoves usually do not come with windscreens, and manufacturers often warn against using them in their instructions. The exception to this is the Windpro 2. Its design separates the burner from the can, so using a windscreen that fully encloses the flames poses minimal risk. Despite this, it saw a boil time increase by about 20% in front of the fan. Several small canister stoves also worked in the wind. Both the WindMaster and the PocketRocket Deluxe were able to boil water in our fan test.

The integrated canister stoves fared much better. As we expected, the Reactor and WindBurner were only slightly affected by the wind. It should be noted, however, that they can be difficult to light in the wind. The MiniMo and Lite+ surprised us by also doing well in this moderate breeze (although these stoves struggle in stronger wind gusts that tend to extinguish their flames). If a speedy time to boil is essential for your backcountry experience, consider one of the higher scorers here. Our backcountry experts don't recommend making this metric the sole source for your decision-making, though stove marketing and advertisements will try to convince you otherwise.

The Windpro 2 performs better in the wind than any small canister...
The Windpro 2 performs better in the wind than any small canister stove, just make sure the windscreen is wrapped snugly around your cookware.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Conclusion


While there is no single backpacking stove for every application or budget, the stove selection above can take the backcountry enthusiast from a weekend for two on the Appalachian Trail, to a week on the Colorado Plateau with a group of friends, to the high peaks of the Alaska Range. Most of our testers and friends agree that food tastes better in the outdoors, especially when you do it right. We hope you find the right stove for your needs that leads you to many happy, tasty meals in the backcountry.

Ian McEleney & Jessica Haist