Hydrapak Stow Review
Compare prices at 3 resellers Pros: Durable, lightweight, leak-proof cap, nice feel
Cons: Expensive, lacks versatility, tips over very easily
Compare to Similar Products
|Price||$11.93 at REI|
Compare at 3 sellers
|$11.95 at Backcountry|
Compare at 3 sellers
|$26.21 at Backcountry|
Compare at 3 sellers
|$20.84 at Backcountry|
Compare at 3 sellers
|$19.59 at Amazon|
Compare at 2 sellers
|Pros||Durable, lightweight, leak-proof cap, nice feel||Light, durable, resists flavors, simple design, wide mouth makes for easy filling||Stylish, well-insulated, easy to clean, simple design, durable||Lightweight, well-insulated, simple design, reasonable price tag||Lightweight, easy for one-handed drinking, re-designed sport cap is effective, durable, good color options|
|Cons||Expensive, lacks versatility, tips over very easily||Diameter too big for cup holders, wide mouth makes it difficult to drink from when walking or driving||Heavy, expensive||Carrying handle is an odd size, rim of bottle is a bit sharp||Sport cap not as secure as a screw cap, carrying handle is small|
|Bottom Line||A new development in collapsible bottle design - a soft silicone body and compact shape||It's hard to compare to this iconic bottle in terms of weight, price, and simplicity of design||This insulated bottle ticks all the boxes for one of our favorite bottles ever||We appreciated the lightweight, sleek design of this insulated bottle||We are still stoked on this long-time favorite with its easy-to-use design|
|Rating Categories||Hydrapak Stow||Nalgene Wide-Mouth||Hydro Flask Standard Mouth||GSI Outdoor Microlite 720 Tw...||Klean Kanteen Classic|
|Ease Of Use (40%)|
|Specs||Hydrapak Stow||Nalgene Wide-Mouth||Hydro Flask...||GSI Outdoor...||Klean Kanteen...|
|Body Material||Thermoplastic Polyurethane||Eastman Tritan co-polyester||18/8 stainless steel||Stainless Steel, Polypropylene, Silicone||18/8 stainless steel|
|Empty weight (oz)||2.2 oz||6.3 oz||12.9 oz||10.5 oz||7.4 oz|
|Volume (oz)||34 oz||34 oz||24 oz||24 oz||27 oz|
|Bottle weight (oz) per fluid oz capacity||0.06 oz||0.19 oz||0.54 oz||0.43 oz||0.27 oz|
|Mouth diameter||1 in||2.5 in||2 in||2.25 in||1.75 in|
|Base diameter||2.25 in||3.25 in||3 in||3 in||2.75 in|
|Height||9 in||8.25 in||11 in||9.3 in||11 in|
|Free of Materials||BPA, PVC-free||BPA, BPS and Phthalate Free||BPA-free||BPA-free||BPA-free|
|Cap Materials||Not available||Information not available||Polypropelene||Polypropylene, silicone||Polypropylene, Silicone spout|
|Cap/Lid Type||Screw-cap with spill-proof nozzle||Loop-top screw cap||Wide-loop cap||Screwtop||Sport cap wih spout|
|Volume Options||500 mL||16 oz, 48 oz||18 oz, 21 oz||17 oz, 24 oz, 34 oz||18 oz, 40 oz, 64 oz, loop cap/sports cap, wide mouth|
|Warranty||Beyond Lifetime Guarantee||Lifetime Guarantee for normal use||Lifetime Warranty||Lifetime warranty||Lifetime Warranty|
Our Analysis and Test Results
The Hydrapak Stow is a smart, sleek, and well-designed bottle that ups the ante in the realm of collapsible bottles. We were most excited about the feel of the container and its clever, leak-proof lid.
Ease of Use
Our past grievances with collapsible bottles make up a long list; they are notoriously hard to fill, they lack durability and structure, are tough to clean — we could go on, but we will spare you. These issues we have encountered in the past have made us approach new collapsible bottles with weariness and a particularly critical eye. The Hydrapak Stow impressed us this year, with its smart, simple design that focuses on durability and ease of use. The bottle is a small, square shape — slightly wider, but shorter than the Platypus DuoLock, which has the same capacity. Both bottles are unstable when standing on their own, but the DuoLock does a better job than the Stow. The Stow, however, is more compact both when full and when collapsed, than the Platypus.
We were also pleasantly surprised by the lid on the Stow. Though the cap has a small opening for filling, which is common among collapsible bottles, the sport cap was thoughtfully designed. The cap opens with a few twists. We were worried that this simple twisting cap would open accidentally and leak in our bags, but it's designed with a leak-proof feature that makes the cap act as a one-way valve. Even when open, the sport cap won't leak water! We were impressed. That said, we found the Stow's lid to narrowly fall behind the clever DuoLock technology on the Platypus DuoLock. Lastly, we also like the mL measurements on the side of the bottle. The marks were easy to read and helpful in keeping track of our hydration throughout the day.
In terms of cleaning, the Stow had similar results to the Platypus models. Its narrow mouth makes it nearly impossible to get a bottle brush in there. On the plus side, the mouth and lid are easy to clean. We found it best to use the Stow for only water, to avoid lingering tastes and to increase the longevity of the bottle.
The lightweight nature of collapsible bottles makes them prone to failures in this metric. Overall, we found the Stow to do well overall in comparison to other collapsible bottles in durability. The bottle is made of BPA-free Thermoplastic Polyurethane, which creates a soft, malleable bladder that lacks the hard edges that are prone to cracking — like those of the Platypus. The Stow seems to be set up for relative longevity with its soft-sided construction. Instead of folding, like the Platypus DuoLock seemed to do, the Stow rolls up when empty, eliminating creases that can also be prone to wear and tear.
The area where the Stow seemed most prone to failure was around the cap. Since there isn't anything to twist against, we found that we twisted the soft bottle itself to ensure the cap tightened down. This is a minor grievance, and it didn't fail us during the test period, but we do see the potential for future wear in this specific area.
It comes as no surprise that this malleable, soft-bodied bottle retains a bit of flavor. Plastic bottles tend to retain tastes of electrolyte drinks and other drink mixes for most of their lifespan, and the Hydrapak Stow is no different. As we mentioned above, we found it best to use the Stow as a bottle dedicated only to water if flavor retention is a concern. The spout has many places where flavors can linger, and the material seems to trap flavor as well.
Though not as light as the Platypus DuoLock or the SoftBottle, the Hydrapak Stow is still in the front of the pack in terms of weight. The Stow weighs in at 2 ounces — making it a hair heavier than the Platypus models. We liked the added bit of durability we got with the Stow's soft, silicone body and didn't mind the unnoticeable extra weight when using this bottle as our go-to on hikes and airplane travel.
With a slightly higher price tag than any of the Platypus bottles in this review, the Stow is a bit more of an investment for a collapsible bottle. It retails for $17, whereas the Platypus SoftBottle and the Platypus DuoLock sell for $9 and $14, respectively.
Overall, we were impressed by the Hydrapak Stow 1L. The soft bladder, leak-proof sport cap, and the bottle's ability to store compactly were the main selling points for us. Though we have been fans of the Platypus collapsible bladders for a long time, the overall feel and durable nature of the Stow is a nice change. We were also impressed with the small touches, like the lid and the clip loop that then secures the bottle when rolled. Though the Stow is a bit pricey for a collapsible bottle, we approve of the overall design and performance of this bottle. In general, we still recommend the Platypus DuoLock to our friends looking for a collapsible bottle. But if you've tried and didn't like the more rigid Platypus models, the Stow might be right up your alley.
— Jane Jackson