Adidas Terrex Speed Review

The Adidas Terrex Speed is apparently in its second edition, despite the lack of numbers to indicate, but this is the first time we have worn and reviewed them. What immediately jumps out is that they fit very long in the toes, while the rest of the shoe also seems a bit sloppy and spacious, especially in the heel. We would recommend sizing down half a size to correct this, but also warn potential purchasers that you will then likely be getting a fairly narrow shoe, so those with wide feet may be disappointed.

The sloppy fit affected many aspects of our experience in this shoe, from comfort to stability, and not for the better. These problems, combined with the thin and relatively unprotective midsole and less than perfect traction, ensured that this shoe fell near the bottom of our comparative rankings. Despite this, we feel there are compelling reasons some people may want to give them a spin (price, weight), but warn not to expect the most highly refined product.

Performance Comparison

The Adidas Terrex Speed are a light, minimalist, and sensitive shoe that inspire fast running, but don't protect the feet very much. They are an affordable option for those on a budget, but also have a wonky fit that is hard to hit right, so consider trying them on first.

Foot Protection

Among the shoes in this review, these have perhaps the least amount of protective foam underfoot, which is also fairly squishy and lacking in firm shock absorbing ability. Suffice to say that you can feel every little pebble that you step on while wearing these shoes, and they are thus best used on smooth and fast dirt trails, rather than on rocky, rooty terrain. The upper is also lacking in protection, with exposed lightweight mesh on all sides, even in the high wear areas. That said, we appreciate the excellent and effective toe bumper. For a low to the ground shoe that still offers an impressive amount of underfoot protection, check out the Nike Terra Kiger 5.

These shoes feature minimal underfoot protection, limiting them to only being practical for shorter distance runs that don't put a ton of stress on the feet. To go longer in them would require some very hearty musculature.

Traction

The outsole on the Terrex Speed is made by Continental Rubber, and while it feels sticky to the touch, we found it to be one of the least sticky when testing side by side on rocky talus. It has triangular and chevron-shaped lugs spread out evenly throughout the bottom of the sole, but they are pretty short, around 2-3mm depending on location, making them among the least aggressive. They are similar in depth to those found on The North Face Ampezzo, making them better for dirt roads, smooth trails, and crossover terrain, than for gnarly mountain trails that feature lots of rocks, mud, snow, or even just steep dirt.

The traction on this shoe features a Continental Rubber outsole which is not the stickiest on rock, and has a bunch of rather short lugs compared to many other trail runners. It works just fine on dirt trails, but is not as proficient in slippery, wet, or very steep terrain.

Stability

This shoe rides low to the ground, aiding in its overall stability. However, it features an 8mm heel-toe drop, which is impressively high for such a minimal shoe. To us, the drop wasn't nearly as noticeable as when wearing other 8mm drop shoes, such as the Salomon S/Lab Ultra 2. What we didn't like is that the shoe doesn't lock the foot down very well, a by-product of the poor sizing, and this means there is a lot of slop. The long length means our feet wanted to slide forward a lot going downhill, and we also experienced a lot of movement in the midfoot and especially heel. Sadly, these flaws negate one of the best side-effects of having a low to the ground shoe, its stability.

Riding low to the ground, these shoes are pretty stable when on flat and smooth trails like this one. The sloppy fit didn't inspire confidence on rougher terrain, however.

Comfort

We are a bit conflicted on how to rate this shoe for comfort, because the fit is terrible, but the shoe itself isn't that uncomfortable. It might be best to say that we enjoyed this shoe more simply wearing it around town and walking around than we did while running in it.

The fit of these shoes is a bit off, in particular they are very long. Here pointing to the ends of our big toes, a common way of judging for size in a shoe. While a bit of space between the toes and the front of the shoe is desired, this is excessive.

The upper has minimal to no padding, mostly built into the upper material, without cushioned pads around the ankle opening like most shoes. The low profile around the ankle is nice, though, because it doesn't allow lots of sand and debris to filter into the shoe very easily. However, the overall narrow, yet long and very sloppy fit means we can't really call this one of the more comfortable shoes for running, which is how we are grading them.

While the heel fits slightly loose, we like hoe the entire upper is sewn together with the tongue, as you can see here, to form this collar around the ankle, which is comfortable and does a good job keeping out debris.

Weight

Our pair of men's size 11 US shoes weigh 19.4 ounces, placing them in the upper echelon of lightweight shoes. They are roughly the same weight as the more protective Scarpa Spin, as well as the similarly sensitive Altra Superior 4. They are nowhere near as light as the very lightest shoes in this review, the Hoka Evo Jawz. Suffice to say, this is one of the best attributes of this shoe.

At a mere 19.4 ounces per pair for a size 11, these are indeed very light shoes, and can genuinely claim to be ultralight. For this weight you will sacrifice a bit of foot protection, however.

Sensitivity

If you like to feel the trail as it passes beneath your feet more than you like to stomp and crush it into oblivion, then this may just be the shoe for you. It is easily among the most sensitive that we tested, with the thin foam midsole allowing impacts on sharp rocks to pass straight through to the foot. To run on difficult terrain in this shoe you will need to be more dancer than charger, and if you want to charge, best to find some smooth and flowy single track. Once again, however, we must point out that the poor fit affects the responsiveness, and other sensitive shoes such as the Superior 4 or Scarpa Spin may be a better bet.

These shoes are extremely sensitive underfoot, and we easily felt all the sharp edges of rocks in this talus field. For shorter rocky runs this is generally ok, but on long runs the feet can really take a beating without more protection.

Best Applications

This shoe is best used for shorter runs on smoother trails and lends itself well to running on dirt roads or for cross over, road-to-trail runs. Its light weight makes you want to run fast. It lacks the support or protection for long runs or technical, rocky terrain.

The Terrex Speed are ideal for shorter runs on smoother trails, and are great fun for running speed work or at an up tempo pace. This smooth dirt trail, the Grey Butte Trail, is the perfect type of terrain for them.

Value

These shoes retail for $100, tying them for the least expensive model in our review. While we have pointed out the fit issues, if you can dial in the fit, we think they present a pretty solid value, as long as you are realistic with your expectations for what they can handle.

Conclusion

The Adidas Terrex Speed is a lightweight, low to the ground shoe that is affordably priced. In our experience, they are sized poorly, with a very long toe and a sloppy heel and midfoot, and a rather narrow forefoot. Sizing down half a size will help, but runners with narrow feet will surely like them better than those with wide feet. They are a pretty decent trail running shoe but compared to the competition, not one of our favorites.

Getting in some leg turnover in the super lightweight Adidas Terrex Speed on the Grey Butte Trail in central Oregon, which is clearly more fun when constantly being chased by the crazy puppy Rishi.