Black Diamond Expedition 3 Review
Compare prices at 3 resellers Pros: Simple design, good durability, comfortable grip
Cons: Sluggish swing weight, doesn't pack as small as we hoped
Manufacturer: Black Diamond Equipment
Compare to Similar Products
Black Diamond Expedition 3
|Price||Check Price at Backcountry|
Compare at 3 sellers
|$71.73 at REI||$130 List||$145 List||$59.95 at Amazon|
Compare at 2 sellers
|Pros||Simple design, good durability, comfortable grip||Awesome primary and secondary grips, good locking mechanisms, durable||Unique scraper handle, durable for a partially carbon pole, decent grip, releasable wrist strap||Easy to use, feels like a normal ski pole, durable||Inexpensive, great locking mechanism|
|Cons||Sluggish swing weight, doesn't pack as small as we hoped||On the heavier side, doesn't pack small||Doesn't pack small, grip is too small for large hands, heavier than expected||Expensive, comes as a single pole, specific use||Fragile construction, powder baskets are too big, cumbersome grip|
|Bottom Line||A good ski pole at a decent price, but there are better options out there||A very durable and practical ski pole at a great price||A good backcountry ski pole with a unique handle and solid overall durability||Our top recommendation for a ski pole that also provides some ice axe capabilities||An inexpensive option that disappointed us in some key performance areas|
|Rating Categories||Black Diamond Exped...||Black Diamond Traverse||Access Scepter Carbon||Black Diamond Whippet||MSR DynaLock Trail|
|Ease Of Use (35%)|
|Packed Size (15%)|
|Specs||Black Diamond Exped...||Black Diamond Traverse||Access Scepter Carbon||Black Diamond Whippet||MSR DynaLock Trail|
|Size Tested||140 cm||155 cm||145 cm||One Size||140 cm|
|Measured Weight Per Pair (oz)||19 oz||21 oz||21 oz||17.6 oz (single pole)||21 oz|
|Shaft Material||Aluminum||Aluminum||Carbon, aluminum||Aluminum||Aluminum|
|Min Length (cm)||62 cm||105 cm||105 cm||100 cm||100 cm|
|Max Length (cm)||140 cm||155 cm||145 cm||140 cm||140 cm|
|Pole Design||Double Adjustable||Adjustable||Adjustable||3-Piece Adjustable||Two-Piece|
|Locking Mechanism||Dual Flick Lock||Flick Lock||Plastic Lever||Flick Lock Pro||DynaLock|
Our Analysis and Test Results
In general, this pole works well. The grip is comfortable, the lever locks are solid, and there's a lot of length adjustability. The major downside is that is doesn't collapse as small as it needs to for splitboarders, and skiers will probably just stick to a 2-section pole that is simpler to adjust. This poles might just be stuck in the middle.
Ease of Use
The Expedition 3 has some great features that make it a breeze to use in the backcountry. The foam grip is well-contoured and continues down the shaft for effective choking up when sidehilling. It's lever locks are easy to adjust with a key, coin, or small screwdriver, and solidly lock the shaft sections into place. We also like the powder baskets, which provide plenty of floatation and remain soft enough to match the slope angle when traversing steep, firm slopes. The handle has a downturned tip, almost like a hook, which is great for flicking heel risers up and down.
The main downside of a 3-section pole for skiers is that there are two lever locks to adjust at each transition, instead of just one per pole. This minor annoyance isn't a big deal, and it allows for a ton of length adjustment. This is nice if you plan on using it as a trekking pole in the summer.
The Expedition 3 isn't the lightest pole in our test, but it's not the heaviest either. At 19 ounces per pair, it is about average for backcountry ski poles. The three-section design means there are two lever locks on each shaft, which can be felt in the swing weight. Swinging the pole forward with each turn feels slightly more difficult than it should be. This is only a big deal when making tight, steep turns. But when we're skiing deep powder on the best day of our lives, we don't want to be thinking about how heavy our poles feel.
In general, three-section poles are less durable than two-section poles and are slightly more prone to snapping one of the shaft sections. In theory, more moving parts provide more points of weakness. We didn't encounter any such problems during our testing, and the Expedition 3 showed good durability. The foam grip isn't as durable as other rubber grips, and it developed a few chips and dings during our test period.
The Expedition 3 has a minimum collapsed length of 57 or 62 centimeters, depending on the size you get. This sounds small, but it's actually not small enough to disappear onto the side of a backpack. As such, splitboarders will likely want to explore other options. Skiers generally use two-section telescoping poles because they are lighter and faster to adjust than three-section telescoping poles, as well as offering more durability, all materials equal. The main advantage of a three-section telescoping pole is that it can be used while hiking and trail running in the summer, in addition to backcountry skiing in the winter.
The Expedition 3 has some cool features that make it a comfortable pole to use. The foam grip is contoured to fit all hand sizes comfortably, and the foam also extends below the grip for easily choking up or down while traversing or side-hilling. The top of the handle features a small rubber pad that adds grip when pushing straight down on the top of the pole during sections of steep climbing. The three-section design distributes some weight down towards the basket, creating a heavy swing weight. This is the least comfortable aspect of the pole.
The Expedition 3 is relatively inexpensive, considering the solid performance that it delivers. Furthermore, it can be used in the summer as a trekking pole, making it one of the more versatile backcountry ski poles that we have tested. Black Diamond has an excellent warranty program, making this pole an excellent value for those seeking a good pole at a low price.
The Black Diamond Expedition 3 is a good backcountry ski pole that can also be used as a trekking pole. It delivers average performance across the board, at an above-average value.
— Henry Feder