REI Co-op Flash Air 2 Review
Our Verdict
Compare to Similar Products
![]() This Product
REI Co-op Flash Air 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Awards | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Price | $349 List Check Price at REI | $419.00 at Amazon Compare at 3 sellers | $329 List $164.49 at REI | $499.00 at Amazon Compare at 3 sellers | $319 List |
Overall Score ![]() |
|||||
Star Rating | |||||
Pros | Very lightweight, packable | Lightweight, good headroom for its size, double side doors, massive storage pocket | Spacious, affordable, included footprint | Large vestibules, good headroom, good balance between weight and durability | Lightweight, can be pitched in freestanding mode, large 'rainy day' entryway |
Cons | Feels very cramped, limited storage pockets, not adaptable | Odd door configuration, delicate materials, expensive | Heavy, bulky poles | Small doors, expensive | Low condensation resistance, small doors, tricky set up |
Bottom Line | An ultralight non-freestanding shelter for those looking to cover big miles | This is a lightweight tent for a long-distance backpacking duo that still wants the comfort of a double-wall shelter | This inexpensive tent is spacious enough for laid-back car camping and light enough for short to moderate backpacking trips | A reliable backpacking tent with a solid balance between interior space and weight | A good choice for all your light and fast backpacking trips for two |
Rating Categories | REI Co-op Flash Air 2 | Big Agnes Tiger Wal... | REI Co-op Half Dome... | NEMO Dagger Osmo | Tarptent Double Rai... |
Comfort (25%) | |||||
Weather Resistance (25%) | |||||
Weight (20%) | |||||
Durability (10%) | |||||
Ease of Set-up (10%) | |||||
Packed Size (10%) | |||||
Specs | REI Co-op Flash Air 2 | Big Agnes Tiger Wal... | REI Co-op Half Dome... | NEMO Dagger Osmo | Tarptent Double Rai... |
Packaged Weight | 2.49 lbs | 2.50 lbs | 4.82 lbs | 4.09 lbs | 2.60 lbs |
Floor Area | 31.7 sq ft | 28 sq ft | 35.8 sq ft | 31.3 sq ft | 30.5 sq ft |
Packed Size | 16 x 7 in | 18 x 5.5 in | 20.5 x 7 in | 19.5 x 6.5 in | 18 x 4 in |
Dimensions | 88 x 52/42 x 42 in | 86 x 52/42 x 39 in | 92 x 56 in | 90 x 50 x 42 in | 88 x 52 x 42 in |
Vestibule Area (Total) | 16.8 sq ft | 16 sq ft | 22.5 sq ft | 11.4 + 11.4 sq ft | 15 sq ft |
Peak Height | 42 in | 39 in | 42 in | 42 in | 42 in |
Number of Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Number of Poles | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Pole Diameter | Not provided | 8.7 mm | 2 mm | Not provided | 8.6 mm |
Number of Pockets | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Gear Loft | No | No | No | Sold separately | No |
Pole Material | Aluminum | DAC featherlight NFL aluminum | DAC featherlite NFL aluminum | DAC Featherlite NSL aluminum | Easton 7075 E9 aluminum |
Guy Points | 12 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
Rain Fly Material | Ripstop nylon | Ripstop nylon, PU coating (1200 mm) | 40-denier ripstop nylon/20-denier nylon mesh | 0D OSMO Ripstop | 1.3 oz/yd2 (44 g/m2) silnylon |
Inner Tent Material | Polyester | Ripstop nylon, PU coating (1200 mm), polyester mesh | 40-denier taffeta nylon | Ripstop nylon, no-see-um mesh | 1.0 oz/yd2 (34 g/m2) no-see-um mesh |
Type | Two door semi freestanding | Two door semi freestanding | Two door freestanding | Two door freestanding | Two door semi freestanding |
Our Analysis and Test Results
This tent is about as light as they come before you start to transition into the world of tarps and other non-quite-a-tent shelters.
Performance Comparison
Comfort
This tent underperforms its dimensions on paper. With an 88" length and a 52" width, it seems like this model can hang with the best of them. However, floor space is only one part of the equation. Even with a peak height of a respectable 42", the interior volume is still severely lacking. The gently sloping ceiling, narrow peak height plane, and heavy taper at the foot all combine to create a somewhat claustrophobic interior. We found that it is not particularly enjoyable for two people to be sitting up at the same time.
We do appreciate that there are two side doors. However, the poles occupy a space right outside of the tent such that the size of those doors has to be considerably smaller and slightly unconventionally located than a typical 2P. The two side storage pockets also just whisper their existence.
Weather Resistance
Though it is perfectly adequate for light to moderate rain, the Flash Air will struggle in severe weather unless it is really well guyed out. The shallow ceiling can sag in a downpour. We also struggle with how close to the ground the door runs. There is very little 'lip' like you might see on a more traditional double-wall tent; the door zipper all but touches the ground, leaving the tent susceptible to moisture and debris.
One feature worth noting is that it is a single wall tent. That is, the fly is attached to the tent body and there is no mesh ceiling. The benefit of this is that the fly is permanently attached; if you get to camp in the rain, the inside of your tent is protected as you set up. The downside is that the fly is permanently attached; there are two tiny fly vents, but most of the meaningful airflow is going to come from tying back the fly doors.
Ease of Setup
If you haven't pitched a non-freestanding shelter before, there is a steep learning curve for this model. It comes with three poles — two identical side poles for support over the doors, and one single-segment pole to expand volume at the foot. You have to start by staking out the tent, and then moving on to poles (either the included set or trekking poles). If you are going to encounter inclement weather, we recommend using the additional guyline to firm up the structure.
One of the primary drawbacks of a model like this is that it requires the right kind of site selection. The setup has to be just right for staking — even one loose corner will lead to a minor collapse. The other consideration is that even though the floor dimensions of the tent are perfectly average, the guyline to stake out the corners requires quite a bit more additional ground space, meaning that the total footprint for pitching is notably larger than the actual footprint of the tent.
Durability
This super lightweight tent comes at the expense of durability. The thin ripstop nylon floor and fly both require reasonable care. The fly and tent door zippers are also more delicate.
It won't stand up to abuse the same way that a 68D polyester tent would, but it is notably thicker nylon than other models in the 2-pound range, making it one of the more durable ultralights.
Weight and Packed Size
Of course, all of the knocks against this tent outlined above are design sacrifices made so that it can weigh as little as possible. Coming in at two pounds, eight ounces, it is, indeed, a very lightweight tent. If you opt to leave the included poles behind and use a pair of trekking poles, the weight drops to two pounds, two ounces.
Unsurprisingly, the Flash Air also packs down extremely well. The entire thing can easily be carried by one person with plenty of room to spare in a 60L pack, especially if you leave the poles behind.
Value
As far as value is concerned, we think that it is quite good. We have outlined how this tent falls short, but its shortcomings are not especially unique to this specific model; it is more a function of the style of a single wall, non-freestanding tent. With that in mind, it comes in at a relatively reasonable price point and offers enough durability that the value is there in the long run.
Conclusion
The REI Flash Air 2 is meant for the hiker that isn't quite ready to go full tarp but still wants to minimize weight as much as possible. We think if you have already made the choice to prioritize weight savings above all else, this model should remain in contention.
Ad-free. Influence-free. Powered by Testing.
GearLab is founded on the principle of honest, objective, reviews. Our experts test thousands of products each year using thoughtful test plans that bring out key performance differences between competing products. And, to assure complete independence, we buy all the products we test ourselves. No cherry-picked units sent by manufacturers. No sponsored content. No ads. Just real, honest, side-by-side testing and comparison.
Learn More