The world's most in-depth and scientific reviews of gear

Kelty Light Year XP Review

Kelty Light Year XP 20
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Price:  $150 List
Pros:  Comfortable, neck baffle seals in warm air, inexpensive.
Cons:  Heavy, bulky, drafty foot box, finicky hood closure, bad stuff sack.
Manufacturer:   Kelty
By Chris McNamara and Max Neale  ⋅  Nov 15, 2012
  • Share this article:
Our Editors independently research, test, and rate the best products. We only make money if you purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Learn more

Our Verdict

The Kelty Light Year XP is a well-featured and inexpensive twenty-degree synthetic sleeping bag for backpacking in wet conditions. We recommend this bag if you frequently venture into very wet climates with a high probability of getting your get wet and want to spend as little money as possible. Other synthetic bags found in our Backpacking Sleeping Bag Review offer more warmth when wet and many other down bags offer greater performance for nearly the same price as this bag. See our Camping Sleeping Bag Review for the best bags for car camping and general use.

Our Analysis and Test Results

The Kelty Light Year XP 20 is a budget synthetic bag for wet weather backpacking. We recommend it for camping in very wet conditions. For all other conditions down bags offer more performance for as little as $20 more and other synthetic bags offer more warmth when wet.

It's important to underscore that the Light Year XP is a budget bag that squeezes under the three pound barrier that separates our backpacking bags from general use bags. This is a very basic bag that places little emphasis on performance; it's viable into the lower forties and cold below that. It's best application is as a wet weather summer bag. Below we list some of its drawbacks.

The draft tube on the foot vent is attached at the bottom of the zipper, making curious feet and gravity itself accomplices in cold air invasion. Our taller (six foot) testers found this to be a problem regardless of the temperature; their feet lifted the draft tube and rested along the zipper. Due to this problem, warm socks are mandatory in colder temperatures. Second, the cinching mechanism for the hood pull cord is miniscule in comparison to its counterparts on other sleeping bags. Loosening the hood requires either a delicate touch with dainty fingers, or a powerful outward force. A larger adjustment would benefit the bag. Third, the bag is a bit on the bulky side. The neck baffle and foot vent add weight and bulk.

While the bag maybe nice, the included compression stuff sack is terrible: its made of a thin nylon, the stitching on the straps is weak (we broke one after two months), and its too large to significantly compress the bag. See our Best Sleeping Bag Stuff Sack Article to compare our favorite sacks.

Chris McNamara and Max Neale