The Columbia Whirlibird jacket is our favorite of the three-in-one type jackets we tested since it is the most comfortable and least expensive. This is the fourth iteration of the Whirlibird we've tested and it continues to perform well at an amazing price, which is why it wins our Best Buy Award. We really like how the layers perform individually but found that they don't work in combination quite as well we would hope. Columbia has upped the Whirlibird's game by including pockets in the inner jacket layer as well as the shell, which puts it head and shoulders above The North Face ThermoBall Triclimate. This jacket won our Best Buy award due to its style, versatility, multiple wear options, and it is also one of the least expensive jackets in this review, making it a great value.
Columbia Whirlibird Interchange - Women's ReviewPrice: $200 List | $149.99 at MooseJaw
Compare prices at 2 resellers Pros: Comfortable, warm, looks good, inner layer is good for around town, inexpensive
Cons: Two layers do not work well together: snow skirt doesn’t work with inner layer
Bottom line: A screaming deal for two jackets in one the Whirlibird will help you perform out on the ski hill.
# of Pockets: Shell: 2, Liner: 4
Main Fabric: Omni-Tech Shell: 100% polyester twill, Liner jacket: 100% polyester Storm Lite DP II
RELATED REVIEW: The 10 Best Ski Jackets for Women
Our Analysis and Test Results
A three-in-one jacket, this piece allows for more versatile layering options than a stand-alone jacket, which in turn makes it a great deal, and earns it our Best Buy Award. This jacket has three different wear options: the outer layer can be worn alone on warm days when you only need a wind layer, the interior insulation layer can be worn by itself around town to keep you warm, and both can be worn together for the exceptionally cold and windy days on the slopes.
The Whirlibird proved relatively water resistant during our test. Its shell materials are inferior to the Gore-Tex Patagonia Primo Down Jacket - Women's and the hard shell jackets like the Arc'teryx Sentinel materials for water resistance.
We did not notice any wind getting in through the zippers, but had a hard time zipping up the collar if we had any extra layers around our neck like a buff or neck warmer.
This jacket's hood does not quite fit over a ski helmet; we have trouble keeping it on when skiing downhill. The hood is removable, which we think is somewhat unnecessary. We like ski jackets with hoods because they add an element of protection and warmth. Detachable hoods just add extra weight and bulk with snaps and zippers, and we have never thought "gee I wish this jacket didn't have a hood!" In fact, we've thought the opposite about non-hooded jackets.
The Whirlibird is somewhat breathable, although we still worked up a sweat occasionally in it. One point of frustration with this jacket and the other 3-in-1 models like the Patagonia Snowbelle is that it has pit-zips for ventilation, but you cannot vent the interior jacket.
This is just one example of the two layers not working well together, and we discovered a few occasions that this happens. The Omni-Heat system's tiny dots are supposed to allow moisture to move out between them for breathability. (So it is slightly more breathable than an actual space blanket!) We are not sure if the silver dots facilitated moisture transfer or not, but the synthetic material seemed to wick moisture away sufficiently.
One advantage to a 3-in-1 type jacket is that you can just take the insulating layer off if it's warm outside. We think the shell Patagonia Untracked Jacket has the best ventilation of all the jackets we tested apart from a removable inner jacket.
The Whirlibird has a removable interior synthetic jacket that uses Columbia's unique Omni-Heat technology to keep you warm. We were skeptical at first because it looks like a flashy gimmick — but it seems to work.
The inner jacket is made from synthetic insulation and is lined with tiny aluminum dots that are designed to reflect your body heat back in towards you, similar in function to a foil space blanket. Heat loss through radiation is not the significant method of heat loss when skiing - convection through wind and conduction through sitting on a chilly chairlift are the ways most likely to steal heat. That being said, we are not sure if it was those reflective dots that kept us warm, or if it was the combination of the thick synthetic insulation and the wind-resistant outer shell, but we stayed toasty.
We are not sold on the durability of the liner material and are afraid that the little silver dots will wear off eventually, but in our testing so far they have held up. The Whirlibird has 80 grams of insulation, is warmer than the Patagonia Snowbelle 3-in-1, but not quite as warm as Patagonia Primo Down.
The Whirlibird's ski features work well if you plan to use both layers together. There is a goggle pocket and interior zip pocket on the inner layer, but there is not a goggle pocket or inner zip pocket on the shell layer. This is great if you plan to use the two layers together, but not so great when you're going out on a warm day and just want to wear the shell.
The shell does have a powder skirt (which won't work if the inner layer is connected) and two handwarmer pockets. It could do with a pass pocket or other small zippered pocket to stash things like credit cards in.
We think that its layers work well separately. The shell is a fantastic wind and water resistant layer to wear on a warm day, and the interior layer is a warm and cute layer to wear around town for après-ski activities, but together they make the jacket less functional. When the internal layer is zipped in, it makes the powder skirt less practical and awkward to use. The Whirlibird and the other 3-in-1 style jacket the Patagonia Snowbelle 3-in-1 both had this issue. The North Face ThermoBall Triclimate does not have any special ski features, and so this is less of an issue. This problem can be easily solved if you zip each layer to itself and do not attach them, although Columbia did not intend for you to wear them this way.
This jacket was the most stylish of the three-in-one jackets.
We thought that both the interior and exterior jackets looked good and functioned great individually, and especially liked wearing the cozy interior jacket around because it is warm and fits well. The Snowbelle was a very roomy jacket, and the white color we tested it in was not practical.
The cut of the jacket is a bit boxy but allows for space to put things in your pockets without looking strange. We're less crazy about the colors and patterns it comes in this year.
Comfort and Fit
The Whirlibird is pretty comfortable although the shell material this year seems thicker and stiffer than in previous years. It allows for good mobility while carving turns on the ski hill. Columbia's sizing is more relaxed, and our medium testers fall well within the medium specs. You should be able to order the jacket in your usual size if your measurements fall in the right category, with room to spare for extra mid-layers.
This jacket is meant for skiing at the resort in all different types of climates. On a warm day leave the inner layer in the car (to change into for après ski), on a colder day wear them both together.
The Whirlibird is the best value of the jackets in this review retailing for $200. It is two separate jackets (that can be worn together) for a single low price. The Flylow Billie Coat is also a good value if you are looking for an inexpensive shell ski jacket and the Orage Nina also wins a Best Buy award because it is a very stylish insulated ski jacket.
For a versatile and inexpensive ski jacket, the Whirlibird will serve you well. Its two layers work better individually then they do together, but have enough warmth and ski features to keep you functioning on the mountain. For less than half the price of our Editors' Choice winner, the Patagonia Primo Down Jacket- Women's, the Whirlibird will still get you out on the hill and keep you warm and dry, which is why we give it our Best Buy Award.
OutdoorGearLab Member Reviews
Most recent review: February 23, 2018
Have you used this product?
Don't hold back. Share your viewpoint by posting a review with your thoughts...