When we glance at our scoring matrix, these pants could be called the most "average" pants in our review. None of their scores suffer greatly, while none stand out at the top of the heap either. When you get this well-balanced performance at a reasonable price, you jump on it. These are a good value. Others are a little less expensive but suffer in one way or another, performance wise. To maximize performance, as with our Editors Choice Arc'teryx Alpha SL, you will pay a great deal more than you will for the PreCip pants.
Marmot PreCip Pant Review
Budget, lightweight pants totally suitable for occasional use.
Price: $80 List | $55.97 at Backcountry
Compare prices at 3 resellers Pros: Compact, light, affordable
Cons: Thin fabric prone to tearing, limited breathability
Manufacturer: Marmot
Compare prices at 3 resellers Pros: Compact, light, affordable
Cons: Thin fabric prone to tearing, limited breathability
Manufacturer: Marmot
By Ian Nicholson ⋅ Review Editor ⋅ Nov 9, 2018
RELATED: The Best Rain Pants For Men
The Skinny
Compare to Similar Products
Our Analysis and Test Results
Marmot's venerable Precip line of shell gear offers lightweight, budget-minded performance in a variety of forms. In this review, we test both this traditional format (1/4 cuff zips) and the fully separating Marmot PreCip Full Zip. In most ways, and definitely the important ways, these pants are identical to one another. The fabric and fit are the same. The durability and weather protection, therefore, are basically the same. The full zip version vents better and is easier to get on and off. This version is lighter, more compact, and less expensive.
The membrane is fully waterproof, and Marmot's "DWR" lasts better than average. What more can you ask for? The lack of long zippers leaves even less room for breach. This model scores slightly better than the cousin Marmot PreCip Full Zip because the full zippers are a little more vulnerable to leakage. We had no actual problems with our tested full zip pants, but we know from past experience and logic that the mechanical zippers are potentially leaky. The Editors Choice Arc Teryx Alpha SL protects from gnarly wet conditions even better than the Precip.
A relatively loose fit and softly draping fabric are the Precip pants' positive comfort attributes. The thin fabric is a little clingy while the bare membrane lining is cold against bare legs. These things are minor, especially when wearing long pants beneath, but they need to be noted.
The Editors' Choice Mountain Hardwear Stretch Ozonic is the comfort king in our review. The fabric really is quite stretchy. And this is noticeable when you wear them. The softer lining and careful tailoring of the other Editors Choice Arc Teryx Alpha SL edges it ahead in this category also. Both PreCip pants (these, and the full zip version) score similarly in terms of comfort. The Top Pick ultralight Outdoor Research Helium is also very comfortable, especially considering just how light they are.
The thin fabric and mostly exposed internal coating of the PreCip pants are vulnerable to degradation. Our test period wasn't long enough to elicit failure, but we know from experience that fabric of this thickness will tear when snagged on thorns or rocks. This is the primary "cost" of lightweight and inexpensive equipment.
Performance Comparison
These are great waterproof pants for anyone on a budget. Especially for those for whom weight and bulk are a concern, the Marmot PreCip should be on your short list. Durability and breathability suffer as compared to the more expensive products, but for short exposures to wet weather, these things matter a lot less.
We like long walks in the rain. But only for testing rain gear. Here, the PreCip Oants keep out driving and cold water in South America.
Water Resistance
The membrane is fully waterproof, and Marmot's "DWR" lasts better than average. What more can you ask for? The lack of long zippers leaves even less room for breach. This model scores slightly better than the cousin Marmot PreCip Full Zip because the full zippers are a little more vulnerable to leakage. We had no actual problems with our tested full zip pants, but we know from past experience and logic that the mechanical zippers are potentially leaky. The Editors Choice Arc Teryx Alpha SL protects from gnarly wet conditions even better than the Precip.
Comfort and Mobility
A relatively loose fit and softly draping fabric are the Precip pants' positive comfort attributes. The thin fabric is a little clingy while the bare membrane lining is cold against bare legs. These things are minor, especially when wearing long pants beneath, but they need to be noted.
The Editors' Choice Mountain Hardwear Stretch Ozonic is the comfort king in our review. The fabric really is quite stretchy. And this is noticeable when you wear them. The softer lining and careful tailoring of the other Editors Choice Arc Teryx Alpha SL edges it ahead in this category also. Both PreCip pants (these, and the full zip version) score similarly in terms of comfort. The Top Pick ultralight Outdoor Research Helium is also very comfortable, especially considering just how light they are.
Breathability and Venting
Marmot's NanoPro fabric and coating are quite breathable, considering the price. For moderate efforts in all but the most thoroughly soaked environments, your body heat will push some of your perspiration, in the form of water vapor, through the fabric of the Precip pants. Zipped venting, like that on the Marmot PreCip Full Zip sheds hot air and moisture even better. Gore-Tex fabric, as featured on the Marmot Minimalist and the Editors' Choice Arc'teryx Alpha SL really does breathe better than the less expensive options.
Marmot PreCip on the left, Editors' Choice Arc'teryx Alpha SL on the right. Both have recently been in the rain, but the Alpha was out longer. As a result, their DWR treatment was overwhelmed. The water you see on the Alpha pants did not get through to the inside.
Features
Given how light the PreCip pants are, they have an excellent set of pockets. There are a total of three mesh-lined pockets. Two in the front and one in the rear. The 1/4 length lower leg zip allows the user to slip all but the bulkiest of mountaineering boots through. Even the Editors' Choice Arc'teryx Alpha SL has far fewer features than the Precip. There are no pockets, for instance, on the Alpha.
The set of three pockets on the PreCip Pants is welcome and useful. Here, the one rear pocket. This is complemented by two hand warmer pockets on the front.
Packed Size
These pants are compact enough to bring on all but the most ultralight of missions. They take up about as much space as a 12 ounce LaCroix can. The Top Pick Outdoor Research Helium is the undisputed packability leader. These are tiny. The PreCip pants are almost twice the size. The Marmot PreCip is about 75% the bulk of the Marmot PreCip Full Zip and considerably smaller than the Editors Choice Arc'teryx Alpha SL.
Compact and lightweight. This is what we look for in rain pants and this small package is our well-scoring PreCip Pants.
Weight
At an even 8 ounces, the PreCip pants are lighter than the rainwater that will collect in your boots on a wet hike. Use that 8 ounces on your legs, and your boots should absorb less water. The weight of the PreCip pants can "pay for itself" that way. Now, our logic isn't bulletproof, but the point is that these aren't very heavy pants.
The Top Pick Outdoor Research Helium pants are even lighter than the PreCip pants, while the REI Talusphere Full Zip is more than twice the mass. The Editors' Choice Mountain Hardwear Stretch Ozonic is only 2 ounces heavier than the PreCip. Notably, the PreCip Full Zip is almost twice as heavy as the 1/4 zipped version. This points to the actual weight of convenience.
To test breathability we swapped pants back and forth in the same wet, active conditions. In this particular comparison, we found that the fabric of the Arc'teryx Alpha SL (on the ground) breathed better than the Precip Pant (on the tester), but not by as much as the price difference might suggest.
Durability
The thin fabric and mostly exposed internal coating of the PreCip pants are vulnerable to degradation. Our test period wasn't long enough to elicit failure, but we know from experience that fabric of this thickness will tear when snagged on thorns or rocks. This is the primary "cost" of lightweight and inexpensive equipment.
For just 2 ounces more, and many many dollars, the Editors Choice Arc'teryx Alpha SL will last years and years longer than the Marmot PreCip, even in heavy and frequent use. On all pants, note that the DWR coating will be the first thing to fail. This is not a failure of the waterproofing. Marmot's lasts pretty well, but will eventually fail, as all DWR treatments do.
The PreCip Pants in action in the high and wild temperate rainforests of Southern Chile.
Best Applications
These are ultralight rain pants to keep at the bottom of your pack for hikes in any climate prone to rain.
The 1/4 length zips of this classic configuration of the Precip Pants work to get on overall but the bulkiest of ski boots and mountaineering boots.
Value
Some products are less expensive and some perform better, but we have long found that Marmot PreCip shell gear strikes a great value. When the products are also pretty light, your calculus gets even easier. These pants are a good value.
Conclusion
You can't go wrong with these pants. Others are more protective, more breathable, more durable, more comfortable or lighter, but none strike the balance of these attributes that the Marmot PreCip does.
— Ian Nicholson