Adidas Vigor 5 Review
Cons: Narrow, uncomfortable, laces won’t stay tied, hot, doesn’t drain well
Our Analysis and Test Results
While the Adidas Vigor 4 TR was not one of our favorite shoes last year, we thought that it had many good qualities that could be improved upon, and so we had high hopes for the Vigor 5. Unfortunately we were let down; this feels like a very similar shoe but with some baffling (stylish?) design elements that led to much lower performance. We are pretty surprised to read all the happy reviews online, because to our testers, these had by far the poorest design of any trail shoe we have tried.
Foot protection is about the only department where these shoes shine. Despite not having a midsole rockplate, these shoes are very stiff and firm underfoot. As a result, they do a great job of cushioning the bottom of the foot from sharp rocks. They also feature a fairly bombproof "nubuck-like" upper that won't tear and is great for protecting the sides of the foot. It was honestly one of the more protective shoes we tested, comparable to the Brooks Cascadia 10.
The Vigor 5 essentially uses the same tread pattern as the Vigor 4, but the rows of lugs are spread out a bit further, a feature that aids in shedding mud, slightly. In reality, it still collects mud and we found the rubber to be hard rather than sticky. While good for running on trails, we needed more friction for scrambling or running on rocks.
The tall stack height and very narrow forefoot meant this was one of the less stable shoes in our test. We found it to be slightly less stable than the New Balance Leadville 1210v2 or the ASICS GEL-FujiTrabuco 4 Neutral.
We had to give the Vigor 5 a 3 out of 10 points for comfort, one of the lowest scores we have ever given for a trail shoe. This characteristic alone keeps us from even thinking about recommending this shoe. The shoe runs very narrow in the forefoot while simultaneously being too wide in the heel. It is the only shoe in the review that didn't feature a mesh upper, instead choosing a solid panel of "nubuck-like" faux leather to cover the entire forefoot. The effect of this is that the faux leather pinches the foot, especially where it creases at the forefoot pivot point, causing noticeable discomfort.
We will concede that with a long break-in period, the shoe became slightly more comfortable and the pinching lessened, and it is only our dedication to you - the fabulous OutdoorGearLab reader - that inspired us to wear these shoes long enough to realize this fact. Our other complaints were that the round laces don't grip each other and come untied easily and frequently. The solid upper also prevents adequate breathing and moisture release. Your foot gets hot running in this shoe, and if you should get it wet it, it tends to stay that way.
At 25.8 ounces for a pair of men's size 11, these rank up there with the heavier shoes in the test. That said, they are still lighter than the ASICS GEL-Kahana 7 and much lighter than the clunky Salomon XA Pro 3D.
Compared to the other shoe models that left off the rockplate in favor of EVA cushioning, the New Balance Leadville 1210v2 and the ASICS Gel-Kahana 7, the Vigor 5 is solid as a rock. There is very little trail feel with this hard shoe, and thus we could only award it 5 out of 10 for sensitivity.
We have a hard time conceiving of where this shoe would work the best. Although this criticism is harsh, we think that a person who tried running for the first time in this shoe, on the trails or anywhere else, would probably end up hating running.
The MSRP for the Adidas Vigor 5 is $80, making it the most affordable shoe we tested for this review. However, as we felt that it was prohibitively uncomfortable, it's hard to say that you would get your money's worth by buying it. Poor value.
If you are still reading after what we have written about the Adidas Vigor 5 above, then you are well aware of how we feel. Compared to every other shoe we have ever tested for running on trails, it is hard to take Adidas seriously as a trail shoe manufacturer if this shoe is their standard. While we thought the Vigor 4 was a decent shoe that could certainly be improved upon, this version was a giant step backward.
— Andy Wellman