Hands-on Gear Review

Compare hiking shoes ratings side-by-side >

La Sportiva FC ECO 2.0 Review

   

Hiking Shoes - Men's

  • Currently 4.0/5
Overall avg rating 4.0 of 5 based on 1 review. Most recent review: October 6, 2014
Street Price:   $150 | Compare prices at 6 resellers
Pros:  Very durable, great foot support, snug fit.
Cons:  Heavy and stiff.
Best Uses:  Ridge scrambles, backpacking, casual wear.
User Rating:       (0.0 of 5) based on 0 reviews
Manufacturer:   La Sportiva
Review by: Brandon Lampley ⋅ Review Editor, OutdoorGearLab ⋅ October 6, 2014  
Overview
The La Sportiva FC ECO 2.0 is a good-looking and robust shoe. The stiff leather uppers and burly shank and midsole inspire a feeling of confidence on rough terrain and with a pack. It delivers great traction, and we gave it the highest score for foot support. These characteristics helped the shoe out-perform many of its competitors when we were carrying moderate loads. We also loved its casual unassuming appearance, which let our testers keep them on from landscaping the yard to office meetings.

This shoe fits narrow to average feet and captures a narrow heel well. The Lowa Renegade II GTX Lo is very similar in support and feel and comes in narrow, regular and wide sizes. The Patagonia Drifter A/C GORE-TEX is a more comfortable and versatile shoe.

Compare top rated competitors side-by-side >

  • Photos
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge


OutdoorGearLab Editors' Hands-on Review

La Sportiva FC ECO 2.0 earned top scores for support and durability. One of the heavier shoes we tested, it is surprisingly cool and breathable for a mostly leather model.

Performance Comparison
Click to enlarge
The FC Eco 2.0 and Outdoor Research Helium 2 have just seen Brandon Lampley through a surprise summer snow storm on Torreys Peak.
Credit: Brandon Lampley
Comfort
In terms of comfort, the La Sportiva FC ECO 2.0 feels pretty firm and uninviting at first. The sole is quite stiff, the leather uppers are substantial and the footbed is solid. As this shoe started to break in though, we grew fonder of its supportive nature and strong backbone.

The lacing system is basic. After first passing through a webbing loop on the mesh forefoot, the laces continue through five traditional round metal eyelets. This gets the job done, but doesn't provide the adjustability of more modern lacing systems.

The mesh portion of the upper, which forms the forefoot flex point, provides just enough room for this shoe to breathe better than we anticipated.

Weight
This model weighed in at 2.51 lbs, the third heaviest of the bunch. The dense sole, extremely protective toe-cap reminiscent of approach shoes, and thick leather uppers contribute to its weight, but also contribute to the benefits of this shoe, namely support and durability.

Support
This product's design prioritizes support, and received the highest score we awarded. During long days out in rough terrain and on backpacking trips this shoe excels. This stiffness also makes the shoe a top performer for scrambling rocky ridges and playing in the talus.

Click to enlarge
Rocking the Montane Minimus rain jacket and the ECO on a quick jaunt around Grays and Torreys.
Credit: Brandon Lampley

Traction
The La Sportiva FC ECO 2.0 surprisingly let us down a bit in the traction category. While the sole holds well on dry rock and in the mud, wet granite slabs and gravel are not its strong suit. The Vibram River sole seems to be one of the harder soles we tested.

Versatility
This shoe is a bit heavy and stiff for smooth trails and short dayhikes, but is a favorite for backpacking and longer hikes in rough terrain. It takes well to moving fast in rough terrain, but running is not comfortable. This is a good-looking shoe and the only one we tested with only one color available. Good thing this light tan makes for a great casual shoe. At work or out to a casual dinner these look great.

Water Resistance
This model is another standout in the waterproofing category. They kept our feet dry as a bone and the leather resists absorbing water very well. After some use and scuffing up, the leather does soak up water and get heavy – using a leather conditioner is a great option.

Durability
Our first assumption about this shoe's durability turned out to be flat wrong. The only mesh portion of the upper is the forefoot flex point, and we figured it would wear quickly. This is a common wear spot on hiking footwear from abrasion. But La Sportiva's 100 percent recycled mesh shows no signs of wear after lots of scrambling and rough hiking. Add the quality leather and relatively hard sole and this boot was a top scorer.

Click to enlarge
The leather upper and rubber toe cap make this one of the most durable shoes we tested. Even the mesh at the flexpoint stands up to abuse.
Credit: Brandon Lampley

Best Applications
The La Sportiva FC ECO 2.0 feels most at home on rougher trails and carrying a pack, in addition to being a fine casual shoe.

Value
At $150 list price, this model comes in the middle of the shoes. Folks with narrow feet that want a very supportive, durable shoe think it's a great deal.

Conclusion
Coined as a "low top, waterproof, versatile shoe" by La Sporitiva, we feel like they got what they set out to accomplish. This model is stiff and requires some breaking in, and is perfect for rough terrain and backpacking. Our narrow-footed lead tester loves them for ridge traverses and light backpacking.

Click to enlarge
The Eco 2.0 was one of our favorite shoes for ridge scrambling. A little unexpected September snow storm on the Kelso Ridge, Torreys Peak, CO.
Credit: Brandon Lampley

Other Versions and Accessories
The FC ECO 2.0 - Women's, are the women's version of this shoe.

The La Sportiva FC Eco 3.0 GTX and La Sportiva FC ECO 3.0 GTX - Women's, $175, are the slightly lower cut version of the the Eco 4.0 men's boot about which we did a full review. The appearance and specs for the two are virtually the same aside from modest differences in weight, color and price. The 3.0 Weighs 18.6 ounces rather than 21, comes in a different color, costs about $5 more, has a different lacing system, and does not offer as much ankle support. The 3.0 still has full ankle coverage but leans more in the light hiker and mid category.

Brandon Lampley and Tommy Penick

Compare this product side-by-side to top competitors >

Where to Buy?


Thinking about buying some gear we've reviewed? Help OutdoorGearLab out if you do. Just click on any of the above seller links and if you make any purchase, the seller will contribute a portion of the sale to help support this site. It won't cost you anything extra, and it's a simple way to help us fund our gear reviews. Thanks!

*Most retailers free shipping offers apply only to lower 48 US states using ground/economy shipping. See retailer's website for details.


OutdoorGearLab Member Reviews


Most recent review: October 6, 2014
Summary of All Ratings

OutdoorGearLab Editors' Rating:   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 (4.0)
Average Customer Rating:     (0.0)
Rating Distribution
1 Total Ratings
5 star: 0%  (0)
4 star: 100%  (1)
3 star: 0%  (0)
2 star: 0%  (0)
1 star: 0%  (0)


Have you used the La Sportiva FC ECO 2.0?
Don't hold back. Share your viewpoint by posting a review with your thoughts...

Write a Review on this Gear
Click to enlarge
Where's the Best Price?
Seller Price
Backcountry $149.95
Amazon $149.95
CampSaver $149.95
Compare prices at 6 sellers >

*Help support OutdoorGearLab. If you click on one of the seller links and make a purchase, a portion of the sale helps support this site
Related Best-in-Class Review
The Best Hiking Shoe for Men Review

The Best Hiking Shoe for Men Review

What’s the best men’s hiking shoe? We tested nine of most popular hiking shoes across various terrain and conditions throughout the country.
Helpful Buying Tips
Get More OutdoorGearLab
Follow us on Twitter, be a fan on Facebook!
Subscribe to our Newsletter