Hands-on Gear Review
Compare hardshell jacket ratings side-by-side >
Street Price: $599 | Compare prices at 3 resellers
Pros: More durable than company's Super Pluma, great fit, versatile hand pockets, near perfect hidden cord adjustments, pit zips one with one hand,
Cons: Hand pockets provide little protection for hands, zippers are difficult to pull, some say can be too tight for resort style snowsports, heavier and less durable than Arcteryx Alpha SV.
Best Uses: Alpine climbing, mountaineering, expeditions of all types.
The Super Alpine is Patagonia's most durable all-purpose hardshell. It has the exact same cut as the award winning Super Pluma but adds gasket-like seals at the wrist and uses a more durable face fabric for high abrasion areas. These features make it 3.3 oz heavier than the Super Pluma. The Super Alpine is our top rated all-purpose durable hardshell. It performs very well at all of the activities the Super Pluma does (everything) while providing the increased reliability and longevity of a more durable material.
Although the Super Alpine is an excellent hardshell, our testers prefer the Arc'teryx Alpha SV for applications that require increased durability and storm protection. The Alpha SV is more durable than the Super Alpine, has a more comfortable hood, easier zipper, larger and more reliable velcro wrist closures, and larger crossover chest pockets that open easier. The Alpha SV does not have handwarmer pockets, however, so you'll need to bring gloves when going out on the town.
Check out our complete Hardshell Jacket Review to compare all of the models tested.
Compare top rated competitors side-by-side >
OutdoorGearLab Editors' Hands-on Review
The Super Alpine is a more durable version of the company's Super Pluma. The jackets are identical with the following except the Super Alpine uses a more durable face fabric and has rubber gasket-like wrist closures that seal out the elements.
The Super Alpine is constructed with three-layer Gore-Tex Pro membrane, the most durable and warmest waterproof breathable technology we know of. All Pro jackets utilize the same membrane and micro grid backer, but the specific face fabric (outermost layer) can be customized. Here, the Super Alpine uses a 3.8 oz 40-denier Gore-Tex Pro Shell (green in our test model) with 4.9-oz 150-denier Pro Shell reinforcements (orange). These fabrics, and the jacket's pattern, are excellent. The lighter material is used on the back, underarms, and neck, while the front, shoulders and hood are reinforced. As a result, the Super Alpine is 3.3 oz heavier than the Super Pluma. (Patagonia lists the Super Alpine as being 18.5 oz., but our scale measured it as 17.4 oz.) The Super Alpine increased durability makes it better suited to trips of longer duration and activities that demand a very strong and abrasion resistant jacket.
The Super Alpine's features are identical to the Super Pluma's except the Super Alpine has a gasket-like rubber closure on the wrists, which help to seal out cold air and various forms of frozen precipitation. The Super Alpine is the only shell we tested with this feature. We don't believe they solve a critical problem, but they also don't take away from the jacket.
Like the Super Pluma the Super Alpine is a simple yet fully featured jacket. The Super Alpine has two moderately sized handwarmer pockets that sit high up on the chest, away from a backpack's waistbelt or a climbing harness. Hidden bellows and a flat pleated front look good allow you to see look down and see your feet, and they expand to accommodate medium sized objects or to protect your hands from the elements. The jacket also has one small internal zippered pocket for items like keys and an ID. And, finally, two large watertight pit zips dump heat and moisture vapor when you're working hard.
As for the details, the Super Alpine has excellent hidden cord adjustments at the hood (two on the front and at on the top rear) and bottom hem (one on each side). These are flat, so you can pinch them with gloves on, and are covered with a grey rubbery material that allows you can find them easily (if the jacket is orange or green). The Mountain Hardwear Drystein II uses the same adjusters, but lacks the grey rubber identifiers- we were surprised at how much of a difference they make when finding the adjustments quickly.
The Super Alpine's cut is also the same as the Super Pluma's; it strikes a happy medium between ultralight trim-fitting shells (Arc'teryx Alpha FL) and bulky expedition mountaineering jackets (Rab Latok). It's small enough to be worn comfortably over a single baselayer, yet is also adequately spacious for covering a midweight down or synthetic insulated jacket.
The Super Pluma is backed by both Patagonia's Ironclad Guarantee and Gore's unconditional lifetime warranty.
Although our testers love the Super Pluma, we found the Super Alpine's feature set to be less than ideal, and inferior to other similarly durable hardshells. Specifically, we prefer the Arc'teryx Alpha SV to the Super Alpine. Here's why: The Alpha SV is constructed entirely from Gore-Tex Pro Shell with a 4.3 oz 80-denier n80p-X face fabric. This material is lighter per area yet, according to Arc'teryx, more durable than the reinforced areas on the Super Alpine. (Arc'teryx used the Super Alpine's current fabric on the previous generation Alpha SV and says that the new fabric uses a higher quality yarn with a higher density plain weave.) Being constructed entirely of n80p-X, the Alpha SV is therefore more durable than the Super Alpine. The Alpha SV has other advantages, too (over both the Super Pluma and Super Alpine): its hood is larger, slightly more comfortable to wear over a helmet, and has four drawcord adjustments instead of three (which provides a more customized fit); its primary zipper is much easier to open with one hand; its pockets are larger and easier to open, its velcro wrist closures are larger and are more reliable; it has two interior zippered pockets instead of the Super Pluma and Alpine's one (both are larger, too); it has a second drawcord high up on the waist that pulls the jacket in- making it warmer and less bulky; it has more interior volume to accommodate layering; and finally, the Alpha SV does all of that and weighs 0.5 oz less than the Super Alpine.
Best Application and Value
The Super Alpine is excellent for applications where durability is the number one concern. It's great for hardcore mountaineering and backpacking. Being only $25 cheaper than the Alpha SV, however, we believe the Alpha SV is a better value.
Patagonia Super Alpine - Women's - same price, a little lighter and a slightly different cut.
— Chris McNamara and Max Neale
Compare this product side-by-side to top competitors >
OutdoorGearLab Member Reviews
Most recent review: July 18, 2013
Where's the Best Price?
*Help support OutdoorGearLab. If you click on one of the seller links and make a purchase, a portion of the sale helps support this site
Related Best-in-Class Review
Helpful Buying Tips
Get More OutdoorGearLab
Follow us on Twitter, be a fan on Facebook!
Related Gear Reviews
Other Gear by Patagonia
Recent Best-in-Class Reviews