Black Diamond Expedition 3 Review
Compare prices at 2 resellers Pros: Simple design, good durability, comfortable grip
Cons: Sluggish swing weight, doesn't pack as small as we hoped
Manufacturer: Black Diamond Equipment
Compare to Similar Products
Black Diamond Expedition 3
|Price||$76.93 at REI|
Compare at 2 sellers
|$149.95 at Amazon||$170 List||$155 List||$199.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 2 sellers
|Pros||Simple design, good durability, comfortable grip||Comfortable grip, lightweight, good features||Packs very short and slender, lightweight, simple and fast to use||Nice grip features, relatively light, easy to use||Very comfortable to hold, packs small for splitboarding, good length adjustment|
|Cons||Sluggish swing weight, doesn't pack as small as we hoped||Not as durable as some, doesn't pack small enough for splitboarders||Fixed length, not as strong as other poles||Not durable, grip only works for large hands, doesn't pack small||Some play in the pole sections when extended, relatively heavy, expensive, slow in transition|
|Bottom Line||An unremarkable 3-section backcountry ski pole, but can double as a trekking pole||These lightweight poles are great for big days in the hills||The right choice for splitboarding, this pair is simple to use and packs small||A good carbon pole for users with large hands||A high-performance pole for splitboarders or skiers with some room for improvement|
|Rating Categories||Black Diamond Expedition 3||Black Diamond Razor Carbon Pro||Black Diamond Carbon Compactor||G3 Via Carbon||Leki Tour Stick Vario Carbon|
|Ease Of Use (35%)|
|Packed Size (15%)|
|Specs||Black Diamond...||Black Diamond...||Black Diamond...||G3 Via Carbon||Leki Tour Stick...|
|Size Tested||140 cm||140 cm||120 cm||Long||135 cm|
|Measured Weight Per Pair (oz)||19 oz||18 oz||18 oz||18 oz||19 oz|
|Shaft Material||Aluminum||Carbon, aluminum||Carbon fiber||Carbon||Carbon, aluminum|
|Min Length (cm)||62 cm||115 cm||120 cm||115 cm||115 cm|
|Max Length (cm)||140 cm||140 cm||120 cm||145 cm||135 cm|
|Pole Design||Double Adjustable||Adjustable||Z-Pole||Adjustable||Adjustable|
|Locking Mechanism||Dual Flick Lock||Flick Lock||Z-Pole||Flick Lock||Speed Lock 2|
Our Analysis and Test Results
In general, this pole works well. The grip is comfortable, the lever locks are solid, and there's a lot of length adjustability. The major downside is that is doesn't collapse as small as it needs to for splitboarders, and skiers will probably just stick to a 2-section pole that is simpler to adjust. This poles might just be stuck in the middle.
Ease of Use
The Expedition 3 has some great features that make it a breeze to use in the backcountry. The foam grip is well-contoured and continues down the shaft for effective choking up when sidehilling. It's lever locks are easy to adjust with a key, coin, or small screwdriver, and solidly lock the shaft sections into place. We also like the powder baskets, which provide plenty of floatation and remain soft enough to match the slope angle when traversing steep, firm slopes. The handle has a downturned tip, almost like a hook, which is great for flicking heel risers up and down.
The main downside of a 3-section pole for skiers is that there are two lever locks to adjust at each transition, instead of just one per pole. This minor annoyance isn't a big deal, and it allows for a ton of length adjustment. This is nice if you plan on using it as a trekking pole in the summer.
The Expedition 3 isn't the lightest pole in our test, but it's not the heaviest either. At 19 ounces per pair, it is about average for backcountry ski poles. The three-section design means there are two lever locks on each shaft, which can be felt in the swing weight. Swinging the pole forward with each turn feels slightly more difficult than it should be. This is only a big deal when making tight, steep turns. But when we're skiing deep powder on the best day of our lives, we don't want to be thinking about how heavy our poles feel.
In general, three-section poles are less durable than two-section poles and are slightly more prone to snapping one of the shaft sections. In theory, more moving parts provide more points of weakness. We didn't encounter any such problems during our testing, and the Expedition 3 showed good durability. The foam grip isn't as durable as other rubber grips, and it developed a few chips and dings during our test period.
The Expedition 3 has a minimum collapsed length of 57 or 62 centimeters, depending on the size you get. This sounds small, but it's actually not small enough to disappear onto the side of a backpack. As such, splitboarders will likely want to explore other options. Skiers generally use two-section telescoping poles because they are lighter and faster to adjust than three-section telescoping poles, as well as offering more durability, all materials equal. The main advantage of a three-section telescoping pole is that it can be used while hiking and trail running in the summer, in addition to backcountry skiing in the winter.
The Expedition 3 has some cool features that make it a comfortable pole to use. The foam grip is contoured to fit all hand sizes comfortably, and the foam also extends below the grip for easily choking up or down while traversing or side-hilling. The top of the handle features a small rubber pad that adds grip when pushing straight down on the top of the pole during sections of steep climbing. The three-section design distributes some weight down towards the basket, creating a heavy swing weight. This is the least comfortable aspect of the pole.
The Expedition 3 is relatively inexpensive, considering the solid performance that it delivers. Furthermore, it can be used in the summer as a trekking pole, making it one of the more versatile backcountry ski poles that we have tested. Black Diamond has an excellent warranty program, making this pole an excellent value for those seeking a good pole at a low price.
The Black Diamond Expedition 3 is a good backcountry ski pole that can also be used as a trekking pole. It delivers average performance across the board, at an above-average value.
— Henry Feder