Reviews You Can Rely On

Best Backpacking Stove of 2021

We put backpacking stoves head-to-head from brands like Soto, Jetboil, MSR, and others to find the best options for your backcountry excursions
Photo: Jessica Haist
Monday October 11, 2021
  • Share this article:
Our Editors independently research, test, and rate the best products. We only make money if you purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Learn more

Over the last 11 years, we've tested over 30 unique backpacking stoves in our quest to find the best, with the top 19 in this review. We've surveyed the stove market, purchased the best burners, and tested them side-by-side. We measured performance specs in controlled conditions then took the stoves out into the real world. We brought these stoves on all sorts of trips, everything from deserts to high altitude peaks and warm weekend getaways to chilly glacier expeditions. Below you'll find the information to help you figure out which stove is right for the backpacking you do.

Related: Best Camping Stove of 2021

Top 19 Product Ratings

Displaying 1 - 5 of 19
< Previous | Compare | Next >
 
Awards Editors' Choice Award  Top Pick Award   
Price $64.95 at REI
Compare at 2 sellers
Check Price at Backcountry
Compare at 2 sellers
Check Price at Backcountry
Compare at 3 sellers
$65.97 at Backcountry
Compare at 3 sellers
$49.95 at REI
Overall Score Sort Icon
75
75
69
68
64
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pros Lightweight, works in the wind, great piezo lighter, very stable for small canister stoveWorks in the wind, great for simmering, best of the bestLight, fairly fuel efficient, piezoelectric lighter, can simmerCompact, light, fast boil time, stable, insulated potLight, easy to use, good at simmering, piezo igniter
Cons Not the most fuel efficient, pot supports pack up separately from stoveUnreliable piezo igniterNot windproofSmall pot size, not versatileA bit slower than the competition
Bottom Line Our favorite small canister stove, providing the best performance for most backpackersThis simmering champ can also perform in the windA great system for backpackers and alpine climbers relying on dehydrated, simple mealsThis basic model still has all the frills, and is a great value if you want to boil water immediatelyThis stove boils a bit slower but does everything else well
Rating Categories Soto Windmaster MSR PocketRocket De... JetBoil MiniMo Jetboil Flash Snow Peak GigaPower...
Fuel Efficiency (25%)
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
6.0
Weight (25%)
8.0
8.0
6.0
6.0
8.0
Simmering Ability (20%)
8.0
8.0
5.0
3.0
6.0
Ease Of Use (20%)
9.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
7.0
Boil Time (10%)
6.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
3.0
Specs Soto Windmaster MSR PocketRocket De... JetBoil MiniMo Jetboil Flash Snow Peak GigaPower...
Category Small Canister Small Canister Integrated Canister Integrated Canister Small Canister
Trail Weight 3.0 oz 3.0 oz 12.2 oz 12.3 oz 3.0 oz
Wind Boil Time (1 L, 2-4mph) 7:24 min:sec 7:20 min:sec 5:09 min:sec 5:18 min:sec 15 min
Boil Time (1 liter) 4:42 min:sec 3:39 min:sec 4:09 min:sec 4:10 min:sec 5:53 min:sec
Packed Weight 3.5 oz 3.5 oz 15.2 oz 15.7 oz 3.9 oz
Dimensions (inches) 4.7 x 3.9 x 3.6 in 3.3 x 2.2 x 1.8 in 5 x 6 in 4.1 x 7.1 in 4.2 x 2.6 in
Fuel Type Isobutane Isobutane Isobutane Isobutane Isobutane
Additional items included Stuff sack, pot support Stuff sack 1L pot, canister stand, plastic cup, stuff sack for burner 1L pot, canister stand, plastic cup Plastic case
Piezo Igniter Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


Best Overall Backpacking Stove


Soto Windmaster


75
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Fuel Efficiency 6
  • Weight 8
  • Simmering Ability 8
  • Ease Of Use 9
  • Boil Time 6
Trail Weight: 3.0 oz | Wind Boil Time: 7 min 24 sec
Lightweight
Wind resistant
Simmers well
Great pot supports
Convenient and easy to use
Only decent fuel efficiency
Average boil time

When we first fired up the Soto Windmaster, we expected standard small canister stove performance, but we were pleasantly surprised from the very first press of the piezoelectric button. The igniter works almost every time, a rarity among auto-igniters. The 4-flex pot supports are also really generous — 2-liter pots won't threaten this stove's stability. However, what makes the Windmaster a true standout is its wind resistance. In an 8-10 mph breeze, this thing not only stays lit, but it can even boil water.

We had some minor gripes with this stove. It's not the fastest we reviewed, nor is it as fuel-efficient as some of the gas-sipping competition. Packing the generous pot supports, burner, and a fuel canister into our small tester pot was also sometimes a challenge. That said, we found this a small price to pay for the pot supports. Bottom line, we think this is the best stove for most backpackers most of the time.

Read review: Soto Windmaster

Best on a Tight Budget


BRS-3000T


63
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Fuel Efficiency 4
  • Weight 10
  • Simmering Ability 7
  • Ease Of Use 5
  • Boil Time 4
Trail Weight: 0.9 oz | Wind Boil Time: 15 min
Incredibly lightweight and easy to use
Very affordable
Stable for the size
Tiny packed size
Inconsistent performance in the cold, wind, and higher elevations
Tiny burner head

Our initial expectations of the BRS-300T were tuned to its low price. Straight out of the box, we were shocked by its size — this is a tiny stove. It can fit comfortably in any ultra-light hiker's 375ml titanium cup. Despite the diminutive size, this stove sports a wire valve that's easy to use and provides nice low-end flame control. The pot supports are sturdier than they appear — they held a 1.5L aluminum pot with a liter of water in it with no problems.

A number of consumer reviews mention problems with those supports melting. We have yet to experience this issue, but high-end quality control can't be expected when a product is significantly less expensive than the competition. Though the flame control is good, the burner head of the BRS is tiny, making it easy to scorch rice or refried beans if you get lazy while stirring. This stove also lacks a piezo igniter. Nevertheless, for ultralight solo backpacking trips, this little stove will save weight, space, and cash.

Read review: BRS-3000T

Best Integrated Canister Stove


JetBoil MiniMo


69
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Fuel Efficiency 8
  • Weight 6
  • Simmering Ability 5
  • Ease Of Use 8
  • Boil Time 8
Trail Weight: 12.2 oz | Wind Boil Time: 5 min 16 sec
Excellent fuel efficiency
Good boil time
Piezo ignition
Pot and burner mate well
Diminished wind performance
So-so at simmering

The Jetboil MiniMo is our favorite integrated canister stove. Jetboil stoves have always included a confidence-inspiring burner to pot connection, and that's true here. Previously, piezoelectric igniters were a known failure point. On this model, however, our testers used the igniter hundreds of times with no issues. The big advancement with this model is the burner head. The "Mo" burner put out good boil times and fuel efficiency. Among the integrated canister stoves in our test, it's the best at simmering. Combine this with its unique short and squat pot and voila — you can consider cooking real food.

The MiniMo stays lit and boils water at wind speeds that would have most backpackers hiding in their tents. However, our testers know from experience that gustier winds will definitely blow the stove out. Nevertheless, hikers and backpackers who also have alpine climbing or big wall plans (and who have practice protecting a stove from the wind) would do well to consider the MiniMo.

Read review: Jetboil MiniMo

Best for Liquid Fuel


MSR Whisperlite Universal


42
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Fuel Efficiency 4
  • Weight 3
  • Simmering Ability 5
  • Ease Of Use 4
  • Boil Time 6
Trail Weight: 11.6 oz | Wind Boil Time: 7 min 2 sec
Relatively simple
Durable
Versatile
Field repairable
Heavy
Hard to simmer

The MSR Whisperlite Universal takes the classic Whisperlite of liquid fuel fame and updates it for the modern wilderness traveler. Liquid fuel stoves are known for field repairability and longevity, and the Universal ticks those boxes. In addition to white gas, this rig can run on canisters and most other types of fuel. Most American backpackers are shifting to canister stoves, and rightly so. That makes multi-fuel versatility even more important for liquid fuel stoves.

Preparing anything more than simple meals still requires practice and savvy when running the Universal on liquid fuels. Fuel efficiency and boil times are nothing special for this stove. Still, for serious snow melting, backcountry trips involving groups, or crossing multiple international borders, the Whisperlite Universal is our first choice for a liquid fuel stove.

Read review: MSR Whisperlite Universal

Compare Products

select up to 5 products to compare
Score Product Price Our Take
75
$65
Editors' Choice Award
This lightweight stove is easy to use and will boil water when it's breezy
75
$70
A favorite for simmering that can also boil water in the breeze
69
$150
Top Pick Award
This is light, relatively fuel efficient and convenient stove
68
$110
This stove prepares dehydrated meals and coffee water super fast
64
$50
We are impressed by this stove's ability to do everything with ease
64
$85
Don't want to spend a lot on an integrated canister stove? See here
63
$17
Best Buy Award
A mini stove with a mini price
62
$115
This middle-of-the-road stove has some new good features and some old frustrating ones
60
$140
This stove performs well in every way except weight and size
59
$30
A bulky small canister stove that's good at simmering but doesn't have a piezoelectric start
55
$240
This one-trick pony is slowly being rendered obsolete by easier-to-use stoves
55
$150
Great fuel efficiency and wind performance in a not-so-user-friendly package
54
$60
This stove is light on weight and features
50
$80
This stove shines when things get chilly or you're running low on fuel, otherwise it's average
46
$25
Decent at simmering, not so great at everything else
42
$150
Top Pick Award
This uniquely versatile stove has all the features you love, plus one
40
$100
For extended backpacking trips and expeditions, this tried and true liquid fuel model still can't be beat
40
$150
Our favorite for cooking next level meals, not just noodles and sauce, but note its weight and loudness
40
$110
While this stove isn't a high performer, it does do certain things well

Why You Should Trust Us


Jessica Haist and Ian McEleney are backcountry experts. Jessica holds a Master's Degree in Adventure Education. Originally from Canada, she now resides in Mammoth Lakes, CA, amidst the Sierra Nevada. Ian is an AMGA-certified Alpine Guide. He and his clients climb routes and peaks throughout the country. Together these two cook meals outside (both simple and complex) more than 150 nights per year.

We tested these stoves in the "lab" and in the field. For months in the mountains, the woods, and the desert, we used them daily for all of our cooking needs to evaluate for ease of use and simmering ability. We also conducted tests in a controlled environment to score the stoves for fuel efficiency, boil time, and weight.

Related: How We Tested Backpacking Stoves

Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge

Analysis and Test Results


We tested small canister stoves, remote canister stoves, integrated canister stoves, and liquid fuel stoves. The type of stove that's best for you will depend on your specific needs. There's a stove for every backpacker, but first, you should decide on what you prioritize: weight and bulk, fuel efficiency, cooking ability, simple operation? Read on to learn which stoves excelled in each of these areas.

Related: Buying Advice for Backpacking Stoves

Which one is right for you? The BRS, Windmaster, and MiniMo (l - r).
Which one is right for you? The BRS, Windmaster, and MiniMo (l - r).
Photo: Ian McEleney

Value


A common misconception is to assume that spending more will get you a better stove. The fact is that's often just not the case. The cheapest stove in our test, The BRS-3000T, ended up with a middle-of-the-pack score and performed well enough to meet the needs of the occasional backpacker. The Jeboil Flash is an excellent value for an integrated canister stove and the Soto WindMaster and MSR PocketRocket Deluxe scored the highest while still costing less than the majority of other products in our review.


Fuel Efficiency


Fuel efficiency is an important metric, but it's tricky to evaluate because it's influenced by many variables. We know from experience that running out of fuel at the wrong time can ruin a trip. Backpackers should consider any fuel efficiency numbers as mere suggestions both in pre-trip planning and when out on the trail. Tests performed both by our team and manufacturers happen in a controlled setting that's very different from real-world backpacking.

We measured efficiency concurrently with boil time. Both boil time measurements involved bringing one liter of water to boil indoors. The first measurement was with zero wind using a full 4-ounce fuel canister (or an 11-ounce fuel bottle for the liquid fuel models). In the second test, we used the stove with the same fuel can or bottle in front of a box fan blowing about 3 mph, as measured with a pocket anemometer. After each boil, we weighed the can to figure out how much fuel was burned. We averaged these two numbers for the score. Due to pot capacities, some stoves were tested with less than a full liter of water.


Fuel efficiency is important for several reasons, the main one being that you don't want to run out of fuel! Fuel efficiency is also a consideration for environmental reasons and weight savings. If you're an ounce counter — as prudent backcountry travelers should be — having an efficient stove can cut down on the weight of fuel that you need to carry. By anticipating how much fuel your stove and cooking style requires, you may be able to leave an extra canister at home or bring a smaller canister and save weight and pack space.

A fuel-efficient stove means less time worrying and more time having...
A fuel-efficient stove means less time worrying and more time having fun with friends.
Photo: Jessica Haist

The overall most fuel-efficient stoves we tested are the Jetboil Flash and the Primus Lite+ because of their integrated heat exchange systems and insulated pots. The least efficient stoves are the Primus Classic Trail and MSR Windpro 2. Like cars tuned for fast and furious street racing, these models have impressive power outputs but burn through fuel fast.

Canister Fuel Efficiency Improvement Tips
  • When your canister gets cold, you lose performance and fuel efficiency. Consider sleeping with the canister in your sleeping bag, or at least put it in your jacket and warm it up before use.
  • Let food soak. Put food and water in the pot when you turn the stove on and then let it soak when it reaches a near boil.
  • Turn the stove down a half turn — it will only take slightly longer for water to boil.
  • Avoid a full boil. A near boil is good enough for most cooking and drinks.
  • Don't light the stove until there is something in the pot and it's on top of the burner.

Some of the small canister stoves had severe problems in the wind, and this affected their fuel efficiency. Notable exceptions to this are the MSR PocketRocket Deluxe and the Soto Windmaster. These two stoves feature burner heads that shield the flames.

Manufacturers advise against a windscreen that encloses the burner and fuel can, as this could potentially heat the canister to a dangerous level and cause an explosion. The Windpro and GSI Pinnacle 4 Season are the exception to this. Their remote canister design separates the burner from the fuel like a liquid fuel stove, so it's okay to use a windscreen.

Built-in heat exchangers on the MiniMo (left) and Reactor (right)...
Built-in heat exchangers on the MiniMo (left) and Reactor (right) boost fuel efficiency and cut boil times.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Like remote canister stoves, liquid fuel models come with flexible aluminum windscreens to shield breezes and focus the heat on the pot. These are also sold separately and can be found in titanium. The added weight (a few ounces) is well worth it.

Weight


In this review, we look at weight in two different ways. To determine the "packed" weight, we weighed each stove with all of the things that came with it: stuff sacks or cases, accessory cups, and maintenance doodads. We also weighed each stove at its bare-bones "trail" weight. This excluded packaging or accessories and kept only the minimum of what was needed to cook or boil water. The BRS 3000T excelled in this metric, at an unreal 0.9-ounce trail weight and a tiny packed size.


Most canister stoves we tested weigh 4 ounces or less, lighter than your phone. We found weight to be less of a factor when deciding between them than with other stove types because they're all so close in weight. It's also worth considering whether the pot is included or not; all of the integrated canister stoves come with a pot and have a predictably higher trail and packed weight. If you are comparing an integrated canister stove with a small canister stove, remember that your camping cookware should be included for the comparison!

Canister Weight
The nominal description of canister size (4, 8, or 16 ounces) describes the amount of fuel in the can, not the weight of the fuel and the can together. That number is always more. A four-ounce fuel can weighs around 7.4 ounces when full, an 8 ounce can weighs about 13.1 ounces.

The surprisingly small BRS (and its stuff sack).
The surprisingly small BRS (and its stuff sack).
Photo: Ian McEleney

Most integrated canister stoves have multiple compatible pots available for purchase. This can skew their weights and should be noted by readers considering these models. Jetboil makes pots for its stove systems in several sizes, starting with 0.5L; MSR makes them in 1L and up. The Camp Chef Stryker is only available with the 1.5L pot that it comes with. The Jetboil Zip comes with a 0.75L pot, which helped make it the lightest integrated canister model we tested.

The Zip with lid, burner, and pot. This is the lightest integrated...
The Zip with lid, burner, and pot. This is the lightest integrated stove in our test bunch, but the volume of the integrated pot is only 0.75 L, compared to the standard 1 to 1.5 L volume of most other integrated pots in our test bunch. For solo or two-person use, 0.75 L is usually enough.
Photo: Ian McEleney, Jetboil Zip

We also took size and packability into account in this category. Being able to pack the stove, fuel, and a lighter inside your pot can help you squeeze into a smaller (and thus probably lighter) backpack. We looked at how little each burner got and how well it nested into a pot. Again, the BRS crushed; we could fit it and a 4-ounce fuel canister into a 500mL pot.

A 4-ounce fuel can, lighter, pot grip, WindMaster burner, and pot...
A 4-ounce fuel can, lighter, pot grip, WindMaster burner, and pot support fit snugly in this 1-liter pot.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Simmering Ability


Our testing team believes this is an important metric. When we're in a hurry, we'll shovel down whatever freeze-dried food is leftover from our last trip. However, much of the time, we want to eat actual food, and we feel that doing so makes our time in the backcountry better. A stove that can simmer well can handle biscuits, a fresh-caught golden trout, or maybe even a steak that's been thawing (double bagged!) in our pack on the hike in.


We looked for stoves that had good control valve sensitivity, particularly at the low end. A broad burner head can help distribute the heat more evenly around the bottom of a pot. Narrow burner heads and focused flames often lead to scorched oatmeal in the center and a cold goop around the edges. We also checked to see how low each stove could be turned down before sputtering out. The Soto WindMaster, PocketRocket Deluxe, Primus Classic Trail, and GigaPower 2.0 are champs here. Their control wires give just the right amount of resistance, allowing us to dial in the flame and not carbonize dinner.

Cooking oatmeal is a good test of simmering ability.
Cooking oatmeal is a good test of simmering ability.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Unless you want your dinner cajun style and are prepared to stir fast and continuously, don't get a rager of an integrated canister stove for cooking. This type of stove is mostly made for boiling water quickly, not cooking rice slowly. Interestingly, the Camp Chef Stryker performed better than the other integrated canister models in this metric.

Liquid fuel stoves often require experience and skill to achieve a good simmer. Our testers don't want to practice using their backpacking stove in their free time at home, will you? This is another reason why we think that most backpackers will prefer small canister stoves over liquid fuel stoves.

Can you believe we made this delicious pot-pie with a backpacking...
Can you believe we made this delicious pot-pie with a backpacking stove!
Photo: Ian Nicholson

Ease Of Use


After a long day on the trail, the last thing anyone wants to do is struggle to make dinner. We think it's important that backpacking stoves are easy to operate. We like models that only require us to look at the manual the first time.


Our testers have discovered that if a backpacking stove comes with a bunch of small parts and accessories, the likelihood of losing them is high. We also examined the controls on each model to see if they were easy to access and operate. Large wire knobs, like on the Windmaster and MiniMo, are becoming the standard. The tiny knobs on other stoves seem dated in contrast.

The biggest and smallest integrated canister stoves.
The biggest and smallest integrated canister stoves.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Piezoelectric lighters have become quite reliable, and we think they should be a standard feature. Our testing team always goes into the backcountry with a lighter (or three), but with this feature, you won't be caught up looking for one when what you really want to be doing is drinking coffee. MSR has added a piezo to the PocketRocket line on the Deluxe, though its performance was inconsistent. We'd love to see the Reactor and WindBurner sprout them too. Over half of the small and integrated canister stoves in our review sport a piezo, though they didn't all offer the same reliability. We were pleased that the Soto WindMaster and Jetboil MiniMo fired up consistently by clicking the auto-igniter.

The business end of the piezo igniter on the Windmaster (left) is...
The business end of the piezo igniter on the Windmaster (left) is the small metal tab in the center of the burner. On the MiniMo (right) it's the small white post and wire in the burner.
Photo: Ian McEleney

The integrated canister stoves score well for stability because the burner and pot are designed to interlock, but they are quite tall and can be easy to knock over when full. All of the manufacturers try to address this problem by including canister stands, but we rarely bring these on trips because they add weight and don't change the fundamental center-of-gravity issue. Small canister stoves are also tall once screwed onto a canister and have smallish pot supports. One standout here is the WindMaster; its 4Flex pot supports are long and noticeably more stable than most of its competition.

The short and squat shape of the MiniMo pot makes eating right out...
The short and squat shape of the MiniMo pot makes eating right out of it pretty easy.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Lower and broader designs give more stability and allow for a wider array of cookware, and therefore meals. Liquid fuel models are more stable because they are low to the ground and have wide stove legs that act as stable platforms. The MSR Dragonfly is the most stable, in part due to its giant pot supports. The Windpro 2 looks more like a liquid fuel stove, and it's about as stable as one.

The Windpro&#039;s solid pot supports handle big cookware with ease.
The Windpro's solid pot supports handle big cookware with ease.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Boil Time


Though stove manufacturers like to make a big deal out of boil times, most backpackers will not notice if their stove is a minute or two slower — only if it's 8 - 10 minutes slower. Boil time is also a complicated specification, with many contributing variables. So we don't give it a ton of weight in our scoring.


We do not claim to be scientists, though we have tried to make our tests as objective, controlled, and repeatable as possible. We did our testing in a garage at 8000 feet (about 2430 meters), where the boiling point of water is 197 F (about 92 C). We tested the time it took for one liter of water to reach a rolling boil with each of the stoves. All of the fuel bottles were full, and the canisters used were identical.

Be aware that different manufacturers use different amounts of water in their boil tests and are often testing them in a lab at sea level. So the specs you see on a product's website may not be very applicable to what you find on your backpacking trips.

The integrated pot that comes with the Primus Lite+ and Jetboil Zip have smaller volumes, which prevented us from testing them with a full liter. We tested the boiling time of the Lite+ using only 0.5 liters of water (making its time seem much faster than it likely would have otherwise) and the Zip with 0.75 liters.

Liquid fuel stoves take longer to boil water because they must be primed first. To keep our comparisons fair, we started the clock after priming. We found it took anywhere from 36 seconds to 1 minute 30 seconds to prime these stoves. We think user results for priming times will vary so widely that we did not bother to publish them. Boil time after priming for the MSR Universal was 6 minutes 44 seconds. We think that boil times for liquid fuel stoves are even less important than for other types of stoves because their other functions (including their versatility) are more important than speed.

The Reactor is fast to boil, even in the wind.
The Reactor is fast to boil, even in the wind.
Photo: Jessica Haist

While our testing team is not usually impressed with boil times, numbers at either end of the range did catch our attention. The PocketRocket Deluxe dominated this metric — when there was no wind — with a time of 3 minutes and 39 seconds. The MSR Reactor, and Jetboil MiniMo and Flash were close behind, practically tied at just a hair over 4 minutes.

The BRS in our boil test. The fan is out of view to the left...
The BRS in our boil test. The fan is out of view to the left, blowing 2 - 4 mph.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Wind plays a big part in boil times. Since it's not likely you'll have windless conditions on your next backpacking trip, we also tested these stoves in a 2-4 mph wind provided by a fan. Some models were unable to boil water in these conditions, but most continued to perform reasonably well. Models that weren't able to boil in front of the fan are indicated as "15 min" because after 15 minutes, we shut them off to stop wasting fuel.


Canister stoves usually do not come with windscreens, and manufacturers warn against using them in their instructions. The exception to this are the Windpro 2 and GSI Pinnacle. Their remote canister design separates the burner from the can, so using a windscreen that fully encloses the flames poses minimal risk. Nevertheless, these stoves saw a boil time increase in front of the fan. Several small canister stoves also worked in the wind. Both the WindMaster and the PocketRocket Deluxe were able to boil water in our fan test.

The integrated canister stoves fared much better. As we expected, the Reactor and WindBurner were only slightly affected by the wind. It should be noted, however, that they can be difficult to light in the wind. The MiniMo and Lite+ surprised us by also doing well in this moderate breeze (although these stoves struggle in stronger wind gusts that tend to extinguish their flames). If a speedy time to boil is essential for your backcountry experience, consider one of the higher scorers here. Though stove marketing and advertisements will try to convince you otherwise, we don't recommend making this metric the sole source for your decision-making.

The Windpro 2 performs better in the wind than any small canister...
The Windpro 2 performs better in the wind than any small canister stove, just make sure the windscreen is wrapped snugly around your cookware.
Photo: Ian McEleney

Conclusion


While there is no single backpacking stove for every application or budget, the stove selection above can take the backcountry enthusiast from a weekend for two on the Appalachian Trail to a week on the Colorado Plateau with a group of friends, to the high peaks of the Alaska Range. Most of our testers and friends agree that food tastes better in the outdoors, especially when you do it right. We hope you find the right stove for your needs that leads you to many happy, tasty meals in the backcountry.

Ian McEleney & Jessica Haist