Crescent Moon Gold 10 Review

Crescent Moon is a relative newcomer to the snowshoe game. While they've been making snowshoes in Colorado since 1997, it is only in recent years that they've fully entered the national market. As a completely domestic company, from design to manufacturing, they appeal to consumers in a different way than others.

Performance Comparison

For open, deep-snow terrain, the Crescent Moon Backcountry is gold.

Photo: Jediah Porter

Flotation

In our review, a review for which the product selection largely focused on the all-around, the Gold 10 is among the larger snowshoes we tested. There are much larger snowshoes available, including Crescent Moon's super-sized Expedition 17 model, but among the all-around types, the Gold 10 is among the largest. It comes in with 256 OGL measured square inches of flotation. The shape puts the bulk of that surface area under the user's center of gravity, leaving the tails and tips narrower for better stride ergonomics. In short, the Crescent Moon tops our charts, for flotation. You won't find a better floating snowshoe that is also suitable for packed trails.

Traction

The Crescent Moon Backcountry snowshoe isn't the most grippy in our test. The only crampon points are those directly under the user's foot.

Photo: Jediah Porter

In order to achieve a great deal of surface area at a reasonable weight, Crescent Moon has equipped the Gold 10 snowshoes with minimal metal spiking, limited only to the binding/crampon area. The result is poorer-than-average traction on the firmest of snow conditions.

Stride Ergonomics

For snowshoes this large, the highly tapered shape makes for a stride and ergonomic experience that isn't as cumbersome as you might think. The tapered tail nestles next to the somewhat narrowed tip with each step, allowing almost a standard gait without stepping on yourself. The shock-absorbing strapped deck/binding interface allows for some little cushion.

As they are shoes designed for deep snow on mellow terrain, as evidenced by the minimal crampon and the larger size, the strapped deck/binding interface is the most comfortable. This allows for some spring in your step. Hinged interfaces, are more precise in technical terrain, but this isn't what the Gold 10 is optimized for.

Binding Comfort

The wide straps of the Gold 10 spread the force of retention over even the softest of winter footwear. As long as you use even slightly insulated shoes, which you'll want for winter use anyway, the straps won't cut or compress your foot or boots. The tension in the bindings is maintained by mechanical buckles. This makes for the most comfortable binding arrangement. Stretchy rubbery straps are slightly more secure, but make for a constricting fit when snugged enough for truly effective foot retention.

Ease of Use

The binding of the Crescent Moon is similar to that of the Atlas Montane. The forefoot is attached with this single-pull pair of straps, while the heel is secured with a ratcheting "snowboard binding" style strap.

Photo: Jediah Porter

With one handed on and off, the bindings of the Moon Gold 10 are among the easiest to us. We are 100 percent confident they will not ice up for you, and even the clumsiest of our testers were able to figure them out immediately.

Binding Security

We had no problems, as long as we stuck to gentler terrain, with the binding of the Gold 10. With the other design attributes taken into account, like the minimal cramponing and the strapped binding/deck interface, it is clear these aren't designed for technical terrain. In that case, the binding is as secure as is necessary.

In more technical terrain, the strapped interface and limited traction of the Crescent Moon suffers a bit. Careful balance and route selection can mitigate the adverse sides of the performance.

Photo: Jediah Porter

Value

The suggested retail price of the Moon Gold 10 is near the median of our entire test. It is above average, but below that of the most technical products in our test. For an American-made product that has inspired durability confidence in our testing team, it is certainly not a bad value.

Conclusion