Asolo Falcon GV Review

The Falcon GV is a perfect representation of the advances in materials technology which have allowed footwear to maintain the same levels of support and stability while shedding pounds of weight off. While not the lightest boots in our review, they are remarkably protective for their weight, making them a model worth looking at.

Performance Comparison

The Falcon GV in their element: willing to tackle long miles over granite slabs and boulders.

Comfort

Our lead reviewer pulled these boots out of the box, slipped them on, and took off to guide a 3-day ascent of North Palisade in the Sierra Nevada. While not technically difficult, this route travels through trail and talus, up scree, and over rough passes. He found the Falcon GV to be immediately comfortable, requiring no break-in period, as the outer material is made from a combination of soft suede and nylon mesh.

The toe box is roomy but is still able to be laced securely enough to scramble over boulders confidently, and the TPU toe cap protects your toes. The lacing system is traditional, making it easy to replace the laces once worn out. We tested these boots in both hot and cool conditions and were impressed at how well they breathed even during high-output ascents.

The soft and flexible sole on the Falcon GV makes it most appropriate for on-trail hikes.

Stability

With a relatively tall ankle collar, the Falcon GV snugly protects us from rolling our ankles while hiking over rough or uneven ground, situations where we are at our most vulnerable as hikers. These boots are more narrow than others, with a forefoot width of 4.25", which is generally speaking a liability, though we found their width to be appropriate and did not feel at any greater risk of rolling our ankles.

Compared to a stiffer model, these boots are soft and pliable in the sole. This translates into better smearing ability on the rock, though more fatigued feet at the end of a hiking day and the ability to feel more pointy objects on the trail.

The tall and supportive ankle helps maintain control over when hopping over obstacles.

Traction

The Falcon GV boots showed overall average performance in traction when considering all the terrain types we encountered. This boot features a quality Vibram rubber compound called MegaGrip, which has been used effectively in high-performance approach shoes and is certainly some of the stickiest rubber in this review. The sole uses a lower profile lug pattern than most. This makes these boots quite useful on slabby rock, but limited in usefulness on loose or wet terrain.

While the Falcon lacked great traction on loose and wet ground, they performed well on smooth rock where the grippy rubber compound could best be evaluated.

Weight

With a verified weight of 2.48 pounds per pair of size 11's (US), the Falcon GV boots are on the light side of average, though this list includes some seriously featherweight models that skew this rating slightly. For their ankle collar height, overall flood height, and waterproofness these boots offer a lot for their weight.

Water Resistance

We picked these boots up and immediately questioned their ability to withstand our 5-minute water submersion test due to the copious nylon used in the outer, but were blown away by how well the Gore-Tex Extended Comfort membrane repels water. Well after the 5 minutes had elapsed, we still had no signs of leakage, and only got out of the mountain stream we used because our feet were getting cold!

Perhaps the Falcon GV's best performance: submerged in an alpine stream! These let no water in even after 10 minutes of submersion.

With a flood height of 5.75 inches, these boots provide as much protection as big leather boots do. That alone makes these boots an appealing choice for those who encounter lots of stream crossings on their hikes but want to keep the weight on their feet relatively low.

Durability

We didn't put the kid gloves on when we took the Falcon boots for their initial test drive - we plowed them right through endless granite basins and kicked steps up loose scree gullies. Though we would tend to prefer a boot that has a full leather outer in these conditions, we were impressed that the supple suede and nylon upper was in as good of shape as it was at the end of that trip. The high-tenacity nylon showed no abrasion, while the suede around the heel cup was scuffed. These boots will likely last for a few years if treated kindly, and perhaps only a season if worn hard.

Putting the Falcons through the paces in loose sediment in the Sierras.

Value

These boots are objectively expensive when compared to boots that retail for much less, are lighter, and have better traction performance.

Conclusion