< Go to Hiking Shoes - Women's

Hands-on Gear Review

Ahnu Sugarpine WP - Women's Review

Ahnu Sugarpine WP - Women's NEW
Price:   $136 List | $96.93 at REI
Compare prices at 4 resellers
Pros:  Lightweight, waterproof
Cons:  Not a lot of support
Bottom line:  A great shoe for shorter hikes or less rugged terrain.
Editors' Rating:     
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Manufacturer:   Ahnu

Our Verdict

The Ahnu Sugrapine WP is the lightest and most "street-styled" model in our hiking shoe review. There is a fair amount of cushioning in both the heel and the forefoot, making for a comfortable stride, however the shoe is lacking in arch support and the lacing system doesn't extend very far down the front. Combined with the soft sole makes this shoe great for light hikes and around town wear, but not rugged enough for longer excursions or for wearing with a pack. Look to our Editors' Choice winner, the Oboz Sawtooth Low BDry - Women's, for a burly shoe that can handle a variety of terrain and an overnight hike with a heavier pack.


RELATED REVIEW: The Best Hiking Shoes for Women Review

select up to 5 products
Score Product Price Our Take
87
$140
Editors' Choice Award
A great shoe for long or short hikes, with or without a pack.
83
$160
Top Pick Award
Perfect shoe for those who want or need exceptional cushion and comfort in their footwear.
75
$120
Great shoe for people who like to move fast in the mountains without a heavy pack.
73
$100
Best Buy Award
An affordable option for warm and dry climates.
72
$120
A great shoe for fast and light hiking.
72
$140
A good shoe for someone who likes to day and overnight hike and only wants one pair of shoes.
70
$136
A great shoe for shorter hikes or less rugged terrain.
70
$210
A stiff shoe for those who prefer minimal cushion but lots of durability.
60
$115
Great shoe for those with wide feet who need a hiker for arid areas.
60
$140
This low-cut hiker fell to the bottom of our list due to a slippery insole and lack of support.

Our Analysis and Hands-on Test Results

Review by:
Cam McKenzie Ring
Senior Review Editor
OutdoorGearLab

Last Updated:
Sunday
March 26, 2017

Share:
The Ahnu Sugrapine WP has a leather and mesh upper, soft-density EVA midsole, a waterproof membrane, and a non-marking Vibram rubber outsole. While the length was true to size in the size 10 women's that we tested it in, they do feel like they are cut on the narrow side, which was fine for us as our head tester has narrow feet, but is something to consider if you have wider feet that average.

This mostly synthetic shoe comes in some fun colors  and they are ready to go out of the box - no break-in required.
This mostly synthetic shoe comes in some fun colors, and they are ready to go out of the box - no break-in required.

Performance Comparison


Below you can see how the Sugarpine scored in our side-by-side testing process.


Comfort


These shoes feel fairly comfortable on. They have a soft density EVA mid-sole (as opposed to dual density midsoles that most other models use), and when combined with the mostly synthetic upper which requires zero break-in period, these shoes feel comfortable straight away. However, they were almost too soft, and once we had a couple of miles underfoot or a heavier pack on, they did not feel as comfortable. Our Top Pick for Comfort, the Hoka One One Tor Summit WP - Women's, hit the sweet spot of providing supreme comfort underfoot without being too soft.

We tested these shoes on hard desert trails which offered no rebound or cushioning. As such  we really noticed how soft these shoes were  which made them less comfortable over long distances.
We tested these shoes on hard desert trails which offered no rebound or cushioning. As such, we really noticed how soft these shoes were, which made them less comfortable over long distances.

Support


These shoes have adequate arch support — more than the Asolo Outlaw GV - Women's but less than the Merrell Moab 2 Ventilator - Women's. But the sides of the shoe are so soft that they never felt too supportive overall. While hiking on smooth trails and moderate terrain they offered a comfortable, running shoe-like fit and stride, but as soon as the terrain became uneven or rocky, they did not provide adequate lateral support. The lacing system is also the simplest of all of the shoes in our review. With only four eyelet pairs these shoes are easily tightened or loosened, but we missed the ability to lace our hiking shoes lower along the foot. Most hiking shoes have laces that extend almost to the base of the toes, but the Sugarpine's laces stopped an inch or so shier. While this gives you an overly flexible bend at the toes, we did feel like the lack of adjustability affected the support when hiking steep trails.

These soft shoes didn't feel very supportive on rocky terrain.
These soft shoes didn't feel very supportive on rocky terrain.

Traction


The Oboz (left) vs the Ahnus (right). The Oboz sole has an aggressive and deep tread pattern  while the Ahnu's is narrower and less pronounced.
The Oboz (left) vs the Ahnus (right). The Oboz sole has an aggressive and deep tread pattern, while the Ahnu's is narrower and less pronounced.

The tread pattern on these shoes is shallow and somewhat uniform around the outer edges. The Vibram rubber is on the softer and stickier side, which did give us good traction when scrambling on sandstone slabs. While hiking on well-managed trails these shoes had adequate traction, but on steeper and looser terrain we prefer a more aggressive design like the soles on the Oboz Sawtooth Low BDry.

Will it stick? The Vibram rubber used on this shoe is sticky  and we had decent traction when scrambling on bare rock.
Will it stick? The Vibram rubber used on this shoe is sticky, and we had decent traction when scrambling on bare rock.

Weight


The Ahnu Sugarpine WP was the lightest hiking shoe that we tested. The size 10 pair that we wore weighed in at 1 pound 9 ounces, or about 12.5 ounces per shoe. That makes them almost as light as a typical trail runner, and we could really noticed the difference a few ounces makes especially when compared to the heaviest shoe in our review, the Lowa Renegade II GTX Lo - Women's (17 ounces per shoe).

The Ahnus (left) vs the Lowas (right). These were the lightest and heaviest shoes in this reviews  and really represent the two sides of the spectrum when it comes to hiking shoe construction: new-school lightweight synthetic designs vs old-school leather and stiff soles.
The Ahnus (left) vs the Lowas (right). These were the lightest and heaviest shoes in this reviews, and really represent the two sides of the spectrum when it comes to hiking shoe construction: new-school lightweight synthetic designs vs old-school leather and stiff soles.

Water Resistance


The waterproof membrane did the trick, and our feet stayed completely dry during our bucket test. There was some saturation of the upper though, and the side of the shoe was not quite as high cut as the Oboz Sawtooth Low BDry and the Hoka One One Tor Summit.

Durability


These shoes did surprise us with their durability. With an almost completely synthetic upper (there's a narrow band of leather along the bottom) we thought they might easily shred to pieces in the tough desert environment that we tested them in. The synthetic material they use is highly abrasion resistant though and we had no issues with scratching or tearing. We are still a little concerned about the toe cap though, which doesn't provide near the amount of protection as the large rubber protector on the Keen Voyageur - Women's or the Salomon Ellipse GTX - Women's.

Toe stubbers beware! The minimal toe bumper won't provide much protection from sloppy footwork on the trail.
Toe stubbers beware! The minimal toe bumper won't provide much protection from sloppy footwork on the trail.

Best Applications


The Ahnu Sugarpine WP are best for day hiking without a heavy pack. Due to their lack of aggressive tread, they are best suited to mellower trails without loose dirt or gravel.

Heading out for a light hike is the best use for these shoes.
Heading out for a light hike is the best use for these shoes.

Value


The Ahnu Sugarpine WP retails for $130, which is actually a reasonable price for a fully waterproof shoe in our estimation.

Conclusion


The Ahnu Sugarpine WP offers a lot of interesting features, and the synthetic construction provides the option for a variety of color choices, unlike the 50 shades of taupe that most hiking shoes come in. They are lightweight and comfortable, but not the most rugged pair that we tested. If light day hiking on moderate trails is your thing, then these are a great pair.

Other Versions


Ahnu make a full waterproof boot version, the Ahnu Sugarpine ($140) as well as a mesh version of the low cut shoe ($110)
Cam McKenzie Ring

  • Share this article:
You Might Also Like

Where to Buy?


Thinking about buying some gear we've reviewed? Help OutdoorGearLab out if you do. Just click on any of the above seller links and if you make any purchase, the seller will contribute a portion of the sale to help support this site. It won't cost you anything extra, and it's a simple way to help us fund our gear reviews. Thanks!

*Most retailers free shipping offers apply only to lower 48 US states using ground/economy shipping. See retailer's website for details.


OutdoorGearLab Member Reviews


Most recent review: March 26, 2017
Summary of All Ratings

OutdoorGearLab Editors' Rating:   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 (4.0)
Average Customer Rating:     (0.0)
Rating Distribution
1 Total Ratings
5 star: 0%  (0)
4 star: 100%  (1)
3 star: 0%  (0)
2 star: 0%  (0)
1 star: 0%  (0)


Have you used the Ahnu Sugarpine WP - Women's?
Don't hold back. Share your viewpoint by posting a review with your thoughts...

Write a Review on this Gear
 
Where's the Best Price?
Seller Price
REI $96.93  -  29% off!
Backcountry $129.95  -  4% off!
MooseJaw $129.95  -  4% off!
Compare prices at 4 sellers >

*You help support OutdoorGearLab's product testing and reviews by purchasing from our retail partners.


Follow Us

Other Gear by Ahnu

Unbiased.