We had very high hopes for the Dynastar Legend W96, after falling completely head-over-heels for their precursors, the Chams, a few years ago. Sadly, they didn't provide the joy we felt while ripping on the originals, but the Legends are still a respectable ski. They thrive in powder, soft snow, crud and even bumps; when it comes to on-piste carving, edge hold, and stability, they fall somewhat short. They are no where near as sprightly and fun as the Chams, but maybe it's unfair to compare them to their older sister.
Dynastar Legend W 96 ReviewPrice: $650 List | $649.95 at REI
Compare prices at 3 resellers Pros: Great in soft snow, tight turn radius, good in chop
Cons: Lacks the finesse and liveliness of older Dynastars
Bottom line: A very capable ski in a variety of environments, but missing the energy of its predecessor, the Cham.
Weight Per Pair (Pounds): 7.55
Available Lengths: 158,165,171,178
RELATED REVIEW: The Best Women's All-Mountain Skis of 2018
Our Analysis and Test Results
The Dynastar Legends have so much going for them; it's just a shame they have to live in the shadow of such a favorite and thrilling ski, the Cham. If we hadn't found ourselves constantly comparing them, we almost certainly would have rated them higher.
Stability at Speed
The Legends fall towards the middle of the bunch in this category, with decent edge hold in the steeps, but some floppy tip fluttering on high-speed groomer turns as well as in the crud. While they perform better in this arena than the Icelantic Oracle 88s or the Volkl 90Eights, they don't feel quite as secure when put through their paces as the Blizzard Black Pearl 98s or the Rossignol Soul 7HD Ws.
The Legends have a 14m turn radius at the 171cm length, giving them quite the tight curvature regarding turn shape. They are, however, surprisingly happy to make big swooping pow turns, but back on the groomers, they can be convinced to make nearly a slalom-style arc when you bend them. Compared to the Elan Ripstick 94 W and the Rossis, they aren't as capable of leaving clean lines down the run and sometimes tend to make an unsolicited skid. With a heap of rocker at the front, leaving the skiable edge feeling shorter, some of our taller testers felt they might even enjoy the 178cm ski more.
The shape of these skis makes them a perfect powder machine, but again, a longer length than you might normally ski is recommended, especially if you're considering them to be a powder ski with benefits. The beautiful rockered spatula at the tips kept us tearing across the surface of the soft snow, feeling invincible. For an even more powder-oriented experience, try the Rossignols; for something more multipurpose that skis slightly better in the fresh, we like the Head Great Joys. The Legends did outperform the Atomic Vantage WMN 95 C and the 90eights in deep snow.
The Legends were legendary in the crud, zinging from slick glacial ice into wind-scoured sastrugi without hesitation and without bucking their rider. Even when driven through grabby breakable crust, the Legends were stiff enough to cut through and continue in the desired direction. Some testers did feel a bit of kickback from the saggy tips ricocheting through chunky conditions, but most were surprised by the self-assurance they felt in awkward snow. While they don't go out and massacre the crud like the Rossignols and the Volkl Auras do, they have significantly more audacity to blast through tough conditions than the Icelantics or the K2s FulLuvits.
This is the sphere in which we missed the old Dynastar Chams and their liveliness. The Legends were powerful, but not playful. We yearned for the Chams and their sprightly rebound, as well as their love of flight. The Legends would rather stick to the ground and plow through things, rather than hopping over them. For a strong ski which is also playful, have a look at the Head Great Joys. If you want something both lighter and more fun, the Oracles are a good choice. However, in the realm of stiffer skis, the Dynastars were more of a kick than the Auras or the Black Pearls.
Very enjoyable and resourceful in the bumps, the Legends are happy to smear and pivot their way around moguls and trees alike. We loved their quickness to turn and lack of lag time between edges, despite their 96mm waist. They didn't have the lightness that the Icelantics did in mogul fields, but they did wend their way through bump lines with greater ease than the Atomics. Earlier, we recommended a longer length in this ski for those planning on mostly making fresh tracks on them; if you're expecting to take them to Mary Jane at Winter Park, however, stick to your normal ski length.
The Legends are a solid crud and powder ski which are also reasonably capable in other conditions. If you're a big mountain skier looking for something which functions well enough back on-piste, this could be the ski for you.
With a price tag around $650, these skis fall in the middle of the pack concerning cost. Full vertical sidewalls bring strength and lasting durability to the ski. For something cheaper and nearly as adaptable, check out our Best Buy, the Oracle 88s.
The Legends are well rounded and capable, just like their predecessor, the Chams. However, we just didn't adore them like we did their older sister. They lack the pure energy and pizzazz that we felt in every moment on the Chams.
Other Versions and Accessories
The men's version is the Legend X96, which has a similar shape and construction, including a lightweight Paulownia Wood Core but also adds in a Titanal laminate.
OutdoorGearLab Member Reviews
Most recent review: January 25, 2018
Have you used this product?
Don't hold back. Share your viewpoint by posting a review with your thoughts...