MSR DynaLock Trail Review
Compare prices at 2 resellers Pros: Inexpensive, great locking mechanism
Cons: Fragile construction, powder baskets are too big, cumbersome grip
Manufacturer: MSR
Our Verdict
Compare to Similar Products
 This Product
MSR DynaLock Trail | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awards |  | |  | ||
| Price | $60 List | Check Price at REI Compare at 3 sellers | Check Price at Backcountry Compare at 2 sellers | Check Price at Backcountry Compare at 3 sellers | $90 List |
Overall Score  |
|||||
| Star Rating | |||||
| Pros | Inexpensive, great locking mechanism | Comfortable grip, lightweight, good features | Packs very short and slender, lightweight, simple and fast to use | Simple design, good durability, comfortable grip | Awesome primary and secondary grips, good locking mechanisms, durable |
| Cons | Fragile construction, powder baskets are too big, cumbersome grip | Not as durable as some, doesn't pack small enough for splitboarders | Fixed length, not as strong as other poles | Sluggish swing weight, doesn't pack as small as we hoped | On the heavier side, doesn't pack small |
| Bottom Line | An inexpensive option that disappointed us in some key performance areas | Lightweight aluminum and carbon hybrid poles that are packed with elite performance and features for all tours, long or short | The favorite among our splitboarders, this lightweight pole folds down very small to discretely pack away for the descent | A good ski pole at a decent price, but there are better options out there | A very durable and practical ski pole at a great price |
| Rating Categories | MSR DynaLock Trail | Black Diamond Razor... | Black Diamond Carbo... | Black Diamond Exped... | Black Diamond Traverse |
| Ease Of Use (35%) | |||||
| Weight (20%) | |||||
| Durability (15%) | |||||
| Packed Size (15%) | |||||
| Comfort (15%) | |||||
| Specs | MSR DynaLock Trail | Black Diamond Razor... | Black Diamond Carbo... | Black Diamond Exped... | Black Diamond Traverse |
| Size Tested | 140 cm | 140 cm | 120 cm | 140 cm | 155 cm |
| Measured Weight Per Pair (oz) | 21 oz | 18 oz | 18 oz | 19 oz | 21 oz |
| Shaft Material | Aluminum | Carbon, aluminum | Carbon fiber | Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Min Length (cm) | 100 cm | 115 cm | 120 cm | 62 cm | 105 cm |
| Max Length (cm) | 140 cm | 140 cm | 120 cm | 140 cm | 155 cm |
| Pole Design | Two-Piece | Adjustable | Z-Pole | Double Adjustable | Adjustable |
| Locking Mechanism | DynaLock | Flick Lock | Z-Pole | Dual Flick Lock | Flick Lock |
Our Analysis and Test Results
The DynaLock Trail is named after its thoughtfully engineered locking mechanism, which works. Otherwise, the grip was uncomfortable, the baskets were awkwardly shaped, and its durability is suspect.
Performance Comparison
Ease Of Use
The DynaLock Trail is not well-designed for everyday backcountry use. The handle is made of a dense polymer that becomes hard in cold temperatures and loses its grip. We were able to use the top of the handle to flick heel risers, but it is not shaped to make this task particularly easy. Furthermore, there is no secondary grip, so choking up on the pole during traversing is less secure. Most backcountry ski poles have this feature, and the Dynalock does not. Our testers approved of the locking mechanism, which is secure and can be hand-tightened in the field.
Our testers did not, however, like the DynaLock's powder baskets. They are huge, and are styled as an ode to powder baskets of the past. Their deep snow performance is great, but in firm snow, they prevent the tip from penetrating deeply while sidehilling. The pole also comes with very small baskets, however, they were are small to be functional in the backcountry, and are best suited to resort use.
Weight
The DynaLock Trail weighs 19 ounces per pair, which is on the heavier side of all poles in our review, but not far off the average. In general, the weight is not noticeable and they feel like any other ski pole. The large powder baskets make the lower section of the pole feel heavy, affecting the swing weight in a negative way. The pole feels bottom-heavy and takes more effort to swing than others in the review. This makes short, quick turns in steep terrain more difficult.
Durability
The DynaLock seems like a durable, aluminum pole with sturdy components. However, we were able to break one pole during hard, in-bounds use. For most backcountry skiers seeking soft snow and low impacts, this isn't a concern, but for hard-chargers and steep skiers who might encounter firm surfaces, this is notable.
Packed Size
The DynaLock Trail is a two-piece telescoping pole, and like others with this design, it doesn't pack very small at all. It is not designed for splitboarding, and can't be collapsed down to fit on a backpack. The minimum length of the pole when collapsed is 80 centimeters, or 31.5 inches.
Comfort
The DynaLock Trail isn't as comfortable as other backcountry ski poles in our test. This is due to the handle being too small and narrow for big hands or big gloves. When skinning across the fall line or traversing across firm snow, the lack of a secondary grip below the main handle is frustrating, especially because most other backcountry ski poles have this useful feature. Furthermore, the grip material gets firm and uncomfortable to hold on cold days.
Value
The DynaLock Trail is the least expensive backcountry ski pole in our review, but in this case, you get what you pay for. It lacks key design features that we need in a good pole, like comfortable handles, secondary grips, and effective baskets. As such, we would not recommend this pole to anyone who can afford a slightly more expensive option. If you can deal with the DynaLock's lack of features and are looking for a budget ski pole, then it might be a good value, but if that is the case, you can probably get away with a resort ski pole with powder baskets and some hockey tape underneath the main grip.
Conclusion
We were excited to test the DynaLock Trail because of MSR's great reputation. Unfortunately, we were disappointed. It lacks key design features and may pose a durability threat. There are better backcountry ski poles out there, but none are less expensive.
— Henry Feder