Compared against our curated selection of excellent backcountry skis, the G3 Findr 102 struggles to find its place. It is light in construction but wide in dimensions. The result is appealing for human-powered free riding, but the downhill performance just doesn't stack up; the downhill performance demands good technique and attention. Our main award winners are more predictable and versatile in downhill performance.
G3 FINDr 102 Review
Compare prices at 2 resellers Pros: Reasonable weight for the size, durable construction attributes
Cons: Don’t grab firm snow, wobbly at speed
Compare to Similar Products
G3 FINDr 102
|Price||$499.97 at Amazon|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$948.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$698.95 at Backcountry||$470.91 at Amazon|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$699.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|Pros||Reasonable weight for the size, durable construction attributes||Light, well-balanced downhill performance||All around ski performance, hit what we consider to be the weight ‘sweet spot’||Light and versatile||Light, all around downhill performance|
|Cons||Don’t grab firm snow, wobbly at speed||Expensive, ski “short”||Grabby firm snow performance, expensive||Limited poor snow performance||Wobble in longer radius powder turns, slow down in tough snow|
|Bottom Line||Touring skis for soft snow and excellent skiers.||Excellent, all around backcountry skis for human powered adventures in nearly all conditions.||Excellent backcountry skis for the majority of applications.||All around choice for beginner to advanced backcountry skiers on a budget.||Light, big mountain skis for human powered skiing in all conditions; you won’t ski like a movie star, but you will ski it all efficiently and easy on your wallet.|
|Rating Categories||G3 FINDr 102||Kastle TX98||Volkl VTA 98||Fischer Hannibal||Blizzard Zero G 95|
|Stability At Speed (15%)|
|Firm Snow (20%)|
|Crud And Poor Snow (20%)|
|Specs||G3 FINDr 102||Kastle TX98||Volkl VTA 98||Fischer Hannibal||Blizzard Zero G 95|
|Weight Per Pair (lbs.)||7.1 lbs||6.2 lbs||6.4 lbs||6.2 lbs||5.9 lbs|
|Available Lengths||174,179, 184, 189||168, 178, 188||156, 163, 170, 177, 184||162, 169, 176, 183||164, 171, 178, 185|
|Weight Per Ski grams||1613g, 1603g, average: 1618g||1394g, 1400g, average: 1397g||1454g, 1449g, average: 1452g||1421g, 1388g, average: 1405g||1340g, 1347g, average: 1344g|
|Weight Per Pair grams||3216||2794||2903||2809||2687|
|Weight per Surface Area Ratio, g/cm^2||0.76||0.71||0.69||0.69||0.7|
|Construction Type||Sandwich||Sandwich Cap Hybrid||Sandwich Cap Hybrid||Sandwich Cap Hybrid||Sandwich|
|Core Material||Poplar and paulownia wood||Karuba Wood||Beech, poplar & paulownia||Paulownia wood with carbon stringers||Paulownia wood, Carbon Drive Technology|
|Rocker/Camber||Traditional camber, early rise||Low camber||Tip rocker||Tip rocker||Tip and tail rocker, camber underfoot|
Our Analysis and Test Results
The G3 Findr 102 is a mid-fat ski with relatively light construction and design. It has been available for many seasons now and has a number of favorable reviews elsewhere on the web. The result is an appealing human-powered "all around" ski that was found to have serious limitations for true all around use. If your season and runs includes true firm snow, these aren't a great choice for your "quiver of one". If you can stick to mainly soft snow, these can be a durable and reliable choice.
Stacked up against our select list of very excellent skis, the G3 Findr 102 suffers a little bit. Notably, the Black Diamond Helio 105 is similar in weight, dimensions, and price but is far more versatile. Our test team unanimously preferred the Helio to the otherwise similar Findr. That being said, compared to the entire market and the skis of just a few years ago, the Findr are excellent. For the price and availability, especially if you value supporting North American companies and manufacturing, they are worth your investigation.
In absolute terms, the Findr 102 is one of the heavier skis we reviewed. The pair we tested (in 184cm length) weighs 7.1 pounds for the pair. The catch is, we like lightweight skis in this review category. Backcountry skiing is human powered skiing, and human-powered skiing is better with light gear. We filter our selections by lighter gear; therefore, the Findr appears heavy in this review. Truth is, though, that as compared to older skis and alpine skis, these are ultralight. Also, as compared to other skis of this width, these are ultralight. In our "weight per surface area" calculations, the Findr does a lot better, by comparison.
When we calculate weight per surface area of all our skis, the Findr 102 is right in the mix with our Editors' Choice Kastle TX 98 and the Dynafit Beast 98. In absolute terms, though, the Findr is noticeably heavier than these other two. Of course, the Top Pick choices are way different than the Findr 102. The Black Crows Corvus Freebird is almost a full pound heavier than the Findr, while the Atomic Backland UL 78 is better than two pounds less. The range of available ski weights on the market is large. Among dedicated backcountry skis, the Findr 102 is roughly average.
Stability at Speed
Skiing is kinetic, and we like skis that can hang at speed. Touring skis cannot always do this very well. There is certainly a range of performance in this category. In wide open Teton Pass bowls, we were able to let 'em run and assess our confidence, in a variety of conditions. Similarly, on a rare in-bounds day our lead tester took 'em for a ride. Our experience with the Findr 102 is a cautionary tale for those that want to rely on construction attributes for their assessment of ski performance. "By the numbers", and given the materials used, we might expect the Findr 102 to be quite stable. For some reason, though, our experience was of a twitchy, grabby ski. We simply couldn't count on the stability of these like we could others. Even after days of testing (and associated familiarization), the Findr was not confidence inspiring to our test team.
Virtually all the skis we tested were more confidence inspiring at speed. Even the lighter, shorter, and less expensive Best Buy Blizzard Zero G was more stable underfoot. The super damp construction of the Editors' Choice Kastle TX 98 and the beefy mass of the Top Pick Black Crows Corvus beat the pants off the stability of the Findr.
These are skis for soft snow. If firm snow is anything more than a passing lark in your ski life, choose something else. On a rock-hard, cold day in the Tetons, we eagerly anticipated the return to the car, as the Findr 102 felt downright dangerous. Further testing, under other skiers, verified this experience. Even G3 hedges their bets when they describe the Findr. The first line of their catalog copy indicates that the Findr 102 is built to bridge "the gap between fat, floaty powder skis and super light mountaineering skis". They go on to both claim that the Findr 102 is "built to excel in… hard and mixed snow" and to recommend that users that encounter more hard stuff than soft stuff choose narrower skis. We agree with this final tip. Narrower than 102mm, especially when the construction is light, is better for firm snow.
In short, our experience with the Findr 102 on ice was that it just wouldn't grab with any sort of tenacity. It felt as though only the middle third of the edge length was grabbing at all. The other ultralight, wide-bodied ski we tested is similarly frightening on ice and firm snow. The Top Pick DPS Wailer 99 Tour 1 and the G3 Findr 102 are both suitable only for softer snow types, while the Editors' Choice Kastle TX 98 and Best Buy Blizzard Zero G 95 are both better choices. Both of these grab more reliably and smoothly, with greater edge engagement than the Findr.
This is what we live for, and this is what the Findr is made for. Once you are accustomed to the technical inputs required of the Findr 102, skiing thousands of feet of powder, up and down, is what these are made for. They float reliably, snap from one turn to the next, and track straight and predictably. We never buried a tip nor had a ski wander off on us in thousands of feet of 2018 Teton pow. These prefer short, snappy powder turns more than fast and high radius riding.
If, overall, the downhill performance of the Findr is underwhelming, we've been pleased with the poor snow performance. The shape, mass, and materials seem to work together to bring both ski tips up out of breakable crust, in parallel and without errant moves. This is a tall order.
Other skis do better, but many do much more poorly. For the mass, only the Editors' Choice Kastle TX 98 is a better poor snow rider. The Findr is right in the mix with the average skis in our review, like the Best Buy Blizzard Zero G and the Fischer Hannibal 96.
First, these skis punish newer skiers. If your ski skills are not in the upper echelon, look elsewhere. For the ski technique wizards out there, consider these soft snow specialists. In this way they are similar to the Black Diamond Helio 105. The Helio is just a little more forgiving of newer skiers.
At retail, these skis are about middle of the road. The good news, though, is that this model in 2018-19 is the exact same as it has been since the 16-17 season. Three seasons now of production means that there are deals to be had out there.
They are not our favorite skis of all time, by any means. For soft snow, human-powered riding by skiers with high-end technique and patience to adapt to some demands, the Findr has a place.
— Jediah Porter