Reviews You Can Rely On

Ultralight Adventure Equipment Circuit Review

A durable, comfortable pack with a roll-top closure and the ability to carry up to 64 L while remaining lightweight
Ultralight Adventure Equipment Circuit
Photo: Ultralight Adventure Equipment
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Price:  $255 List
Pros:  Durable, large external pocket, roll-top closure, adjustable, compatible with bear can
Cons:  Mesh attracts dirt and pine needles, somewhat bulky
Manufacturer:   Ultralight Adventure Equipment
By Jane Jackson ⋅ Senior Review Editor  ⋅  Apr 30, 2020
  • Share this article:
Our Editors independently research, test, and rate the best products. We only make money if you purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Learn more
68
OVERALL
SCORE


RANKED
#12 of 15
  • Weight-to-Volume Ratio - 35% 6
  • Comfort to Carry - 25% 8
  • Features - 20% 6
  • Adaptability - 10% 7
  • Durability - 10% 8

Our Verdict

Once again, ULA has provided the ultralight backpacking world with yet another great pack. The ULA Circuit is very similar to a favorite from last year's tests, the ULA Ohm 2.0. The Circuit is slightly larger than the Ohm 2.0 and weighs a tad more. This added weight and carrying capacity makes it an excellent option for long distances, heavy loads, or those newer to ultralight backpacking. The Circuit is exceptionally comfortable, especially for heavier loads. Additionally, the feature set provided just about everything we wanted in a pack, with lashing capabilities and a burly mesh outside pocket for clothes and miscellaneous items.

Compare to Similar Products

 
Awards  Editors' Choice Award Top Pick Award Best Buy Award Best Buy Award 
Price $255 List$270 List$145 List$139.95 at Backcountry
Compare at 2 sellers
$199.95 at Backcountry
Compare at 3 sellers
Overall Score Sort Icon
68
90
76
73
68
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pros Durable, large external pocket, roll-top closure, adjustable, compatible with bear canDurable, comfortable, well-designed pockets, carries light and heavy loads wellSimple design, inexpensive, durableVery light, large volume, versatile compression systemGreat for medium loads, inexpensive, thoughtful set of features, external storage and lashing options
Cons Mesh attracts dirt and pine needles, somewhat bulkyLarge capacity makes it less versatileFoam pad falls out easily, shoulder straps lack supportNo frame, poor comfort for medium loadsHeavy, less durable than others
Bottom Line A durable, comfortable pack with a roll-top closure and the ability to carry up to 64 L while remaining lightweightThis pack wowed us with its perfect set of features, comfortable design, and carrying capacityA lightweight, simplified version of our favorite pack from this same company, making a durable, well-designed optionFor the ultimate lightweight pack, this pack steals the show with its entirely frameless design and streamlined set of featuresThis incredible pack has tons of features, carries medium-sized loads well, and is comfortable to boot
Rating Categories Adventure Equipment... Gossamer Gear Mariposa Adventure Equipment... Granite Gear Virga 2 Osprey Exos 48
Weight To Volume Ratio (35%)
6.0
8.0
8.0
10.0
4.0
Comfort To Carry (25%)
8.0
10.0
6.0
5.0
9.0
Features (20%)
6.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
8.0
Adaptability (10%)
7.0
8.0
8.0
6.0
7.0
Durability (10%)
8.0
9.0
9.0
7.0
8.0
Specs Adventure Equipment... Gossamer Gear Mariposa Adventure Equipment... Granite Gear Virga 2 Osprey Exos 48
Measured Weight 40 oz 30.5 oz 24 oz 18.5 oz 37.6 oz
Stripped Weight 37.5 oz 30.5 oz 23 oz 18.5 oz 33.9 oz
Claimed Volume 68 L 60 L 54 L 50-58 L 48 L
Measured Main Pack Volume 46 L 48 L 45 L 41 L 40 L
Measured Volume Total (minus hip belt and shoulder strap pockets) 64 L 64 L 53 L 49 L 59 L
Measured Volume Stripped (minus hip belt, shoulder pockets, and removable lids) 64 L 59 L 53 L 49 L 53 L
Average Weight-to-Volume Ratio (grams/Liter) 17.5 g/L 14 g/L 12.8 g/L 10 g/L 18.9 g/L
Carrying Comfort 15 pounds Good Great Great Good Good
Carrying Comfort 30 pounds Great Great Poor Poor Great
Frame Type Simple frame- 1.2 oz carbon fiber/delrin active suspension frame loop Foam pad/ removable stay Removable foam pad None (foam pad) Tensioned Frame - AirSpeed SL Suspension
Fabric ULA 210 Robic nylon 70 & 100 denier Robic nylon 210 Robic nylon, 400d Robic Bottom Panel Cordura 100D high tenacity nylon, 100D high tenacity ripstop nylon
Main Pack Pockets 3 4 3 3 3
Hip Belt Pockets 2 2 2 None None
Single Hip Belt Pocket Capacity 2 4 2 cliff bars N/a N/a
Shoulder Strap Pockets No No No No No
Whistle on Sternum Strap No No No None Yes
Internal Hydration Sleeve Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Bag Sizes/Torso Lengths Available S, M, L, XL S, M, L S, M, L, XL Long, short, regular S, M, L
Mix and Match Hip Belt Sizes XS, S, M, L, XL S, M, L S, M, L, XL No No
Can Easily Strip Off Frame and Hip Belt Yes Good No No No
BearVault BV500 Compatibility Yes Good Ok Ok Just OK
Lid (aka Brain) No No No No Yes, Removable

Our Analysis and Test Results

With high scores in weight to volume, comfort, and durability, the ULA Circuit is a great all-around performer. The Circuit is a great all-around pack that can be used in a variety of situations, from ultralight backpacking to wintertime trips into the backcountry.

How to Get It:
ULA packs can be difficult to find at major retailers, and we've found it's best to order directly from the small manufacturer. Do note that ULA packs can be found in some small backpacking stores, such as Sage to Summit in Bishop, CA, or the Georgia-based Mountain Crossings on the Appalachian Trail.
Get it online at: ULA-Equipment.com.

Performance Comparisons


The Circuit has lots of external storage options, making it...
The Circuit has lots of external storage options, making it versatile and adaptable.
Photo: Jane Jackson

Weight-to-Volume Ratio


The ULA Circuit receives an average score in this metric for a few reasons. The first being that the difference between its total weight and stripped weight is minimal, making the average weight of the pack higher than packs that can be stripped down quite a bit. Though the Circuit gets a lower score in the weight to volume metric, it is still a pack that feels light because of its simple design. The Circuit weighs 40 ounces total and can carry up to 64 liters. For a large capacity pack, we were impressed by the Circuit's ability to feel lightweight, without sacrificing comfort.

Carrying Comfort


When it comes to comfort, the ULA Circuit performs very well in our field tests. Our qualitative impressions of the pack from multiple days in the Yosemite backcountry lines up with ULA's claims that this pack is designed with comfort in mind. The pack has a 1.2 ounce carbon fiber and Delrin suspension hoop in conjunction with a solid internal foam frame and a single aluminum stay. This frame design gives good back support, load control, and rigidity without sacrificing weight or limiting the range of movement with the pack on.

The waist belt on the ULA Circuit provides loads of support and...
The waist belt on the ULA Circuit provides loads of support and extra storage space.
Photo: Jane Jackson

The straps and waist belt are also designed with comfort in mind. The shoulder straps didn't rub uncomfortably and seemed to be equally comfortable on male and female hikers. The waist belt is comfortable and widely adjustable as well. This pack is up there with our award winners as a pack that earned a "great" in our comfort ratings.

Features


In general, the ULA Circuit has most everything we wanted in an ultralight backpacking pack, with a few small flaws. We found that the two side pockets were constructed with an opening that is set at a steep angle, which made for wasted space and excess fabric. The side pockets were only useful for storing water bottles, which works great, but lacks the versatility of other packs that have many different sized pockets. The Circuit does have a large mesh pocket common in ultralight pack design, which was great for drying out wet items throughout the day.

The roll-top closure of on the ULA Circuit makes for lots of...
The roll-top closure of on the ULA Circuit makes for lots of adjustability in the pack's carrying capacity.
Photo: Jane Jackson

The roll-top closure system was a feature that took some getting used to, but in the end, we liked the simplicity of the system and the flexibility it provided.

Adaptability


Since it is a large pack, the Circuit scored lower in this metric. The pack performs optimally when loaded with 15 to 25 pounds. It does work with more weight, but we found it began to feel more uncomfortable on the shoulder straps. The roll-top closure is a nice feature since you can synch down the pack when carrying less volume, while still having the capability to fill the pack to its full capacity.

Durability


The ULA Circuit received high scores in durability, mostly due to the fabrics used in its construction. After three months of use and abuse on the trail, we found no signs of wear and tear on the pack. The ULA 210 Robic fabric used for the main body of the pack is incredibly abrasion resistant, as is the Robic fabric used for the side pockets. ULA also received lots of feedback on the large mesh pocket and have recently changed the fabric to a tighter-knit, less see-through mesh that is much more durable.

This pack shines on long trips carrying heavy loads.
This pack shines on long trips carrying heavy loads.
Photo: Jane Jackson

Value


The ULA Circuit falls in the middle of the road regarding price. Since ULA is a small, Utah based company, you know you are getting a good product when you buy from them. The owners of the company are backpacking enthusiasts and are receptive to input and feedback from customers. Also, they use incredibly durable fabrics in their construction, so you can be assured the Circuit will last a number of years.

From valleys to ridge-crests, the ULA Circuit was always a top...
From valleys to ridge-crests, the ULA Circuit was always a top performer.
Photo: Jane Jackson

Conclusion


The ULA Circuit scored highly in almost all metric categories and performed great on the ground day after day. In terms of weight to volume, the pack is almost unmatched. Comfort-wise, the ULA is up there with the two Gossamer Gear packs as the most comfortable ultralight packs we tested. The only negative feedback we got was in a few of the design features, mainly the size and positioning of the pockets. The pack is versatile; in fact, it seems that its best application would be as a one-pack- quiver, as it is a pack that can perform in a variety of situations.

Jane Jackson